环境保护/开发的差异心理学

IF 0.7 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
T. Milfont
{"title":"环境保护/开发的差异心理学","authors":"T. Milfont","doi":"10.1080/21711976.2021.1954394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Differential psychology focuses on how individuals vary in the way they think, feel and act by measuring differences that distinguish them as more similar to themselves over time and across situations than other individuals. In this article I review and discuss available evidence on key individual differences associated with protection and exploitation of the natural environment. The discussion centres on personality traits, basic human values, time perspective and system-justifying ideological orientations. Environmental protection has been shown to be consistently related to higher levels of Openness to Experience and Agreeableness (and somewhat Honesty-Humility) traits, Self-Transcendence and Openness to Change values and future thinking. Conversely, environmental exploitation is consistently related to higher levels of conservative political orientation, Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation. Individual differences research provides useful theoretical information that can have applied benefits in designing communication strategies to bring individuals less prone to protect the natural environment on board. Issues with jangle fallacy (measures with different names might not necessarily assess different things) and directions for future research are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":55641,"journal":{"name":"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental","volume":"60 1","pages":"398 - 427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The differential psychology of environmental protection/exploitation (La psicología diferencial de la protección/explotación medioambiental)\",\"authors\":\"T. Milfont\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21711976.2021.1954394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Differential psychology focuses on how individuals vary in the way they think, feel and act by measuring differences that distinguish them as more similar to themselves over time and across situations than other individuals. In this article I review and discuss available evidence on key individual differences associated with protection and exploitation of the natural environment. The discussion centres on personality traits, basic human values, time perspective and system-justifying ideological orientations. Environmental protection has been shown to be consistently related to higher levels of Openness to Experience and Agreeableness (and somewhat Honesty-Humility) traits, Self-Transcendence and Openness to Change values and future thinking. Conversely, environmental exploitation is consistently related to higher levels of conservative political orientation, Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation. Individual differences research provides useful theoretical information that can have applied benefits in designing communication strategies to bring individuals less prone to protect the natural environment on board. Issues with jangle fallacy (measures with different names might not necessarily assess different things) and directions for future research are also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"398 - 427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2021.1954394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psyecology-Revista Bilingue de Psicologia Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2021.1954394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

差异心理学关注的是个体在思考、感受和行动方式上的差异,通过测量这些差异,使他们在不同的时间和情况下比其他个体更接近自己。在这篇文章中,我回顾和讨论了与保护和开发自然环境相关的关键个体差异的现有证据。讨论主要集中在人格特征、人的基本价值观、时间观和制度正当化的思想取向等方面。环境保护已被证明与更高水平的经验开放性和宜人性(以及一些诚实-谦卑)特征、自我超越和对改变价值观和未来思考的开放性有关。反之,环境开发与较高程度的保守政治倾向、右翼威权主义倾向和社会支配倾向始终相关。个体差异研究提供了有用的理论信息,可以在设计沟通策略方面具有应用效益,从而使个体不太倾向于保护船上的自然环境。本文还讨论了噪音谬误(不同名称的测量不一定评估不同的事物)的问题和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The differential psychology of environmental protection/exploitation (La psicología diferencial de la protección/explotación medioambiental)
ABSTRACT Differential psychology focuses on how individuals vary in the way they think, feel and act by measuring differences that distinguish them as more similar to themselves over time and across situations than other individuals. In this article I review and discuss available evidence on key individual differences associated with protection and exploitation of the natural environment. The discussion centres on personality traits, basic human values, time perspective and system-justifying ideological orientations. Environmental protection has been shown to be consistently related to higher levels of Openness to Experience and Agreeableness (and somewhat Honesty-Humility) traits, Self-Transcendence and Openness to Change values and future thinking. Conversely, environmental exploitation is consistently related to higher levels of conservative political orientation, Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation. Individual differences research provides useful theoretical information that can have applied benefits in designing communication strategies to bring individuals less prone to protect the natural environment on board. Issues with jangle fallacy (measures with different names might not necessarily assess different things) and directions for future research are also discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信