托妮·莫里森《仁慈》中早期美国的病态身体政治

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
MELUS Pub Date : 2022-02-26 DOI:10.1093/melus/mlac012
Srimayee Basu
{"title":"托妮·莫里森《仁慈》中早期美国的病态身体政治","authors":"Srimayee Basu","doi":"10.1093/melus/mlac012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay reads Toni Morrison’s A Mercy (2008) to reexamine the biopolitical role of proto-epidemiological discourse in the seventeenth-century Atlantic world. By focusing on the intersecting stories of malaise in the novel—The Great Plague of 1665 in London, smallpox outbreaks in colonial America, and disease and mass deaths on slave ships—I unpack the ways in which disease and its management played a role not only in preserving racial formations but also in producing them. Morrison’s repudiation of the notion of disease as a social equalizer forms the core of the essay’s inquiry, as I argue that materialist and historicist readings of early Atlantic world pandemics can help theorize the differential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on raced subjects. The essay also probes the interpretive possibilities of rereading medical histories by centering the narratives of Black and Indigenous women and examining the ways in which such an oppositional reading may mitigate the archival and conceptual gaps in our understanding of both disease and body normativity. Woven into these argumentative strands is a critical consideration of historical method. The essay demonstrates that Morrison’s rendering of medical history is more expansive than that of the conventional historical novel, as her attempt is not to recreate accounts of early American pandemics but rather to disrupt a linear progress narrative of Western medicine.","PeriodicalId":44959,"journal":{"name":"MELUS","volume":"65 1","pages":"162 - 185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Diseased Body Politic of Early America in Toni Morrison’s A Mercy\",\"authors\":\"Srimayee Basu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/melus/mlac012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay reads Toni Morrison’s A Mercy (2008) to reexamine the biopolitical role of proto-epidemiological discourse in the seventeenth-century Atlantic world. By focusing on the intersecting stories of malaise in the novel—The Great Plague of 1665 in London, smallpox outbreaks in colonial America, and disease and mass deaths on slave ships—I unpack the ways in which disease and its management played a role not only in preserving racial formations but also in producing them. Morrison’s repudiation of the notion of disease as a social equalizer forms the core of the essay’s inquiry, as I argue that materialist and historicist readings of early Atlantic world pandemics can help theorize the differential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on raced subjects. The essay also probes the interpretive possibilities of rereading medical histories by centering the narratives of Black and Indigenous women and examining the ways in which such an oppositional reading may mitigate the archival and conceptual gaps in our understanding of both disease and body normativity. Woven into these argumentative strands is a critical consideration of historical method. The essay demonstrates that Morrison’s rendering of medical history is more expansive than that of the conventional historical novel, as her attempt is not to recreate accounts of early American pandemics but rather to disrupt a linear progress narrative of Western medicine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MELUS\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"162 - 185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MELUS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/melus/mlac012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MELUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/melus/mlac012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文阅读托妮·莫里森的《仁慈》(2008),重新审视17世纪大西洋世界中原始流行病学话语的生物政治角色。通过关注小说中令人不安的相互交织的故事——1665年伦敦大瘟疫、美洲殖民地的天花爆发、奴隶船上的疾病和大规模死亡——我揭示了疾病及其管理不仅在保存种族形态方面发挥了作用,而且在制造种族形态方面也发挥了作用。莫里森对疾病作为社会均衡器的概念的否定构成了本文探究的核心,因为我认为,唯物主义和历史主义对早期大西洋世界流行病的解读可以帮助将COVID-19大流行对种族的不同影响理论化。本文还通过以黑人和土著妇女的叙述为中心,探讨了重读病史的解释可能性,并研究了这种对立阅读可能减轻我们对疾病和身体规范性理解中的档案和概念差距的方式。交织在这些争论线中的是对历史方法的批判性考虑。这篇文章表明,莫里森对医学史的描述比传统的历史小说更广泛,因为她的尝试不是重现早期美国流行病的描述,而是打破西方医学的线性发展叙述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Diseased Body Politic of Early America in Toni Morrison’s A Mercy
Abstract:This essay reads Toni Morrison’s A Mercy (2008) to reexamine the biopolitical role of proto-epidemiological discourse in the seventeenth-century Atlantic world. By focusing on the intersecting stories of malaise in the novel—The Great Plague of 1665 in London, smallpox outbreaks in colonial America, and disease and mass deaths on slave ships—I unpack the ways in which disease and its management played a role not only in preserving racial formations but also in producing them. Morrison’s repudiation of the notion of disease as a social equalizer forms the core of the essay’s inquiry, as I argue that materialist and historicist readings of early Atlantic world pandemics can help theorize the differential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on raced subjects. The essay also probes the interpretive possibilities of rereading medical histories by centering the narratives of Black and Indigenous women and examining the ways in which such an oppositional reading may mitigate the archival and conceptual gaps in our understanding of both disease and body normativity. Woven into these argumentative strands is a critical consideration of historical method. The essay demonstrates that Morrison’s rendering of medical history is more expansive than that of the conventional historical novel, as her attempt is not to recreate accounts of early American pandemics but rather to disrupt a linear progress narrative of Western medicine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MELUS
MELUS LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信