普通与高级野外物理教师的资格、经验与就业分析

O. Badmus, L. Jita
{"title":"普通与高级野外物理教师的资格、经验与就业分析","authors":"O. Badmus, L. Jita","doi":"10.15294/jpii.v11i2.35070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ordinary and advanced level physics teachers have similar responsibilities in impacting the knowledge of physics among learners. These responsibilities are premised around qualification, experience and job placement. Teachers’ experience has a place in the literature to influence physics performance. The curriculum of both advanced and ordinary level physics is with similarities and occasioned differences with respect to content knowledge. However, are there differences in the qualification, experience and job placement between these two sets of teachers? In view of the foregoing, this study examined advanced and ordinary level in-field physics teachers distribution vis a vis qualification, experience and job placement with a view to aggregate data for decision making, as well as, report gender representation, establish drift and possible remediation in the field. Descriptive research of the survey type was employed with Physics Teachers Ordinary and Advanced Level Inventory (PTOALI) as the instrument to elicit data from 225 physics teachers across the three states under review. Similarities exist in teachers’ qualification at ordinary and advance levels. Experience of teachers at ordinary level were higher than those teaching advanced level curriculum. Underrepresentation of female physics teachers was found among the sample audience. Also, physics teachers are limited in number across the sampled schools and that female physics teachers are under-represented within the sampled respondents. This study concludes that more qualified physics teachers are needed across the three states under review. Experienced physics teachers are also required in advanced level schools. This study recommends training and recruitment of adequate number of qualified physics teachers to cope with the surging number of willing learners. ","PeriodicalId":37652,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Ordinary and Advanced Level In-field Physics Teachers’ Qualification, Experience and Job Placement\",\"authors\":\"O. Badmus, L. Jita\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/jpii.v11i2.35070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ordinary and advanced level physics teachers have similar responsibilities in impacting the knowledge of physics among learners. These responsibilities are premised around qualification, experience and job placement. Teachers’ experience has a place in the literature to influence physics performance. The curriculum of both advanced and ordinary level physics is with similarities and occasioned differences with respect to content knowledge. However, are there differences in the qualification, experience and job placement between these two sets of teachers? In view of the foregoing, this study examined advanced and ordinary level in-field physics teachers distribution vis a vis qualification, experience and job placement with a view to aggregate data for decision making, as well as, report gender representation, establish drift and possible remediation in the field. Descriptive research of the survey type was employed with Physics Teachers Ordinary and Advanced Level Inventory (PTOALI) as the instrument to elicit data from 225 physics teachers across the three states under review. Similarities exist in teachers’ qualification at ordinary and advance levels. Experience of teachers at ordinary level were higher than those teaching advanced level curriculum. Underrepresentation of female physics teachers was found among the sample audience. Also, physics teachers are limited in number across the sampled schools and that female physics teachers are under-represented within the sampled respondents. This study concludes that more qualified physics teachers are needed across the three states under review. Experienced physics teachers are also required in advanced level schools. This study recommends training and recruitment of adequate number of qualified physics teachers to cope with the surging number of willing learners. \",\"PeriodicalId\":37652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.35070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.35070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

普通和高级物理教师在影响学生的物理知识方面具有相似的责任。这些职责以资格、经验和工作安排为前提。教师的经验在文献中有影响物理成绩的地方。高等物理课程与普通物理课程在内容知识上既有相似之处,也有不同之处。然而,这两组教师在资格、经验和就业安置方面是否存在差异?鉴于上述情况,本研究审查了实地高级和普通水平物理教师在资格、经验和就业安排方面的分布情况,以期为决策收集数据,并报告性别代表性,确定实地的偏差和可能的补救措施。采用描述性调查法,以普通和高级物理教师水平量表(PTOALI)为工具,从三个州的225名物理教师中获取数据。普通教师资格和高级教师资格存在相似之处。普通水平教师的教学经验高于高级水平教师。在样本观众中发现女性物理教师的代表性不足。此外,抽样学校的物理教师数量有限,女性物理教师在抽样调查对象中的代表性不足。这项研究的结论是,在接受调查的三个州,需要更多合格的物理教师。高水平学校也需要有经验的物理教师。本研究建议培训和招聘足够数量的合格物理教师,以应对不断增加的愿意学习的人数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Ordinary and Advanced Level In-field Physics Teachers’ Qualification, Experience and Job Placement
Ordinary and advanced level physics teachers have similar responsibilities in impacting the knowledge of physics among learners. These responsibilities are premised around qualification, experience and job placement. Teachers’ experience has a place in the literature to influence physics performance. The curriculum of both advanced and ordinary level physics is with similarities and occasioned differences with respect to content knowledge. However, are there differences in the qualification, experience and job placement between these two sets of teachers? In view of the foregoing, this study examined advanced and ordinary level in-field physics teachers distribution vis a vis qualification, experience and job placement with a view to aggregate data for decision making, as well as, report gender representation, establish drift and possible remediation in the field. Descriptive research of the survey type was employed with Physics Teachers Ordinary and Advanced Level Inventory (PTOALI) as the instrument to elicit data from 225 physics teachers across the three states under review. Similarities exist in teachers’ qualification at ordinary and advance levels. Experience of teachers at ordinary level were higher than those teaching advanced level curriculum. Underrepresentation of female physics teachers was found among the sample audience. Also, physics teachers are limited in number across the sampled schools and that female physics teachers are under-represented within the sampled respondents. This study concludes that more qualified physics teachers are needed across the three states under review. Experienced physics teachers are also required in advanced level schools. This study recommends training and recruitment of adequate number of qualified physics teachers to cope with the surging number of willing learners. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: This journal publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy, and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. Moreover, this journal also covers the issues concerned with environmental education & environmental science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信