单发阵发性心房颤动患者仰卧时自主神经活动分析

Mário Oliveira
{"title":"单发阵发性心房颤动患者仰卧时自主神经活动分析","authors":"Mário Oliveira","doi":"10.15406/JCCR.2020.13.00478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The autonomic nervous system (ANS) has been recognized as an important modulator in the pathogenesis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Changes in ANS control of heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) variability occur during orthostatism to maintain cardiovascular homeostasis. The wavelet transform (WT) has been used as a tool that provides a time-frequency decomposition of the signal under investigation, allowing intermittent components to be elucidated. Aim: To study HR and BP variability with WT analysis in younger patients (P) with PAF and normal echocardiographic findings, and in healthy individuals (HI) during head-up tilt (HUT). Methods: 17P with lone PAF (age <60 years [33-59], 9 men) and 17 HI (<60years [20-59], 8 men) underwent passive HUT (70º) while on sinus rhythm. Continuous monitoring of ECG and BP was obtained without antiarrhythmic drug medication. Acute changes in RR-intervals and systolic BP were evaluated with WT, and LF (low-frequency power), HF (high-frequency power) and LF/HF calculated for 1) the last 2 minutes of the supine period; 2) the 15 seconds of tilting movement (TM); 3) 1st and 2nd minutes of HUT. Results: RR intervals were identical for the two groups in baseline and during HUT. Supine basal BP was similar for both groups. During HUT, two BP response profiles were observed: a sustained increase in PAF P, and a decrease followed by an increase and further recovery in HI. WT analysis of RR intervals for PAF P, when compared to HI, showed lower LF/HF values in the supine position (2.0±0.5 vs. 2.5±0.3, p<0.05), and a decreased LF power during TM (574±134 ms² vs. 1347±393 ms², p<0.05). In the 1st and 2nd minutes of HUT, changes were comparable in PAF P and in HI. Analysis of systolic BP for PAF P, compared to HI, showed statistically significant differences regarding lower HF values in basal (0.69±0.14 ms² vs 1.05±0.13 ms², p<0.05) and lower LF and LF/HF values during TM (6.3±2.5 ms² vs 8.2±1.6 ms², 8.4±2.9 vs 12.8±4.4; p<0.05). No differences were detected with respect to the 1st and 2nd minutes of HUT. Conclusion: P with PAF presented modified autonomic control of HR and BP in the supine position and during the initial phase of orthostatism. These findings suggest that wavelets analysis may provide a new insight into the assessment of the dynamicity of autonomic cardiovascular regulation and underscore the presence of ANS disturbances in PAF.","PeriodicalId":15200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiology & Current Research","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of autonomic activity during head-up tilt in patients with lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation\",\"authors\":\"Mário Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/JCCR.2020.13.00478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The autonomic nervous system (ANS) has been recognized as an important modulator in the pathogenesis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Changes in ANS control of heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) variability occur during orthostatism to maintain cardiovascular homeostasis. The wavelet transform (WT) has been used as a tool that provides a time-frequency decomposition of the signal under investigation, allowing intermittent components to be elucidated. Aim: To study HR and BP variability with WT analysis in younger patients (P) with PAF and normal echocardiographic findings, and in healthy individuals (HI) during head-up tilt (HUT). Methods: 17P with lone PAF (age <60 years [33-59], 9 men) and 17 HI (<60years [20-59], 8 men) underwent passive HUT (70º) while on sinus rhythm. Continuous monitoring of ECG and BP was obtained without antiarrhythmic drug medication. Acute changes in RR-intervals and systolic BP were evaluated with WT, and LF (low-frequency power), HF (high-frequency power) and LF/HF calculated for 1) the last 2 minutes of the supine period; 2) the 15 seconds of tilting movement (TM); 3) 1st and 2nd minutes of HUT. Results: RR intervals were identical for the two groups in baseline and during HUT. Supine basal BP was similar for both groups. During HUT, two BP response profiles were observed: a sustained increase in PAF P, and a decrease followed by an increase and further recovery in HI. WT analysis of RR intervals for PAF P, when compared to HI, showed lower LF/HF values in the supine position (2.0±0.5 vs. 2.5±0.3, p<0.05), and a decreased LF power during TM (574±134 ms² vs. 1347±393 