剖宫产术中预防脊髓麻醉所致低血压晶体预压与共压的比较

M. Haque, M. Aleem, Arif Imtiyaz Chowdhury, A. Islam
{"title":"剖宫产术中预防脊髓麻醉所致低血压晶体预压与共压的比较","authors":"M. Haque, M. Aleem, Arif Imtiyaz Chowdhury, A. Islam","doi":"10.3329/jbsa.v30i2.66231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Preloading of crystalloid is a traditional practice to prevent spinal anaesthesia inducedhypotension. But co-loading seems to be more physiological and rational approach as effect was achievedduring the time of spinal anaesthesia.\nAims: To compare the efficacy of crystalloid preloading and co-loading for prevention of hypotensionduring spinal anaesthesia in caesarean section.\nMethods: This study was conducted in Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care, CombinedMilitary Hospital (CMH), Chittagong. Study was carried out over a period of six months from January toJune 2017. Total 80 patients (40 in each group) were included in this study. Patients with ASA grade 1& 2, aged 18-40 years were included. Patients with complicated pregnancy or failed spinal were excluded.Group-P (Preload group) received 15ml/kg Crystalloid solution (Hartmann’s solution/lactated Ringer’ssolution), 20 min before administration of spinal anaesthesia. Group-C (Co-load group) received bolus of15 ml/kg Crystalloid solution (Hartmann’s solution /lactated Ringer’s solution) at time of administrationof spinal anaesthesia. Blood pressure was recorded at 1, 2, 3, 5 & 10 minutes. Patients received vasopressorswhen mean blood pressure reduced below 20 mm of Hg or systolic blood pressure dropped below 90mmHg.\nResults: Total study population was 80 patients underwent caesarean section. Mean age of the patientswas 28.36±5.08 years and 28.25±5.06 years in group-P and C, respectively. Overall hypotension was notedin 23 patients (57.5%) of group-P and 19 patients (47.5%) of group-C. The difference between two groupswas statistically insignificant (p=0.241). After induction of spinal anaesthesia at 1 minute hypotensionwas noted in 7 patients (17.5%) of group-P and in 13 patients (32.5%) of group-C, at 2 minutes in 21patients (52.5%) of group-P and in 22 patients (55%) of group-C, at 3 minutes in 23 patients (57.5%) ofgroup-P and in 24 patients (60.0%) of group-C, at 5 minutes in 17 patients (42.5%) of group-P and in 19patients (47.5%) of group-C, at 10 minutes in 13 patients (32.5%) of group-P and in 7 patients (17.5%) ofgroup-C hypotension was developed.\nConclusion: Both preloading and co-loading with 15 ml/kg of Crystalloid solution (Hartmann’s solution/lactated Ringer’s solution) when used alone, are ineffective for the prevention of hypotension in caesareansection receiving spinal anaesthesia. We recommend frequent monitoring of maternal blood pressure andprompt treatment of maternal hypotension with vasopressors for better neonatal outcomes.\nJBSA 2017; 30(2): 83-89","PeriodicalId":17242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","volume":"299 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Crystalloid Preloading and Co-Loading to Prevent Spinal Anaesthesia Induced Hypotension in Caesarean Section\",\"authors\":\"M. Haque, M. Aleem, Arif Imtiyaz Chowdhury, A. Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/jbsa.v30i2.66231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Preloading of crystalloid is a traditional practice to prevent spinal anaesthesia inducedhypotension. But co-loading seems to be more physiological and rational approach as effect was achievedduring the time of spinal anaesthesia.\\nAims: To compare the efficacy of crystalloid preloading and co-loading for prevention of hypotensionduring spinal anaesthesia in caesarean section.\\nMethods: This study was conducted in Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care, CombinedMilitary Hospital (CMH), Chittagong. Study was carried out over a period of six months from January toJune 2017. Total 80 patients (40 in each group) were included in this study. Patients with ASA grade 1& 2, aged 18-40 years were included. Patients with complicated pregnancy or failed spinal were excluded.Group-P (Preload group) received 15ml/kg Crystalloid solution (Hartmann’s solution/lactated Ringer’ssolution), 20 min before administration of spinal anaesthesia. Group-C (Co-load group) received bolus of15 ml/kg Crystalloid solution (Hartmann’s solution /lactated Ringer’s solution) at time of administrationof spinal anaesthesia. Blood pressure was recorded at 1, 2, 3, 5 & 10 minutes. Patients received vasopressorswhen mean blood pressure reduced below 20 mm of Hg or systolic blood pressure dropped below 90mmHg.