书面语言中条件句的日常使用

Q4 Psychology
Carlos Santamaría, Orlando Espino
{"title":"书面语言中条件句的日常使用","authors":"Carlos Santamaría, Orlando Espino","doi":"10.1174/021435598760389550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a normative study on the use of conditionals in written language. A sample of texts (total length 450.000 words) originally written in Spanish was used. A total of 408 conditionals were found. We analyzed the quality of the conditionals as simple indicative, biconditionals, counterfactual, deontic (obligations, permissions, etc.) or causal, and tested the frequency of use for each of these types of conditionals. For each of them, we also tested the order as direct (antecedent-consequent) or reverse (consequent-antecedent), and the use of negations in each of the components. The results were compared to the predictions of the main current theories of reasoning.","PeriodicalId":39889,"journal":{"name":"Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale","volume":"22 1","pages":"227-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usos cotidianos del condicional en el lenguaje escrito\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Santamaría, Orlando Espino\",\"doi\":\"10.1174/021435598760389550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a normative study on the use of conditionals in written language. A sample of texts (total length 450.000 words) originally written in Spanish was used. A total of 408 conditionals were found. We analyzed the quality of the conditionals as simple indicative, biconditionals, counterfactual, deontic (obligations, permissions, etc.) or causal, and tested the frequency of use for each of these types of conditionals. For each of them, we also tested the order as direct (antecedent-consequent) or reverse (consequent-antecedent), and the use of negations in each of the components. The results were compared to the predictions of the main current theories of reasoning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"227-238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1174/021435598760389550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1174/021435598760389550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对书面语条件句的使用进行了规范研究。原文样本(总长度45万字)用西班牙语写成。总共发现了408个条件句。我们分析了简单指示性条件句、双条件句、反事实条件句、道义条件句(义务、许可等)或因果条件句的质量,并测试了每种条件句的使用频率。对于每一个句子,我们也测试了它们的顺序是直接的(先行-结果)还是反向的(结果-先行),以及在每个组成部分中否定的使用。研究结果与当前主要推理理论的预测结果进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usos cotidianos del condicional en el lenguaje escrito
This paper presents a normative study on the use of conditionals in written language. A sample of texts (total length 450.000 words) originally written in Spanish was used. A total of 408 conditionals were found. We analyzed the quality of the conditionals as simple indicative, biconditionals, counterfactual, deontic (obligations, permissions, etc.) or causal, and tested the frequency of use for each of these types of conditionals. For each of them, we also tested the order as direct (antecedent-consequent) or reverse (consequent-antecedent), and the use of negations in each of the components. The results were compared to the predictions of the main current theories of reasoning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale
Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, rivista quadrimestrale, pubblica articoli originali che contribuiscono allo sviluppo delle conoscenze teoriche ed al progresso della prassi clinica in psicoterapia cognitiva comportamentale. Ricadono nell’ambito d’interesse della rivista le applicazioni delle metodologie cognitive e comportamentali all’individuo, alla famiglia, al gruppo delle organizzazioni. Nell’ambito d’interesse sono parimenti incluse la valutazione clinica (assessment), la medicina comportamentale, la riabilitazione, la metodologia, la ricerca "analogica", la ricerca di base e la ricerca interdisciplinare rilevante per la psicoterapia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信