肾脏替代疗法和全球问题:世界经验和我们的挑战

D. Ivanov
{"title":"肾脏替代疗法和全球问题:世界经验和我们的挑战","authors":"D. Ivanov","doi":"10.22141/2307-1257.11.1.2022.358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of renal replacement therapy (RRT) is relevant in today’s world due to a large number of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). According to current data, about 10–11 % of people suffer from CKD, of which up to 5 % need RRT. Unfortunately, the number of people with CKD in the world is increasing, which determines the growing need for RRT. There are three types of RRT, namely: hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation. Kidney transplantation is the most effective method of RRT, but its possibilities in the world are limited. Therefore, most people receive hemo- or peritoneal dialysis. But the long-term effects of choosing a dialysis method are not always predictable. The peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis show similar effectiveness during the first two years. Subsequent studies compa­ring the efficacy of the two methods do not provide a clear picture due to differences in patient initial parameters and differences in treatment initiation time. It is clear that peritoneal dialysis can have significant advantages in low-income countries due to the resource costs of the latter. The known benefits of peritoneal dialysis, such as flexibility of use, high quality of life, and preservation of residual renal function, increase its attractiveness, especially for young people with stage 5 CKD. The main strategies today are timely detection and prevention of CKD, control of comorbidities, as well as the development of documents and recommendations for standardization and improving the quality of renal replacement therapy.","PeriodicalId":17874,"journal":{"name":"KIDNEYS","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kidney replacement therapy and global issues: world experience and our challenges\",\"authors\":\"D. Ivanov\",\"doi\":\"10.22141/2307-1257.11.1.2022.358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of renal replacement therapy (RRT) is relevant in today’s world due to a large number of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). According to current data, about 10–11 % of people suffer from CKD, of which up to 5 % need RRT. Unfortunately, the number of people with CKD in the world is increasing, which determines the growing need for RRT. There are three types of RRT, namely: hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation. Kidney transplantation is the most effective method of RRT, but its possibilities in the world are limited. Therefore, most people receive hemo- or peritoneal dialysis. But the long-term effects of choosing a dialysis method are not always predictable. The peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis show similar effectiveness during the first two years. Subsequent studies compa­ring the efficacy of the two methods do not provide a clear picture due to differences in patient initial parameters and differences in treatment initiation time. It is clear that peritoneal dialysis can have significant advantages in low-income countries due to the resource costs of the latter. The known benefits of peritoneal dialysis, such as flexibility of use, high quality of life, and preservation of residual renal function, increase its attractiveness, especially for young people with stage 5 CKD. The main strategies today are timely detection and prevention of CKD, control of comorbidities, as well as the development of documents and recommendations for standardization and improving the quality of renal replacement therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KIDNEYS\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KIDNEYS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22141/2307-1257.11.1.2022.358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KIDNEYS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22141/2307-1257.11.1.2022.358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肾脏替代治疗(RRT)的问题在当今世界是相关的,因为大量的人患有慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)。根据目前的数据,约有10 - 11%的人患有慢性肾病,其中高达5%的人需要RRT。不幸的是,世界上CKD患者的数量正在增加,这决定了对RRT的需求日益增长。RRT有三种类型,即血液透析、腹膜透析和肾移植。肾移植是最有效的RRT方法,但其在世界范围内的可能性有限。因此,大多数人接受血液透析或腹膜透析。但是选择一种透析方法的长期影响并不总是可以预测的。腹膜透析和血液透析在头两年显示出相似的效果。由于患者初始参数和治疗起始时间的差异,后续比较两种方法疗效的研究并没有提供一个清晰的画面。很明显,由于后者的资源成本,腹膜透析在低收入国家具有显著的优势。腹膜透析的已知好处,如使用的灵活性、高生活质量和保留残余肾功能,增加了它的吸引力,特别是对5期CKD的年轻人。目前的主要策略是及时发现和预防CKD,控制合并症,以及制定标准化和提高肾脏替代治疗质量的文件和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kidney replacement therapy and global issues: world experience and our challenges
The problem of renal replacement therapy (RRT) is relevant in today’s world due to a large number of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). According to current data, about 10–11 % of people suffer from CKD, of which up to 5 % need RRT. Unfortunately, the number of people with CKD in the world is increasing, which determines the growing need for RRT. There are three types of RRT, namely: hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation. Kidney transplantation is the most effective method of RRT, but its possibilities in the world are limited. Therefore, most people receive hemo- or peritoneal dialysis. But the long-term effects of choosing a dialysis method are not always predictable. The peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis show similar effectiveness during the first two years. Subsequent studies compa­ring the efficacy of the two methods do not provide a clear picture due to differences in patient initial parameters and differences in treatment initiation time. It is clear that peritoneal dialysis can have significant advantages in low-income countries due to the resource costs of the latter. The known benefits of peritoneal dialysis, such as flexibility of use, high quality of life, and preservation of residual renal function, increase its attractiveness, especially for young people with stage 5 CKD. The main strategies today are timely detection and prevention of CKD, control of comorbidities, as well as the development of documents and recommendations for standardization and improving the quality of renal replacement therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信