\\nResults: Total study population was 80 patients underwent caesarean section. Mean age of the patientswas 28.36±5.08 years and 28.25±5.06 years in group-P and C, respectively. Overall hypotension was notedin 23 patients (57.5%) of group-P and 19 patients (47.5%) of group-C. The difference between two groupswas statistically insignificant (p=0.241). After induction of spinal anaesthesia at 1 minute hypotensionwas noted in 7 patients (17.5%) of group-P and in 13 patients (32.5%) of group-C, at 2 minutes in 21patients (52.5%) of group-P and in 22 patients (55%) of group-C, at 3 minutes in 23 patients (57.5%) ofgroup-P and in 24 patients (60.0%) of group-C, at 5 minutes in 17 patients (42.5%) of group-P and in 19patients (47.5%) of group-C, at 10 minutes in 13 patients (32.5%) of group-P and in 7 patients (17.5%) ofgroup-C hypotension was developed.\\nConclusion: Both preloading and co-loading with 15 ml/kg of Crystalloid solution (Hartmann’s solution/lactated Ringer’s solution) when used alone, are ineffective for the prevention of hypotension in caesareansection receiving spinal anaesthesia. We recommend frequent monitoring of maternal blood pressure andprompt treatment of maternal hypotension with vasopressors for better neonatal outcomes.\\nJBSA 2017; 30(2): 83-89\",\"PeriodicalId\":17242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists\",\"volume\":\"299 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v30i2.66231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v30i2.66231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:晶体预压是预防脊髓麻醉所致低血压的传统做法。但在脊髓麻醉期间,共负荷似乎是更生理和合理的方法。目的:比较剖宫产脊柱麻醉时晶体预压与共压预防低血压的效果。方法:本研究在吉大港军队联合医院麻醉、镇痛及重症监护科进行。研究在2017年1月至6月的6个月内进行。本研究共纳入80例患者,每组40例。ASA 1级和2级患者,年龄18-40岁。排除妊娠并发症或脊柱衰竭患者。p组(预负荷组)在脊髓麻醉前20分钟,给予结晶液(哈特曼溶液/乳酸林格氏液)15ml/kg。c组(共负荷组)在给药时给予15 ml/kg晶体溶液(哈特曼溶液/乳酸林格氏液)。分别在1、2、3、5、10分钟记录血压。当平均血压降至20mmhg以下或收缩压降至90mmHg以下时,患者接受血管加压药物治疗。结果:总研究人群为80例剖腹产患者。p组患者平均年龄28.36±5.08岁,C组患者平均年龄28.25±5.06岁。p组23例(57.5%)、c组19例(47.5%)出现整体低血压。两组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.241)。p组7例(17.5%),c组13例(32.5%),p组21例(52.5%),c组22例(55%),p组23例(57.5%),c组24例(60.0%),p组17例(42.5%),c组19例(47.5%),p组麻醉诱导后1分钟出现低血压。p组13例(32.5%)和c组7例(17.5%)在10分钟出现低血压。结论:单独使用15 ml/kg的Crystalloid溶液(哈特曼溶液/乳酸林格氏液)预载和共载对预防脊髓麻醉剖宫产术后低血压均无效。我们建议经常监测产妇血压,并及时使用血管加压药物治疗低血压,以获得更好的新生儿结局。JBSA 2017;30 (2): 83 - 89
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Crystalloid Preloading and Co-Loading to Prevent Spinal Anaesthesia Induced Hypotension in Caesarean Section
Background: Preloading of crystalloid is a traditional practice to prevent spinal anaesthesia inducedhypotension. But co-loading seems to be more physiological and rational approach as effect was achievedduring the time of spinal anaesthesia. Aims: To compare the efficacy of crystalloid preloading and co-loading for prevention of hypotensionduring spinal anaesthesia in caesarean section. Methods: This study was conducted in Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care, CombinedMilitary Hospital (CMH), Chittagong. Study was carried out over a period of six months from January toJune 2017. Total 80 patients (40 in each group) were included in this study. Patients with ASA grade 1& 2, aged 18-40 years were included. Patients with complicated pregnancy or failed spinal were excluded.Group-P (Preload group) received 15ml/kg Crystalloid solution (Hartmann’s solution/lactated Ringer’ssolution), 20 min before administration of spinal anaesthesia. Group-C (Co-load group) received bolus of15 ml/kg Crystalloid solution (Hartmann’s solution /lactated Ringer’s solution) at time of administrationof spinal anaesthesia. Blood pressure was recorded at 1, 2, 3, 5 & 10 minutes. Patients received vasopressorswhen mean blood pressure reduced below 20 mm of Hg or systolic blood pressure dropped below 90mmHg. Results: Total study population was 80 patients underwent caesarean section. Mean age of the patientswas 28.36±5.08 years and 28.25±5.06 years in group-P and C, respectively. Overall hypotension was notedin 23 patients (57.5%) of group-P and 19 patients (47.5%) of group-C. The difference between two groupswas statistically insignificant (p=0.241). After induction of spinal anaesthesia at 1 minute hypotensionwas noted in 7 patients (17.5%) of group-P and in 13 patients (32.5%) of group-C, at 2 minutes in 21patients (52.5%) of group-P and in 22 patients (55%) of group-C, at 3 minutes in 23 patients (57.5%) ofgroup-P and in 24 patients (60.0%) of group-C, at 5 minutes in 17 patients (42.5%) of group-P and in 19patients (47.5%) of group-C, at 10 minutes in 13 patients (32.5%) of group-P and in 7 patients (17.5%) ofgroup-C hypotension was developed. Conclusion: Both preloading and co-loading with 15 ml/kg of Crystalloid solution (Hartmann’s solution/lactated Ringer’s solution) when used alone, are ineffective for the prevention of hypotension in caesareansection receiving spinal anaesthesia. We recommend frequent monitoring of maternal blood pressure andprompt treatment of maternal hypotension with vasopressors for better neonatal outcomes. JBSA 2017; 30(2): 83-89
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信