效用非加性时投资基金选择问题中最大回撤的相关性

Daehwan Kim
{"title":"效用非加性时投资基金选择问题中最大回撤的相关性","authors":"Daehwan Kim","doi":"10.17256/JER.2011.16.3.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the circumstances under which maximum drawdown becomes relevant to a rational investor’s choice of an investment fund. We adopt the framework of the nonadditive expected utility theory of Schmeidler, and consider the consequence of extreme uncertainty over cash flow and also of extreme uncertainty aversion. We show that an investor facing extreme uncertainty makes a choice based on maximum drawdown. We also show that an extremely uncertainty-averse investor makes a choice based on maximum drawdown even if uncertainty is not extreme. An implication for the mean-variance analysis of Markowitz is discussed as well.","PeriodicalId":90860,"journal":{"name":"International journal of economic research","volume":"18 1","pages":"257-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relevance of Maximum Drawdown in the Investment Fund Selection Problem When Utility is Nonadditive\",\"authors\":\"Daehwan Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.17256/JER.2011.16.3.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the circumstances under which maximum drawdown becomes relevant to a rational investor’s choice of an investment fund. We adopt the framework of the nonadditive expected utility theory of Schmeidler, and consider the consequence of extreme uncertainty over cash flow and also of extreme uncertainty aversion. We show that an investor facing extreme uncertainty makes a choice based on maximum drawdown. We also show that an extremely uncertainty-averse investor makes a choice based on maximum drawdown even if uncertainty is not extreme. An implication for the mean-variance analysis of Markowitz is discussed as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of economic research\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"257-289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of economic research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17256/JER.2011.16.3.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of economic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17256/JER.2011.16.3.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文探讨了在何种情况下,最大回调与理性投资者对投资基金的选择相关。本文采用Schmeidler的非可加性期望效用理论框架,考虑了极端不确定性对现金流量的影响以及极端不确定性厌恶的影响。我们表明,面对极端不确定性的投资者会根据最大回撤做出选择。我们还表明,即使不确定性并不极端,极度厌恶不确定性的投资者也会根据最大回撤做出选择。本文还讨论了马科维茨均值方差分析的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relevance of Maximum Drawdown in the Investment Fund Selection Problem When Utility is Nonadditive
This paper explores the circumstances under which maximum drawdown becomes relevant to a rational investor’s choice of an investment fund. We adopt the framework of the nonadditive expected utility theory of Schmeidler, and consider the consequence of extreme uncertainty over cash flow and also of extreme uncertainty aversion. We show that an investor facing extreme uncertainty makes a choice based on maximum drawdown. We also show that an extremely uncertainty-averse investor makes a choice based on maximum drawdown even if uncertainty is not extreme. An implication for the mean-variance analysis of Markowitz is discussed as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信