正常听力成人的下一代听觉稳态反应:一项先导测试-重测信度研究

H. Hamad, Nilesh J. Washnik, Chandan H. Suresh
{"title":"正常听力成人的下一代听觉稳态反应:一项先导测试-重测信度研究","authors":"H. Hamad, Nilesh J. Washnik, Chandan H. Suresh","doi":"10.3390/ohbm4020006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) provides objective and ear-specific information essential for early and appropriate intervention. Test–retest reliability is essential for audiological monitoring. The test–retest reliability of the ASSR has received limited attention. Only a handful of studies found in the literature investigated the test–retest reliability of old-generation ASSR using amplitude or mixed modulated stimuli. However, to our knowledge, no published reports have specifically examined the test–retest reliability of the next-generation ASSR using Chirp family stimuli as implemented in the Interacoustics Eclipse system. This pilot study investigated (a) the test–retest reliability of air conduction (AC) ASSR thresholds across two test sessions and (b) the relationship between differences in ASSR thresholds across two sessions to the residual noise levels in normal-hearing adults. Methods: Fifteen normal-hearing adults (12 females) (30 ears) with an average age of 28 years were recruited for the study. The ASSRs were recorded using a two-channel recording montage. The automatic default stimuli and recording protocol using 90 Hz ASSR, and the accuracy method (p < 0.01) as implemented in the Eclipse system is used to measure ASSR. Results: The study demonstrated strong test–retest reliability for ASSR across frequencies (500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, and 4000 Hz). Notably, the highest reliability was observed at 500 Hz. The mean test–retest reliability of ASSR was found to be comparable to pure-tone thresholds, but the intra-subject variability is higher for ASSR compared to pure-tone thresholds. Additionally, no significant correlation was found between the difference in ASSR residual noise levels at the threshold and the difference in ASSR thresholds at all tested frequencies. Conclusion: The next-generation system demonstrated strong test–retest reliability across the frequencies examined in this pilot study. Particularly, an improvement in reliability was observed at 500 Hz compared to the old-generation ASSR. This enhancement can be attributed to the utilization of narrow-band CE-chirp stimuli, which generate large amplitude responses, and the implementation of an improved detection paradigm involving multiple harmonics spectral and phase analysis. This pilot study only enrolled adults with normal hearing, and future investigations should include a larger sample size comprising both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals, as well as the pediatric population.","PeriodicalId":73883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of otorhinolaryngology, hearing and balance medicine","volume":"250 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Next-Generation Auditory Steady-State Responses in Normal-Hearing Adults: A Pilot Test–Retest Reliability Study\",\"authors\":\"H. Hamad, Nilesh J. Washnik, Chandan H. Suresh\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ohbm4020006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) provides objective and ear-specific information essential for early and appropriate intervention. Test–retest reliability is essential for audiological monitoring. The test–retest reliability of the ASSR has received limited attention. Only a handful of studies found in the literature investigated the test–retest reliability of old-generation ASSR using amplitude or mixed modulated stimuli. However, to our knowledge, no published reports have specifically examined the test–retest reliability of the next-generation ASSR using Chirp family stimuli as implemented in the Interacoustics Eclipse system. This pilot study investigated (a) the test–retest reliability of air conduction (AC) ASSR thresholds across two test sessions and (b) the relationship between differences in ASSR thresholds across two sessions to the residual noise levels in normal-hearing adults. Methods: Fifteen normal-hearing adults (12 females) (30 ears) with an average age of 28 years were recruited for the study. The ASSRs were recorded using a two-channel recording montage. The automatic default stimuli and recording protocol using 90 Hz ASSR, and the accuracy method (p < 0.01) as implemented in the Eclipse system is used to measure ASSR. Results: The study demonstrated strong test–retest reliability for ASSR across frequencies (500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, and 4000 Hz). Notably, the highest reliability was observed at 500 Hz. The mean test–retest reliability of ASSR was found to be comparable to pure-tone thresholds, but the intra-subject variability is higher for ASSR compared to pure-tone thresholds. Additionally, no significant correlation