{"title":"阅读道德马基雅维利:最新评论","authors":"Miguel Fernández de la Peña","doi":"10.18042/CEPC/REP.192.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From a popular point of view, Machiavellianism is mainly understood as indifference to morality. Moreover, many scholars have conceived Niccolo Machiavelli as a political theorist who only paid attention to the rules of obtaining power. Contrasting with this interpretation, there are many diverse testimonies of the Machiavelli’s concern about morals. The main object of this article is to try to offer a unity perspective around this topic.","PeriodicalId":45899,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Estudios Politicos","volume":"28 1","pages":"67-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lecturas de un Maquiavelo moral: Una revisión actualizada\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Fernández de la Peña\",\"doi\":\"10.18042/CEPC/REP.192.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From a popular point of view, Machiavellianism is mainly understood as indifference to morality. Moreover, many scholars have conceived Niccolo Machiavelli as a political theorist who only paid attention to the rules of obtaining power. Contrasting with this interpretation, there are many diverse testimonies of the Machiavelli’s concern about morals. The main object of this article is to try to offer a unity perspective around this topic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista De Estudios Politicos\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"67-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista De Estudios Politicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18042/CEPC/REP.192.03\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Estudios Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18042/CEPC/REP.192.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lecturas de un Maquiavelo moral: Una revisión actualizada
From a popular point of view, Machiavellianism is mainly understood as indifference to morality. Moreover, many scholars have conceived Niccolo Machiavelli as a political theorist who only paid attention to the rules of obtaining power. Contrasting with this interpretation, there are many diverse testimonies of the Machiavelli’s concern about morals. The main object of this article is to try to offer a unity perspective around this topic.