秋果树莓行间距和支撑系统的评价

F. Tabley, P. Rhodes, R. Haynes
{"title":"秋果树莓行间距和支撑系统的评价","authors":"F. Tabley, P. Rhodes, R. Haynes","doi":"10.1080/03015521.1988.10425629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The effects of three inter-row spacings (3 m, 1.5 m, and 0.75 m), and two support systems (training vertically or on a V-shaped trellis) on total yield, yield components, and ease of hand picking of autumn rasperries (Rubus idaeus L. ‘Heritage’) was investigated in a 3-year field trial in Canterbury. In the first year, number of fruiting canes/m2 and yields/ha were both increased as row spacings were reduced from 3 to 0.75 m. However, in the second and third seasons, although these parameters were increased as spacings were reduced from 3 to 1.5 m, a further reduction in spacing to 0.75 m had no effect. Neither the number of berries per fruiting cane nor yield per fruiting cane were significantly affected by row spacings, although there was a tendency for mean berry weight to increase as row spacing was reduced. Reducing row spacing from 1.5 to 0.75 m made access to rows difficult and reduced picking rate. Training canes on a V trellis had no significant effect on any of the measured parameters a...","PeriodicalId":19285,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand journal of experimental agriculture","volume":"50 1","pages":"137-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of row spacings and support systems for autumn-fruiting raspberries\",\"authors\":\"F. Tabley, P. Rhodes, R. Haynes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03015521.1988.10425629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The effects of three inter-row spacings (3 m, 1.5 m, and 0.75 m), and two support systems (training vertically or on a V-shaped trellis) on total yield, yield components, and ease of hand picking of autumn rasperries (Rubus idaeus L. ‘Heritage’) was investigated in a 3-year field trial in Canterbury. In the first year, number of fruiting canes/m2 and yields/ha were both increased as row spacings were reduced from 3 to 0.75 m. However, in the second and third seasons, although these parameters were increased as spacings were reduced from 3 to 1.5 m, a further reduction in spacing to 0.75 m had no effect. Neither the number of berries per fruiting cane nor yield per fruiting cane were significantly affected by row spacings, although there was a tendency for mean berry weight to increase as row spacing was reduced. Reducing row spacing from 1.5 to 0.75 m made access to rows difficult and reduced picking rate. Training canes on a V trellis had no significant effect on any of the measured parameters a...\",\"PeriodicalId\":19285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand journal of experimental agriculture\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"137-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand journal of experimental agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03015521.1988.10425629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand journal of experimental agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03015521.1988.10425629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在坎特伯雷进行了为期3年的田间试验,研究了3种行距(3 m、1.5 m和0.75 m)和2种支撑系统(垂直或v型棚架)对秋莓(Rubus idaeus L. ' Heritage ')总产量、产量组成部分和手采便利性的影响。第1年,行距由3 ~ 0.75 m减少到3 ~ 0.75 m,亩产量均有提高。然而,在第二和第三季,虽然这些参数随着间距从3减小到1.5 m而增加,但间距进一步减小到0.75 m没有影响。行距对单株果实数和单株果实产量均无显著影响,但平均果实重有随行距减小而增加的趋势。将行距从1.5 m减少到0.75 m使获取行变得困难,并降低了采摘率。在V型网格上训练手杖对任何测量参数都没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of row spacings and support systems for autumn-fruiting raspberries
Abstract The effects of three inter-row spacings (3 m, 1.5 m, and 0.75 m), and two support systems (training vertically or on a V-shaped trellis) on total yield, yield components, and ease of hand picking of autumn rasperries (Rubus idaeus L. ‘Heritage’) was investigated in a 3-year field trial in Canterbury. In the first year, number of fruiting canes/m2 and yields/ha were both increased as row spacings were reduced from 3 to 0.75 m. However, in the second and third seasons, although these parameters were increased as spacings were reduced from 3 to 1.5 m, a further reduction in spacing to 0.75 m had no effect. Neither the number of berries per fruiting cane nor yield per fruiting cane were significantly affected by row spacings, although there was a tendency for mean berry weight to increase as row spacing was reduced. Reducing row spacing from 1.5 to 0.75 m made access to rows difficult and reduced picking rate. Training canes on a V trellis had no significant effect on any of the measured parameters a...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信