中草药产品中熊果苷的测定

N. Antonova, S. S. Prokhvatilova, E. Shefer, A. Kalinin, I. M. Morgunov, T. A. Golomazova, U. S. Legon’kova
{"title":"中草药产品中熊果苷的测定","authors":"N. Antonova, S. S. Prokhvatilova, E. Shefer, A. Kalinin, I. M. Morgunov, T. A. Golomazova, U. S. Legon’kova","doi":"10.30895/1991-2919-2021-11-2-121-129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arbutin is the main active ingredient in many herbal medicinal products that have diuretic, antimicrobial, bactericidal, and antioxidant effects. Many of these products are mixtures of different herbal substances. Therefore, the approaches to quality control of HMPs can vary significantly. The aim of the study was to compare arbutin assay procedures used in quality control of arbutin-containing products. Materials and methods. Samples of the following HMPs were used in the study: monocomponent Bearberry Leaf and multicomponent Brusniver® (herbal mixture, powder). The test methods used were titrimetry, ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Results. The authors compared five arbutin assay procedures described in the monographs and product files for arbutin-containing HMPs. Conclusions. It has been established that the analysed procedures cannot be used interchangeably as equivalent test methods; the limits for arbutin have to be established for each specific procedure. Iodometric titration is the most labour- and time-consuming method, and the determined titration endpoint is a subjective assessment. Spectrophotometric methods do not require the use of an arbutin reference standard, but they can give overestimated results as compared to the HPLC and titrimetry methods. HPLC methods are more selective, but they require the use of reference standards. The recommended test methods for HMP quality control are HPLC and visible spectrophotometry; the titrimetric method is recommended for replacement.","PeriodicalId":22286,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products","volume":"199 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of Arbutin in Herbal Medicinal Products\",\"authors\":\"N. Antonova, S. S. Prokhvatilova, E. Shefer, A. Kalinin, I. M. Morgunov, T. A. Golomazova, U. S. Legon’kova\",\"doi\":\"10.30895/1991-2919-2021-11-2-121-129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Arbutin is the main active ingredient in many herbal medicinal products that have diuretic, antimicrobial, bactericidal, and antioxidant effects. Many of these products are mixtures of different herbal substances. Therefore, the approaches to quality control of HMPs can vary significantly. The aim of the study was to compare arbutin assay procedures used in quality control of arbutin-containing products. Materials and methods. Samples of the following HMPs were used in the study: monocomponent Bearberry Leaf and multicomponent Brusniver® (herbal mixture, powder). The test methods used were titrimetry, ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Results. The authors compared five arbutin assay procedures described in the monographs and product files for arbutin-containing HMPs. Conclusions. It has been established that the analysed procedures cannot be used interchangeably as equivalent test methods; the limits for arbutin have to be established for each specific procedure. Iodometric titration is the most labour- and time-consuming method, and the determined titration endpoint is a subjective assessment. Spectrophotometric methods do not require the use of an arbutin reference standard, but they can give overestimated results as compared to the HPLC and titrimetry methods. HPLC methods are more selective, but they require the use of reference standards. The recommended test methods for HMP quality control are HPLC and visible spectrophotometry; the titrimetric method is recommended for replacement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products\",\"volume\":\"199 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2021-11-2-121-129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2021-11-2-121-129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

熊果苷是许多草药产品的主要活性成分,具有利尿、抗菌、杀菌和抗氧化作用。这些产品中有许多是不同草药物质的混合物。因此,hmp的质量控制方法可能会有很大差异。本研究的目的是比较熊果苷测定方法用于熊果苷产品的质量控制。材料和方法。本研究中使用的HMPs样品为:单组分熊果叶和多组分Brusniver®(草药混合物,粉末)。测定方法有滴定法、紫外可见分光光度法和高效液相色谱法。结果。作者比较了专著和产品文件中描述的含有熊果苷的hmp的五种熊果苷测定方法。结论。已经确定,所分析的程序不能作为等效的测试方法互换使用;熊果苷的限量必须为每个特定的程序建立。碘滴定法是最费力和耗时的方法,确定的滴定终点是一个主观的评估。分光光度法不需要使用熊果苷标准品,但与高效液相色谱法和滴定法相比,它们可能会给出高估的结果。高效液相色谱法选择性更强,但需要使用参考标准品。推荐采用高效液相色谱法和可见分光光度法进行HMP质量控制;建议更换滴定法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of Arbutin in Herbal Medicinal Products
Arbutin is the main active ingredient in many herbal medicinal products that have diuretic, antimicrobial, bactericidal, and antioxidant effects. Many of these products are mixtures of different herbal substances. Therefore, the approaches to quality control of HMPs can vary significantly. The aim of the study was to compare arbutin assay procedures used in quality control of arbutin-containing products. Materials and methods. Samples of the following HMPs were used in the study: monocomponent Bearberry Leaf and multicomponent Brusniver® (herbal mixture, powder). The test methods used were titrimetry, ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Results. The authors compared five arbutin assay procedures described in the monographs and product files for arbutin-containing HMPs. Conclusions. It has been established that the analysed procedures cannot be used interchangeably as equivalent test methods; the limits for arbutin have to be established for each specific procedure. Iodometric titration is the most labour- and time-consuming method, and the determined titration endpoint is a subjective assessment. Spectrophotometric methods do not require the use of an arbutin reference standard, but they can give overestimated results as compared to the HPLC and titrimetry methods. HPLC methods are more selective, but they require the use of reference standards. The recommended test methods for HMP quality control are HPLC and visible spectrophotometry; the titrimetric method is recommended for replacement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信