was found between the difference in ASSR residual noise levels at the threshold and the difference in ASSR thresholds at all tested frequencies. Conclusion: The next-generation system demonstrated strong test–retest reliability across the frequencies examined in this pilot study. Particularly, an improvement in reliability was observed at 500 Hz compared to the old-generation ASSR. This enhancement can be attributed to the utilization of narrow-band CE-chirp stimuli, which generate large amplitude responses, and the implementation of an improved detection paradigm involving multiple harmonics spectral and phase analysis. This pilot study only enrolled adults with normal hearing, and future investigations should include a larger sample size comprising both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals, as well as the pediatric population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of otorhinolaryngology, hearing and balance medicine\",\"volume\":\"250 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of otorhinolaryngology, hearing and balance medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ohbm4020006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of otorhinolaryngology, hearing and balance medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ohbm4020006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

听觉稳态反应(ASSR)为早期和适当的干预提供了客观和耳朵特异性的信息。听力学监测的重测可靠性至关重要。ASSR的重测信度一直受到较少的关注。文献中只有少数研究使用振幅或混合调制刺激研究了老一代ASSR的重测信度。然而,据我们所知,还没有发表的报告专门研究了使用Chirp家族刺激在Interacoustics Eclipse系统中实现的下一代ASSR的测试-重测可靠性。本初步研究调查了(a)两个测试阶段中空气传导(AC) ASSR阈值的测试-重测信度,以及(b)正常听力成人中两个测试阶段中ASSR阈值差异与残余噪声水平之间的关系。方法:招募15名听力正常的成年人(女性12名),平均年龄28岁,30耳。使用双通道蒙太奇录制assr。采用90 Hz ASSR的自动默认刺激和记录方案,以及Eclipse系统中实现的准确度法(p < 0.01)来测量ASSR。结果:该研究显示ASSR在不同频率(500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz和4000 Hz)上具有很强的重测信度。值得注意的是,在500 Hz时观察到最高的可靠性。研究发现,ASSR的平均重测信度与纯音阈值相当,但与纯音阈值相比,ASSR的受试者内部变异性更高。此外,在阈值处ASSR残余噪声水平的差异与所有测试频率下ASSR阈值的差异之间没有发现显著的相关性。结论:新一代系统在本次试点研究中显示了很强的测试重测可靠性。特别是,与老一代ASSR相比,在500 Hz时观察到可靠性的提高。这种增强可以归因于窄带CE-chirp刺激的利用,它产生了大的振幅响应,以及改进的检测范式的实施,包括多谐波频谱和相位分析。这项试点研究只招募了听力正常的成年人,未来的调查应该包括更大的样本量,包括听力正常和听力受损的个体,以及儿科人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Next-Generation Auditory Steady-State Responses in Normal-Hearing Adults: A Pilot Test–Retest Reliability Study
The Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) provides objective and ear-specific information essential for early and appropriate intervention. Test–retest reliability is essential for audiological monitoring. The test–retest reliability of the ASSR has received limited attention. Only a handful of studies found in the literature investigated the test–retest reliability of old-generation ASSR using amplitude or mixed modulated stimuli. However, to our knowledge, no published reports have specifically examined the test–retest reliability of the next-generation ASSR using Chirp family stimuli as implemented in the Interacoustics Eclipse system. This pilot study investigated (a) the test–retest reliability of air conduction (AC) ASSR thresholds across two test sessions and (b) the relationship between differences in ASSR thresholds across two sessions to the residual noise levels in normal-hearing adults. Methods: Fifteen normal-hearing adults (12 females) (30 ears) with an average age of 28 years were recruited for the study. The ASSRs were recorded using a two-channel recording montage. The automatic default stimuli and recording protocol using 90 Hz ASSR, and the accuracy method (p < 0.01) as implemented in the Eclipse system is used to measure ASSR. Results: The study demonstrated strong test–retest reliability for ASSR across frequencies (500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, and 4000 Hz). Notably, the highest reliability was observed at 500 Hz. The mean test–retest reliability of ASSR was found to be comparable to pure-tone thresholds, but the intra-subject variability is higher for ASSR compared to pure-tone thresholds. Additionally, no significant correlation was found between the difference in ASSR residual noise levels at the threshold and the difference in ASSR thresholds at all tested frequencies. Conclusion: The next-generation system demonstrated strong test–retest reliability across the frequencies examined in this pilot study. Particularly, an improvement in reliability was observed at 500 Hz compared to the old-generation ASSR. This enhancement can be attributed to the utilization of narrow-band CE-chirp stimuli, which generate large amplitude responses, and the implementation of an improved detection paradigm involving multiple harmonics spectral and phase analysis. This pilot study only enrolled adults with normal hearing, and future investigations should include a larger sample size comprising both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals, as well as the pediatric population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信