ms², p<0.05). In the 1st and 2nd minutes of HUT, changes were comparable in PAF P and in HI. Analysis of systolic BP for PAF P, compared to HI, showed statistically significant differences regarding lower HF values in basal (0.69±0.14 ms² vs 1.05±0.13 ms², p<0.05) and lower LF and LF/HF values during TM (6.3±2.5 ms² vs 8.2±1.6 ms², 8.4±2.9 vs 12.8±4.4; p<0.05). No differences were detected with respect to the 1st and 2nd minutes of HUT. Conclusion: P with PAF presented modified autonomic control of HR and BP in the supine position and during the initial phase of orthostatism. These findings suggest that wavelets analysis may provide a new insight into the assessment of the dynamicity of autonomic cardiovascular regulation and underscore the presence of ANS disturbances in PAF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiology & Current Research\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiology & Current Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/JCCR.2020.13.00478\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiology & Current Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/JCCR.2020.13.00478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自主神经系统(ANS)在阵发性心房颤动(PAF)发病过程中起着重要的调节作用。在直立运动期间,ANS对心率(HR)和血压(BP)变异性的控制发生变化,以维持心血管稳态。小波变换(WT)已经被用作一种工具,它提供了被调查信号的时频分解,允许间歇性成分被阐明。目的:用WT分析研究有PAF和正常超声心动图表现的年轻患者(P)和头向倾斜(HUT)时健康个体(HI)的HR和BP变异性。方法:单发PAF患者17例(年龄<60岁[33-59],男性9例),HI患者17例(年龄<60岁[20-59],男性8例)在保持窦性心律时行被动HUT(70º)治疗。在不服用抗心律失常药物的情况下,连续监测心电图和血压。用WT评估rr -间期和收缩压的急性变化,并计算1)仰卧时间最后2分钟的LF(低频功率)、HF(高频功率)和LF/HF;2) 15秒的倾斜运动(TM);3) HUT第1、2分钟。结果:两组在基线和HUT期间的RR间期相同。两组的仰卧基础血压相似。在HUT期间,观察到两种BP反应谱:PAF P持续增加,HI下降后增加并进一步恢复。与HI相比,PAF P的RR区间WT分析显示,仰卧位时LF/HF值较低(2.0±0.5比2.5±0.3,P <0.05),而TM时LF功率较低(574±134 ms²比1347±393 ms²,P <0.05)。在HUT的第1分钟和第2分钟,PAF P和HI的变化具有可比性。与HI相比,PAF P的收缩压分析显示,基础阶段较低的HF值(0.69±0.14 ms²vs 1.05±0.13 ms²,P <0.05)和TM期间较低的LF和LF/HF值(6.3±2.5 ms²vs 8.2±1.6 ms²,8.4±2.9 vs 12.8±4.4)具有统计学意义;p < 0.05)。HUT的第1分钟和第2分钟没有差异。结论:PAF患者在仰卧位和直立初期对HR和BP的自主控制有所改善。这些发现表明,小波分析可能为评估自主心血管调节的动态提供新的见解,并强调了PAF中ANS干扰的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of autonomic activity during head-up tilt in patients with lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
The autonomic nervous system (ANS) has been recognized as an important modulator in the pathogenesis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Changes in ANS control of heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) variability occur during orthostatism to maintain cardiovascular homeostasis. The wavelet transform (WT) has been used as a tool that provides a time-frequency decomposition of the signal under investigation, allowing intermittent components to be elucidated. Aim: To study HR and BP variability with WT analysis in younger patients (P) with PAF and normal echocardiographic findings, and in healthy individuals (HI) during head-up tilt (HUT). Methods: 17P with lone PAF (age <60 years [33-59], 9 men) and 17 HI (<60years [20-59], 8 men) underwent passive HUT (70º) while on sinus rhythm. Continuous monitoring of ECG and BP was obtained without antiarrhythmic drug medication. Acute changes in RR-intervals and systolic BP were evaluated with WT, and LF (low-frequency power), HF (high-frequency power) and LF/HF calculated for 1) the last 2 minutes of the supine period; 2) the 15 seconds of tilting movement (TM); 3) 1st and 2nd minutes of HUT. Results: RR intervals were identical for the two groups in baseline and during HUT. Supine basal BP was similar for both groups. During HUT, two BP response profiles were observed: a sustained increase in PAF P, and a decrease followed by an increase and further recovery in HI. WT analysis of RR intervals for PAF P, when compared to HI, showed lower LF/HF values in the supine position (2.0±0.5 vs. 2.5±0.3, p<0.05), and a decreased LF power during TM (574±134 ms² vs. 1347±393 ms², p<0.05). In the 1st and 2nd minutes of HUT, changes were comparable in PAF P and in HI. Analysis of systolic BP for PAF P, compared to HI, showed statistically significant differences regarding lower HF values in basal (0.69±0.14 ms² vs 1.05±0.13 ms², p<0.05) and lower LF and LF/HF values during TM (6.3±2.5 ms² vs 8.2±1.6 ms², 8.4±2.9 vs 12.8±4.4; p<0.05). No differences were detected with respect to the 1st and 2nd minutes of HUT. Conclusion: P with PAF presented modified autonomic control of HR and BP in the supine position and during the initial phase of orthostatism. These findings suggest that wavelets analysis may provide a new insight into the assessment of the dynamicity of autonomic cardiovascular regulation and underscore the presence of ANS disturbances in PAF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信