抗COVID-19非药物干预措施的有效性排名综述

Q3 Computer Science
David Susic, Janez Tomšič, M. Gams
{"title":"抗COVID-19非药物干预措施的有效性排名综述","authors":"David Susic, Janez Tomšič, M. Gams","doi":"10.31449/inf.v46i4.4181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this review, we examine 34 studies based on experimental data that estimate and compare the effective ness of 12 non-pharmaceutical government interventions against COVID-19 based on cases, deaths, and/or transmission rates to assess their overall effectiveness. The studies reviewed are based on daily country level data and cover four to 200 countries and regions worldwide with varying time intervals, spanning the period between December 2019 and August 2021. We found that the overall most effective interventions are restrictions on gatherings, workplace closing, public information campaigns, and school closing, while the least effective are close public transport, contact tracing, and testing policy.","PeriodicalId":35802,"journal":{"name":"Informatica (Slovenia)","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ranking Effectiveness of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions Against COVID-19: A Review\",\"authors\":\"David Susic, Janez Tomšič, M. Gams\",\"doi\":\"10.31449/inf.v46i4.4181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this review, we examine 34 studies based on experimental data that estimate and compare the effective ness of 12 non-pharmaceutical government interventions against COVID-19 based on cases, deaths, and/or transmission rates to assess their overall effectiveness. The studies reviewed are based on daily country level data and cover four to 200 countries and regions worldwide with varying time intervals, spanning the period between December 2019 and August 2021. We found that the overall most effective interventions are restrictions on gatherings, workplace closing, public information campaigns, and school closing, while the least effective are close public transport, contact tracing, and testing policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informatica (Slovenia)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informatica (Slovenia)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v46i4.4181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatica (Slovenia)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v46i4.4181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇综述中,我们检查了34项基于实验数据的研究,这些研究根据病例、死亡和/或传播率估计和比较了12种非药物政府干预措施对COVID-19的有效性,以评估其总体有效性。所审查的研究基于每日国家级数据,涵盖全球4至200个国家和地区,时间间隔不同,时间跨度为2019年12月至2021年8月。我们发现,总体上最有效的干预措施是限制集会、关闭工作场所、公共信息运动和关闭学校,而最不有效的是关闭公共交通、接触者追踪和检测政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ranking Effectiveness of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions Against COVID-19: A Review
In this review, we examine 34 studies based on experimental data that estimate and compare the effective ness of 12 non-pharmaceutical government interventions against COVID-19 based on cases, deaths, and/or transmission rates to assess their overall effectiveness. The studies reviewed are based on daily country level data and cover four to 200 countries and regions worldwide with varying time intervals, spanning the period between December 2019 and August 2021. We found that the overall most effective interventions are restrictions on gatherings, workplace closing, public information campaigns, and school closing, while the least effective are close public transport, contact tracing, and testing policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Informatica (Slovenia)
Informatica (Slovenia) Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Informatica is an international refereed journal with its base in Europe. It has entered its 33th year of publication. It publishes papers addressing all issues of interests to computer professionals: from scientific and technical to educational, commercial and industrial. It also publishes critical examinations of existing publications, news about major practical achievements and innovations in the computer and information industry, as well as conference announcements and reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信