{"title":"英国植物六个属的新组合","authors":"C. Stace","doi":"10.1080/20423489.2017.1344044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adoption of a molecular basis for the classification of the flora of the British Isles introduces the need for numerous new combinations. Many of these have been made by other authors for their particular purposes, but the following appear so far to be lacking. 1. Roemeria Medik. (Papaveraceae) It was shown by Morales et al. (1988) that our two prickly-fruited poppies have the pollen-type of the genus Roemeria rather than that of Papaver L., and molecular studies have confirmed this relationship. Morales et al.made the combination for Papaver argemone L. under Roemeria, but that for P. hybridum L. appears to be still wanting. The epithet hybrida is already taken in Roemeria, so the next earliest specific name has to be used as the basionym. Roemeria hispida (Lam.) Stace, comb. nov. Basionym: Papaver hispidum Lam., Fl. Franç. (Lamarck) 3: 174 (1779) Synonym: Papaver hybridum L. 2. Eythranthe Spach (Phrymaceae) Molecular data show that Mimulus L. should be split in order to maintain monophyletic genera (Barker et al., 2012; Nesom, 2012). All our taxa now belong to the genus Erythranthe, in which the following new combinations are required. Erythranthe x burnetii (S. Arn.) Silverside, comb. nov. Basionym: Mimulus x burnetii S. Arn., Gard. Chron., ser. 3, August 1","PeriodicalId":19229,"journal":{"name":"New Journal of Botany","volume":"62 1","pages":"10 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New combinations in six genera of the British flora\",\"authors\":\"C. Stace\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20423489.2017.1344044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The adoption of a molecular basis for the classification of the flora of the British Isles introduces the need for numerous new combinations. Many of these have been made by other authors for their particular purposes, but the following appear so far to be lacking. 1. Roemeria Medik. (Papaveraceae) It was shown by Morales et al. (1988) that our two prickly-fruited poppies have the pollen-type of the genus Roemeria rather than that of Papaver L., and molecular studies have confirmed this relationship. Morales et al.made the combination for Papaver argemone L. under Roemeria, but that for P. hybridum L. appears to be still wanting. The epithet hybrida is already taken in Roemeria, so the next earliest specific name has to be used as the basionym. Roemeria hispida (Lam.) Stace, comb. nov. Basionym: Papaver hispidum Lam., Fl. Franç. (Lamarck) 3: 174 (1779) Synonym: Papaver hybridum L. 2. Eythranthe Spach (Phrymaceae) Molecular data show that Mimulus L. should be split in order to maintain monophyletic genera (Barker et al., 2012; Nesom, 2012). All our taxa now belong to the genus Erythranthe, in which the following new combinations are required. Erythranthe x burnetii (S. Arn.) Silverside, comb. nov. Basionym: Mimulus x burnetii S. Arn., Gard. Chron., ser. 3, August 1\",\"PeriodicalId\":19229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Journal of Botany\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"10 - 9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Journal of Botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20423489.2017.1344044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20423489.2017.1344044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
采用分子分类法对不列颠群岛植物区系进行分类后,需要进行许多新的组合。其中许多是由其他作者为其特定目的而编写的,但到目前为止似乎还缺乏以下内容。1. Roemeria Medik。(Papaveraceae) Morales et al.(1988)表明,我们的两种多刺罂粟具有Roemeria属的花粉类型,而不是Papaver L.的花粉类型,分子研究证实了这种关系。Morales等人在Roemeria属下对Papaver argemone L.进行了组合,但对P. hybridum L.的组合似乎还缺乏。“杂交种”一词已经在罗美亚属中使用了,所以下一个最早的特定名称必须作为基名。黄花蔷薇Stace,梳子。十一月基础名:罂粟花。佛罗里达州Franç。(Lamarck) 3:174(1779)同义词:Papaver hybridum L.。分子数据表明,为了维持单系属,Mimulus L.应该被分裂(Barker et al., 2012;Nesom, 2012)。我们所有的分类群现在都属于赤藓属,其中需要下列新的组合。赤藓属植物(美国)牛臀肉,梳子。11月基础名词:拟南芥。加尔省。时间。,爵士。8月1日
New combinations in six genera of the British flora
The adoption of a molecular basis for the classification of the flora of the British Isles introduces the need for numerous new combinations. Many of these have been made by other authors for their particular purposes, but the following appear so far to be lacking. 1. Roemeria Medik. (Papaveraceae) It was shown by Morales et al. (1988) that our two prickly-fruited poppies have the pollen-type of the genus Roemeria rather than that of Papaver L., and molecular studies have confirmed this relationship. Morales et al.made the combination for Papaver argemone L. under Roemeria, but that for P. hybridum L. appears to be still wanting. The epithet hybrida is already taken in Roemeria, so the next earliest specific name has to be used as the basionym. Roemeria hispida (Lam.) Stace, comb. nov. Basionym: Papaver hispidum Lam., Fl. Franç. (Lamarck) 3: 174 (1779) Synonym: Papaver hybridum L. 2. Eythranthe Spach (Phrymaceae) Molecular data show that Mimulus L. should be split in order to maintain monophyletic genera (Barker et al., 2012; Nesom, 2012). All our taxa now belong to the genus Erythranthe, in which the following new combinations are required. Erythranthe x burnetii (S. Arn.) Silverside, comb. nov. Basionym: Mimulus x burnetii S. Arn., Gard. Chron., ser. 3, August 1