重大非急诊手术输血:迫切需要显著降低其适应证

O. Centurión,  Juan Diosnel Cáceres
{"title":"重大非急诊手术输血:迫切需要显著降低其适应证","authors":"O. Centurión,  Juan Diosnel Cáceres","doi":"10.15406/jccr.2019.12.00452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lammi JP et al.14 studied the use of blood transfusions in 1404 patients undergoing pancreatic resections in Finland. The authors tried to improve and unify blood transfusion (BT) policies in order to decrease and optimize the use of blood products. They found no differences among high, medium and, low-volume centers in BT utilization, trigger points or the use of reserved blood units after pancreatoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy. Although, only minor changes in BT trends were found, the lowering of the transfusion trigger point and the best use of reserved blood units occurred only in high-volume centers.14 This is already a plausible finding since there is compelling evidence indicating that BT is excessive and sometimes unnecessary worldwide. Nearly 14million units of blood are donated annually in the USA, and about 4million people receive BT every year.15,16 Blood transfusion administration in surgical and critical care settings varies between 30-100% of patients. Lammi JP et al.14 observed that 65.9% of their study patients received BT. The mean number of red BT units was 5.22/patient (1.9–8.76). The mean trigger point for BT was an Hb level of 8.6g/dL. The mean percentage of blood units used out of the reserved red blood was 63.4%. We can see that the percentage of BT is still elevated, the trigger Hb level and the utilization of reserved blood units is also high. Although, the authors did not mention BT related complications in their study, the utilization of reserved blood is strongly associated to ischemic complications. Stored red blood cells are known to have decreased 2,3 DPG in the cell membrane, hence, they are less deformable, less likely to deliver oxygen to the tissues, and with greater tendency to produce capillary obstruction.16 On the other hand, the mechanisms responsible for the increased incidence of infectious complications are due to the immunosuppressive effects of BT. Administration of blood products causes profound negative effects on the human immune system, a condition termed transfusion-related immune modulation.17 Another reason to decrease BT is the fact that blood donations have significantly diminished mainly because of decreasing number of qualified donors.18 This fact has resulted in a shortage of blood supply in blood banks worldwide which makes it necessary to seek out new treatment options.19 Although, alternatives to BT and other treatment options exist, they are seldom utilized.","PeriodicalId":15200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiology & Current Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood transfusion in major non-emergency surgery: The urgent necessity to significantly decrease its indication\",\"authors\":\"O. Centurión,  Juan Diosnel Cáceres\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/jccr.2019.12.00452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lammi JP et al.14 studied the use of blood transfusions in 1404 patients undergoing pancreatic resections in Finland. The authors tried to improve and unify blood transfusion (BT) policies in order to decrease and optimize the use of blood products. They found no differences among high, medium and, low-volume centers in BT utilization, trigger points or the use of reserved blood units after pancreatoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy. Although, only minor changes in BT trends were found, the lowering of the transfusion trigger point and the best use of reserved blood units occurred only in high-volume centers.14 This is already a plausible finding since there is compelling evidence indicating that BT is excessive and sometimes unnecessary worldwide. Nearly 14million units of blood are donated annually in the USA, and about 4million people receive BT every year.15,16 Blood transfusion administration in surgical and critical care settings varies between 30-100% of patients. Lammi JP et al.14 observed that 65.9% of their study patients received BT. The mean number of red BT units was 5.22/patient (1.9–8.76). The mean trigger point for BT was an Hb level of 8.6g/dL. The mean percentage of blood units used out of the reserved red blood was 63.4%. We can see that the percentage of BT is still elevated, the trigger Hb level and the utilization of reserved blood units is also high. Although, the authors did not mention BT related complications in their study, the utilization of reserved blood is strongly associated to ischemic