种族灭绝:一个被忽视的基本假设

Group Pub Date : 2022-01-13 DOI:10.13186/GROUP.42.3.0245
B. Roth
{"title":"种族灭绝:一个被忽视的基本假设","authors":"B. Roth","doi":"10.13186/GROUP.42.3.0245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Despite a voluminous literature on the Holocaust, following the discovery of mass murders, there was an absence of psychoanalytic investigation of “killing groups” or how they functioned. In its place, Pick describes how psychoanalytic theories retreated to theorize about superego development in children. So-called sanctioned violence offers no viable solution to the avoidance of studying violence or perpetrators. Destructive violence is justified by ideologies both before and after the violent events. The nature of Nazi group regression is explored as killing groups remain visible in society.","PeriodicalId":90511,"journal":{"name":"Group","volume":"49 1","pages":"245 - 257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genocide: An Overlooked Basic Assumption\",\"authors\":\"B. Roth\",\"doi\":\"10.13186/GROUP.42.3.0245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Despite a voluminous literature on the Holocaust, following the discovery of mass murders, there was an absence of psychoanalytic investigation of “killing groups” or how they functioned. In its place, Pick describes how psychoanalytic theories retreated to theorize about superego development in children. So-called sanctioned violence offers no viable solution to the avoidance of studying violence or perpetrators. Destructive violence is justified by ideologies both before and after the violent events. The nature of Nazi group regression is explored as killing groups remain visible in society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Group\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"245 - 257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Group\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13186/GROUP.42.3.0245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13186/GROUP.42.3.0245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:尽管有大量关于大屠杀的文献,但在发现大规模谋杀之后,却缺乏对“杀戮团体”及其运作方式的精神分析调查。取而代之的是,匹克描述了精神分析理论是如何退步到将儿童的超我发展理论化的。所谓的“受制裁的暴力”并不能为避免研究暴力或肇事者提供可行的解决办法。破坏性暴力在暴力事件发生前后都被意识形态所证明是正当的。纳粹团体回归的本质是探索杀戮团体在社会上仍然可见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genocide: An Overlooked Basic Assumption
Abstract:Despite a voluminous literature on the Holocaust, following the discovery of mass murders, there was an absence of psychoanalytic investigation of “killing groups” or how they functioned. In its place, Pick describes how psychoanalytic theories retreated to theorize about superego development in children. So-called sanctioned violence offers no viable solution to the avoidance of studying violence or perpetrators. Destructive violence is justified by ideologies both before and after the violent events. The nature of Nazi group regression is explored as killing groups remain visible in society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信