允许测量不确定度模型的诊断效率

IF 0.1 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
R. Haeckel, W. Wosniok, E. Gurr
{"title":"允许测量不确定度模型的诊断效率","authors":"R. Haeckel, W. Wosniok, E. Gurr","doi":"10.1515/labmed-2017-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Limits for measurement uncertainty related to analytical imprecision and bias are most appropriately defined by the magnitude of tolerable diagnostic errors. A common mean to characterize the consequence of these errors is the diagnostic efficiency, which, in the case of data from a non-diseased population, is the rate of true-positive results (specificity). Three models have been identified by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) for defining permissible uncertainty limits. Their model 1 is based on diagnostic requirements whereas models 2 and 3 do not primarily consider diagnostic errors. The present report links tolerable diagnostic error, empirical biological variation and the technical state of the art to derive the limits for measurement uncertainty. This approach combines the essential aspects of all three EFLM models and uses the diagnostic error, the clinically most relevant aspect, as the crucial criterion for the characterization of measurement uncertainty limits. The present approach is designed for the sole purpose of quality assurance.","PeriodicalId":49926,"journal":{"name":"Laboratoriumsmedizin-Journal of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"76 1","pages":"309 - 315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic efficiency in models for permissible measurement uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"R. Haeckel, W. Wosniok, E. Gurr\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/labmed-2017-0041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Limits for measurement uncertainty related to analytical imprecision and bias are most appropriately defined by the magnitude of tolerable diagnostic errors. A common mean to characterize the consequence of these errors is the diagnostic efficiency, which, in the case of data from a non-diseased population, is the rate of true-positive results (specificity). Three models have been identified by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) for defining permissible uncertainty limits. Their model 1 is based on diagnostic requirements whereas models 2 and 3 do not primarily consider diagnostic errors. The present report links tolerable diagnostic error, empirical biological variation and the technical state of the art to derive the limits for measurement uncertainty. This approach combines the essential aspects of all three EFLM models and uses the diagnostic error, the clinically most relevant aspect, as the crucial criterion for the characterization of measurement uncertainty limits. The present approach is designed for the sole purpose of quality assurance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laboratoriumsmedizin-Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"309 - 315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laboratoriumsmedizin-Journal of Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2017-0041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratoriumsmedizin-Journal of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2017-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

与分析不精度和偏差相关的测量不确定度的限制是由可容忍的诊断误差的大小来定义的。表征这些错误后果的常见方法是诊断效率,即来自非患病人群的数据的真阳性结果率(特异性)。欧洲临床化学和检验医学联合会(EFLM)确定了三个模型来定义允许的不确定度限值。他们的模型1基于诊断要求,而模型2和模型3并不主要考虑诊断错误。本报告将可容忍的诊断误差、经验性生物变异和技术水平联系起来,得出测量不确定度的限度。该方法结合了所有三种EFLM模型的基本方面,并使用诊断误差(临床上最相关的方面)作为表征测量不确定度限值的关键标准。目前的方法设计的唯一目的是保证质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic efficiency in models for permissible measurement uncertainty
Abstract Limits for measurement uncertainty related to analytical imprecision and bias are most appropriately defined by the magnitude of tolerable diagnostic errors. A common mean to characterize the consequence of these errors is the diagnostic efficiency, which, in the case of data from a non-diseased population, is the rate of true-positive results (specificity). Three models have been identified by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) for defining permissible uncertainty limits. Their model 1 is based on diagnostic requirements whereas models 2 and 3 do not primarily consider diagnostic errors. The present report links tolerable diagnostic error, empirical biological variation and the technical state of the art to derive the limits for measurement uncertainty. This approach combines the essential aspects of all three EFLM models and uses the diagnostic error, the clinically most relevant aspect, as the crucial criterion for the characterization of measurement uncertainty limits. The present approach is designed for the sole purpose of quality assurance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信