complications. Stored red blood cells are known to have decreased 2,3 DPG in the cell membrane, hence, they are less deformable, less likely to deliver oxygen to the tissues, and with greater tendency to produce capillary obstruction.16 On the other hand, the mechanisms responsible for the increased incidence of infectious complications are due to the immunosuppressive effects of BT. Administration of blood products causes profound negative effects on the human immune system, a condition termed transfusion-related immune modulation.17 Another reason to decrease BT is the fact that blood donations have significantly diminished mainly because of decreasing number of qualified donors.18 This fact has resulted in a shortage of blood supply in blood banks worldwide which makes it necessary to seek out new treatment options.19 Although, alternatives to BT and other treatment options exist, they are seldom utilized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiology & Current Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiology & Current Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/jccr.2019.12.00452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiology & Current Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/jccr.2019.12.00452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Lammi JP等14研究了芬兰1404例胰腺切除术患者的输血情况。作者试图完善和统一输血政策,以减少和优化血液制品的使用。他们发现,在胰十二指肠切除术或全胰切除术后,高、中、低容量中心在BT利用、触发点或储备血单位的使用方面没有差异。虽然在BT趋势中只发现了微小的变化,但输血触发点的降低和储备血液单位的最佳使用仅发生在大容量中心这已经是一个合理的发现,因为有令人信服的证据表明,BT在世界范围内是过度的,有时是不必要的。在美国,每年有近1400万单位的血液被捐献,每年约有400万人接受BT治疗。15,16外科和重症监护环境中的输血管理在30-100%的患者之间变化。Lammi JP等14观察到65.9%的患者接受了BT,平均红色BT单位为5.22/患者(1.9-8.76)。BT的平均触发点是Hb水平8.6g/dL。红细胞储备的平均用血量百分比为63.4%。我们可以看到,BT百分比仍然升高,触发Hb水平和储备血单位利用率也很高。虽然作者在他们的研究中没有提到BT相关的并发症,但储备血的使用与缺血性并发症密切相关。已知储存的红细胞减少了细胞膜中的2,3 DPG,因此,它们不易变形,不太可能向组织输送氧气,并且更容易产生毛细血管阻塞另一方面,感染并发症发生率增加的机制是由于BT的免疫抑制作用,血液制品的管理会对人体免疫系统产生深远的负面影响,这种情况称为输血相关免疫调节减少BT的另一个原因是献血显著减少,这主要是由于合格献血者数量的减少这一事实导致世界各地血库的血液供应短缺,因此有必要寻求新的治疗方案虽然存在BT和其他治疗方案的替代方案,但它们很少被利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blood transfusion in major non-emergency surgery: The urgent necessity to significantly decrease its indication
Lammi JP et al.14 studied the use of blood transfusions in 1404 patients undergoing pancreatic resections in Finland. The authors tried to improve and unify blood transfusion (BT) policies in order to decrease and optimize the use of blood products. They found no differences among high, medium and, low-volume centers in BT utilization, trigger points or the use of reserved blood units after pancreatoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy. Although, only minor changes in BT trends were found, the lowering of the transfusion trigger point and the best use of reserved blood units occurred only in high-volume centers.14 This is already a plausible finding since there is compelling evidence indicating that BT is excessive and sometimes unnecessary worldwide. Nearly 14million units of blood are donated annually in the USA, and about 4million people receive BT every year.15,16 Blood transfusion administration in surgical and critical care settings varies between 30-100% of patients. Lammi JP et al.14 observed that 65.9% of their study patients received BT. The mean number of red BT units was 5.22/patient (1.9–8.76). The mean trigger point for BT was an Hb level of 8.6g/dL. The mean percentage of blood units used out of the reserved red blood was 63.4%. We can see that the percentage of BT is still elevated, the trigger Hb level and the utilization of reserved blood units is also high. Although, the authors did not mention BT related complications in their study, the utilization of reserved blood is strongly associated to ischemic complications. Stored red blood cells are known to have decreased 2,3 DPG in the cell membrane, hence, they are less deformable, less likely to deliver oxygen to the tissues, and with greater tendency to produce capillary obstruction.16 On the other hand, the mechanisms responsible for the increased incidence of infectious complications are due to the immunosuppressive effects of BT. Administration of blood products causes profound negative effects on the human immune system, a condition termed transfusion-related immune modulation.17 Another reason to decrease BT is the fact that blood donations have significantly diminished mainly because of decreasing number of qualified donors.18 This fact has resulted in a shortage of blood supply in blood banks worldwide which makes it necessary to seek out new treatment options.19 Although, alternatives to BT and other treatment options exist, they are seldom utilized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信