{"title":"评估公共卫生数据系统:一种实用方法。","authors":"P. Blood","doi":"10.1037/e583982012-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1988, the Institute of Medicine published The Future of Public Health (1). According to this report, public health should perform three core functions—assessment, policy development, and assurance. Most of the health data and information activities of public health agencies fall within the assessment function. These information activities provide a basis for policy development and assurance. Since 1988 health data have become more important both in the public and private sectors. Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives(2) emphasizes the importance of measurable objectives. The National Committee for Quality Assurance developed health indicators for improving the quality, access and utilization of services in Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) (3). Most drafts of health care reform legislation recognized the need for health care data and included provisions for health care data systems. There needs to be significant attention, however, to the quality and usefulness of health data. Dr. Manning Feinleib, in an article in the American Journal of Public Health,(4) identified seven characteristics that data must have to be useful: 1) relevancy; 2) coverage; 3) quality; 4) acceptability; 5) timeliness; 6) accessibility; and 7) usability. These characteristics also apply to data collected for public health purposes. The Iowa Department of Public Health responded to these challenges and demands for quality health data in several ways. In October 1992 the Department began the project Enhancement of Capacity to Assess Progress towards Healthy People 2000 Objectives, a five-year cooperative agreement with the National Center for Health Statistics in connection with the CDC Assessment Initiative (5). Iowa is one of seven states to receive funding to enhance state capacity to use data effectively for policy development and assurance. In Iowa the project staff are located administratively in the Division of Substance Abuse and Health Promotion, the division with primary responsibility for coordinating the implementation of the Healthy Iowans 2000 plan. Healthy Iowans 2000 is the result of a broad-based public and private effort to develop year 2000 objectives for Iowa. This comprehensive document addresses components of all 22 priority areas in Healthy People 2000.","PeriodicalId":79957,"journal":{"name":"Healthy People 2000 statistical notes","volume":"79 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating public health data systems: a practical approach.\",\"authors\":\"P. Blood\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/e583982012-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1988, the Institute of Medicine published The Future of Public Health (1). According to this report, public health should perform three core functions—assessment, policy development, and assurance. Most of the health data and information activities of public health agencies fall within the assessment function. These information activities provide a basis for policy development and assurance. Since 1988 health data have become more important both in the public and private sectors. Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives(2) emphasizes the importance of measurable objectives. The National Committee for Quality Assurance developed health indicators for improving the quality, access and utilization of services in Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) (3). Most drafts of health care reform legislation recognized the need for health care data and included provisions for health care data systems. There needs to be significant attention, however, to the quality and usefulness of health data. Dr. Manning Feinleib, in an article in the American Journal of Public Health,(4) identified seven characteristics that data must have to be useful: 1) relevancy; 2) coverage; 3) quality; 4) acceptability; 5) timeliness; 6) accessibility; and 7) usability. These characteristics also apply to data collected for public health purposes. The Iowa Department of Public Health responded to these challenges and demands for quality health data in several ways. In October 1992 the Department began the project Enhancement of Capacity to Assess Progress towards Healthy People 2000 Objectives, a five-year cooperative agreement with the National Center for Health Statistics in connection with the CDC Assessment Initiative (5). Iowa is one of seven states to receive funding to enhance state capacity to use data effectively for policy development and assurance. In Iowa the project staff are located administratively in the Division of Substance Abuse and Health Promotion, the division with primary responsibility for coordinating the implementation of the Healthy Iowans 2000 plan. Healthy Iowans 2000 is the result of a broad-based public and private effort to develop year 2000 objectives for Iowa. This comprehensive document addresses components of all 22 priority areas in Healthy People 2000.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthy People 2000 statistical notes\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"1-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthy People 2000 statistical notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/e583982012-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthy People 2000 statistical notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e583982012-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
1988年,医学研究所发表了《公共卫生的未来》(1)。根据这份报告,公共卫生应该履行三个核心职能——评估、政策制定和保障。公共卫生机构的大多数卫生数据和信息活动都属于评估职能。这些信息活动为政策制定和保证提供了基础。自1988年以来,卫生数据在公共和私营部门都变得更加重要。《2000年健康人口:全国促进健康和预防疾病目标(2)》强调了可衡量目标的重要性。国家质量保证委员会(National Committee for Quality Assurance)制定了健康指标,以提高健康维护组织(HMOs)服务的质量、获取和利用(3)。大多数医疗改革立法草案都认识到对医疗数据的需求,并包括了医疗数据系统的规定。但是,必须高度重视卫生数据的质量和有用性。Manning Feinleib博士在《美国公共卫生杂志》(American Journal of Public Health)的一篇文章中(4)确定了数据必须具备的有用的七个特征:1)相关性;2)覆盖;3)质量;4)可接受性;5)及时性;6)可访问性;可用性。这些特点也适用于为公共卫生目的收集的数据。爱荷华州公共卫生部以几种方式应对这些挑战和对高质量卫生数据的需求。1992年10月,该部开始了“加强评估实现2000年健康人口目标进展情况的能力”项目,这是一项与国家卫生统计中心就疾病控制与预防中心评估倡议达成的五年期合作协议(5)。爱荷华州是获得资金的七个州之一,以加强国家有效利用数据制定和保证政策的能力。在爱荷华州,项目工作人员在行政上隶属于药物滥用和促进健康司,该司主要负责协调《2000年健康爱荷华人计划》的执行工作。《2000年健康爱荷华人》是为制定爱荷华2000年目标而进行的广泛的公共和私人努力的结果。这份综合性文件涉及《2000年健康人》所有22个优先领域的组成部分。
Evaluating public health data systems: a practical approach.
In 1988, the Institute of Medicine published The Future of Public Health (1). According to this report, public health should perform three core functions—assessment, policy development, and assurance. Most of the health data and information activities of public health agencies fall within the assessment function. These information activities provide a basis for policy development and assurance. Since 1988 health data have become more important both in the public and private sectors. Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives(2) emphasizes the importance of measurable objectives. The National Committee for Quality Assurance developed health indicators for improving the quality, access and utilization of services in Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) (3). Most drafts of health care reform legislation recognized the need for health care data and included provisions for health care data systems. There needs to be significant attention, however, to the quality and usefulness of health data. Dr. Manning Feinleib, in an article in the American Journal of Public Health,(4) identified seven characteristics that data must have to be useful: 1) relevancy; 2) coverage; 3) quality; 4) acceptability; 5) timeliness; 6) accessibility; and 7) usability. These characteristics also apply to data collected for public health purposes. The Iowa Department of Public Health responded to these challenges and demands for quality health data in several ways. In October 1992 the Department began the project Enhancement of Capacity to Assess Progress towards Healthy People 2000 Objectives, a five-year cooperative agreement with the National Center for Health Statistics in connection with the CDC Assessment Initiative (5). Iowa is one of seven states to receive funding to enhance state capacity to use data effectively for policy development and assurance. In Iowa the project staff are located administratively in the Division of Substance Abuse and Health Promotion, the division with primary responsibility for coordinating the implementation of the Healthy Iowans 2000 plan. Healthy Iowans 2000 is the result of a broad-based public and private effort to develop year 2000 objectives for Iowa. This comprehensive document addresses components of all 22 priority areas in Healthy People 2000.