家庭、戏剧、世界:从奥利弗·弗里季奇和达米尔·巴托尔·印多斯的戏剧中理解社区

Agata Juniku
{"title":"家庭、戏剧、世界:从奥利弗·弗里季奇和达米尔·巴托尔·印多斯的戏剧中理解社区","authors":"Agata Juniku","doi":"10.5937/zbaku2210036j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Damir Bartol Indoš is one of the still active veterans of the experimental theatre in Yugoslavia, and Oliver Frljić is one of the most important directors in today's post-Yugoslav space-time. The paper comparatively analyses two radical and in many ways mutually opposed types of politics and the corresponding aesthetico-poetic apparatus. These differences stem primarily from two completely different conceptions of the community, and consequently the ethico-political habitus that Indoš and Frljić affirm, both in their performances and beyond the artistic framework. Their poetics and actions, and to some extent methods, could be roughly based on the legacy of Artaud, with Frljić, and Brecht, with Indoš, but on many nodes of postdramatic aesthetics, these two poetico-aesthetic lines are met with both of them. Also, this paper tends to show that Artaud's and Brecht's theatre are not as distant as it is emphasised in textbooks, that is, it is insisted on the fact that their aesthetico-poetic, and especially ethico-political heritage is inseparably complementary. The opuses of Frljić and Indoš are also, after the initial distinction, approached with an emphasis on common points that may not be noticeable at first glance, but are clearly discernible from certain perspectives. Their different conceptions and artistic reflections of the community, on the other hand, are broken down into categories that differ in quality and scope - family, theatre, world - but within which, as in onion, relations remain structurally the same.","PeriodicalId":31481,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family, theatre, world: Understanding community in the plays of Oliver Frljić and Damir Bartol Indoš\",\"authors\":\"Agata Juniku\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/zbaku2210036j\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Damir Bartol Indoš is one of the still active veterans of the experimental theatre in Yugoslavia, and Oliver Frljić is one of the most important directors in today's post-Yugoslav space-time. The paper comparatively analyses two radical and in many ways mutually opposed types of politics and the corresponding aesthetico-poetic apparatus. These differences stem primarily from two completely different conceptions of the community, and consequently the ethico-political habitus that Indoš and Frljić affirm, both in their performances and beyond the artistic framework. Their poetics and actions, and to some extent methods, could be roughly based on the legacy of Artaud, with Frljić, and Brecht, with Indoš, but on many nodes of postdramatic aesthetics, these two poetico-aesthetic lines are met with both of them. Also, this paper tends to show that Artaud's and Brecht's theatre are not as distant as it is emphasised in textbooks, that is, it is insisted on the fact that their aesthetico-poetic, and especially ethico-political heritage is inseparably complementary. The opuses of Frljić and Indoš are also, after the initial distinction, approached with an emphasis on common points that may not be noticeable at first glance, but are clearly discernible from certain perspectives. Their different conceptions and artistic reflections of the community, on the other hand, are broken down into categories that differ in quality and scope - family, theatre, world - but within which, as in onion, relations remain structurally the same.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/zbaku2210036j\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/zbaku2210036j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

达米尔·巴托尔·因多斯奇是南斯拉夫实验剧院中仍然活跃的老兵之一,奥利弗·弗里季奇是当今后南斯拉夫时代最重要的导演之一。本文比较分析了两种激进的、在许多方面相互对立的政治类型及其相应的诗学美体。这些差异主要源于两种完全不同的社区概念,因此,indoska和frljiki在他们的表演和艺术框架之外都肯定了伦理-政治习惯。他们的诗学和行为,以及某种程度上的方法,可以大致基于亚陶,弗里季奇,布莱希特,印多斯的遗产,但在后戏剧美学的许多节点上,这两种诗学美学路线同时满足了他们。此外,本文倾向于表明,亚陶和布莱希特的戏剧并不像教科书中强调的那样遥远,也就是说,它坚持认为他们的美学-诗歌,特别是伦理-政治遗产是不可分割的互补。在最初的区分之后,frljiki和indoska的作品也强调了第一眼可能不会注意到的共同点,但从某些角度来看,这些共同点是清晰可辨的。另一方面,他们对社区的不同观念和艺术反映,在质量和范围上被分成不同的类别——家庭、剧院、世界——但在这些类别中,就像洋葱一样,关系在结构上是相同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Family, theatre, world: Understanding community in the plays of Oliver Frljić and Damir Bartol Indoš
Damir Bartol Indoš is one of the still active veterans of the experimental theatre in Yugoslavia, and Oliver Frljić is one of the most important directors in today's post-Yugoslav space-time. The paper comparatively analyses two radical and in many ways mutually opposed types of politics and the corresponding aesthetico-poetic apparatus. These differences stem primarily from two completely different conceptions of the community, and consequently the ethico-political habitus that Indoš and Frljić affirm, both in their performances and beyond the artistic framework. Their poetics and actions, and to some extent methods, could be roughly based on the legacy of Artaud, with Frljić, and Brecht, with Indoš, but on many nodes of postdramatic aesthetics, these two poetico-aesthetic lines are met with both of them. Also, this paper tends to show that Artaud's and Brecht's theatre are not as distant as it is emphasised in textbooks, that is, it is insisted on the fact that their aesthetico-poetic, and especially ethico-political heritage is inseparably complementary. The opuses of Frljić and Indoš are also, after the initial distinction, approached with an emphasis on common points that may not be noticeable at first glance, but are clearly discernible from certain perspectives. Their different conceptions and artistic reflections of the community, on the other hand, are broken down into categories that differ in quality and scope - family, theatre, world - but within which, as in onion, relations remain structurally the same.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信