{"title":"秋果树莓行间距和支撑系统的评价","authors":"F. Tabley, P. Rhodes, R. Haynes","doi":"10.1080/03015521.1988.10425629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The effects of three inter-row spacings (3 m, 1.5 m, and 0.75 m), and two support systems (training vertically or on a V-shaped trellis) on total yield, yield components, and ease of hand picking of autumn rasperries (Rubus idaeus L. ‘Heritage’) was investigated in a 3-year field trial in Canterbury. In the first year, number of fruiting canes/m2 and yields/ha were both increased as row spacings were reduced from 3 to 0.75 m. However, in the second and third seasons, although these parameters were increased as spacings were reduced from 3 to 1.5 m, a further reduction in spacing to 0.75 m had no effect. Neither the number of berries per fruiting cane nor yield per fruiting cane were significantly affected by row spacings, although there was a tendency for mean berry weight to increase as row spacing was reduced. Reducing row spacing from 1.5 to 0.75 m made access to rows difficult and reduced picking rate. Training canes on a V trellis had no significant effect on any of the measured parameters a...","PeriodicalId":19285,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand journal of experimental agriculture","volume":"50 1","pages":"137-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of row spacings and support systems for autumn-fruiting raspberries\",\"authors\":\"F. Tabley, P. Rhodes, R. Haynes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03015521.1988.10425629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The effects of three inter-row spacings (3 m, 1.5 m, and 0.75 m), and two support systems (training vertically or on a V-shaped trellis) on total yield, yield components, and ease of hand picking of autumn rasperries (Rubus idaeus L. ‘Heritage’) was investigated in a 3-year field trial in Canterbury. In the first year, number of fruiting canes/m2 and yields/ha were both increased as row spacings were reduced from 3 to 0.75 m. However, in the second and third seasons, although these parameters were increased as spacings were reduced from 3 to 1.5 m, a further reduction in spacing to 0.75 m had no effect. Neither the number of berries per fruiting cane nor yield per fruiting cane were significantly affected by row spacings, although there was a tendency for mean berry weight to increase as row spacing was reduced. Reducing row spacing from 1.5 to 0.75 m made access to rows difficult and reduced picking rate. Training canes on a V trellis had no significant effect on any of the measured parameters a...\",\"PeriodicalId\":19285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand journal of experimental agriculture\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"137-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand journal of experimental agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03015521.1988.10425629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand journal of experimental agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03015521.1988.10425629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of row spacings and support systems for autumn-fruiting raspberries
Abstract The effects of three inter-row spacings (3 m, 1.5 m, and 0.75 m), and two support systems (training vertically or on a V-shaped trellis) on total yield, yield components, and ease of hand picking of autumn rasperries (Rubus idaeus L. ‘Heritage’) was investigated in a 3-year field trial in Canterbury. In the first year, number of fruiting canes/m2 and yields/ha were both increased as row spacings were reduced from 3 to 0.75 m. However, in the second and third seasons, although these parameters were increased as spacings were reduced from 3 to 1.5 m, a further reduction in spacing to 0.75 m had no effect. Neither the number of berries per fruiting cane nor yield per fruiting cane were significantly affected by row spacings, although there was a tendency for mean berry weight to increase as row spacing was reduced. Reducing row spacing from 1.5 to 0.75 m made access to rows difficult and reduced picking rate. Training canes on a V trellis had no significant effect on any of the measured parameters a...