时间网络中的代理中间性中心性排序

R. Becker, P. Crescenzi, A. Cruciani, Bojana Kodric
{"title":"时间网络中的代理中间性中心性排序","authors":"R. Becker, P. Crescenzi, A. Cruciani, Bojana Kodric","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2023.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identifying influential nodes in a network is arguably one of the most important tasks in graph mining and network analysis. A large variety of centrality measures, all aiming at correctly quantifying a node’s importance in the network, have been formulated in the literature. One of the most cited ones is the betweenness centrality , formally introduced by Freeman (Sociometry, 1977). On the other hand, researchers have recently been very interested in capturing the dynamic nature of real-world networks by studying temporal graphs , rather than static ones. Clearly, centrality measures, including the betweenness centrality, have also been extended to temporal graphs. Buß et al. (KDD, 2020) gave algorithms to compute various notions of temporal betweenness centrality, including the perhaps most natural one – shortest temporal betweenness . Their algorithm computes centrality values of all nodes in time O ( n 3 T 2 ), where n is the size of the network and T is the total number of time steps. For real-world networks, which easily contain tens of thousands of nodes, this complexity becomes prohibitive. Thus, it is reasonable to consider proxies for shortest temporal betweenness rankings that are more efficiently computed, and, therefore, allow for measuring the relative importance of nodes in very large temporal graphs. In this paper, we compare several such proxies on a diverse set of real-world networks. These proxies can be divided into global and local proxies. The considered global proxies include the exact algorithm for static betweenness (computed on the underlying graph), prefix foremost temporal betweenness of Buß et al., which is more efficiently computable than shortest temporal betweenness, and the recently introduced approximation approach of Santoro and Sarpe (WWW, 2022). As all of these global proxies are still expensive to compute on very large networks, we also turn to more efficiently computable local proxies. Here, we consider temporal versions of the ego-betweenness in the sense of Everett and Borgatti (Social Networks, 2005), standard degree notions, and a novel temporal degree notion termed the pass-through degree , that we introduce in this paper and which we consider to be one of our main contributions. We show that the pass-through degree, which measures the number of pairs of neighbors of a node that are temporally connected through it, can be computed in nearly linear time for all nodes in the network and we experimentally observe that it is surprisingly competitive as a proxy for shortest temporal betweenness.","PeriodicalId":9448,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Society of Sea Water Science, Japan","volume":"47 1","pages":"6:1-6:22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proxying Betweenness Centrality Rankings in Temporal Networks\",\"authors\":\"R. Becker, P. Crescenzi, A. Cruciani, Bojana Kodric\",\"doi\":\"10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2023.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Identifying influential nodes in a network is arguably one of the most important tasks in graph mining and network analysis. A large variety of centrality measures, all aiming at correctly quantifying a node’s importance in the network, have been formulated in the literature. One of the most cited ones is the betweenness centrality , formally introduced by Freeman (Sociometry, 1977). On the other hand, researchers have recently been very interested in capturing the dynamic nature of real-world networks by studying temporal graphs , rather than static ones. Clearly, centrality measures, including the betweenness centrality, have also been extended to temporal graphs. Buß et al. (KDD, 2020) gave algorithms to compute various notions of temporal betweenness centrality, including the perhaps most natural one – shortest temporal betweenness . Their algorithm computes centrality values of all nodes in time O ( n 3 T 2 ), where n is the size of the network and T is the total number of time steps. For real-world networks, which easily contain tens of thousands of nodes, this complexity becomes prohibitive. Thus, it is reasonable to consider proxies for shortest temporal betweenness rankings that are more efficiently computed, and, therefore, allow for measuring the relative importance of nodes in very large temporal graphs. In this paper, we compare several such proxies on a diverse set of real-world networks. These proxies can be divided into global and local proxies. The considered global proxies include the exact algorithm for static betweenness (computed on the underlying graph), prefix foremost temporal betweenness of Buß et al., which is more efficiently computable than shortest temporal betweenness, and the recently introduced approximation approach of Santoro and Sarpe (WWW, 2022). As all of these global proxies are still expensive to compute on very large networks, we also turn to more efficiently computable local proxies. Here, we consider temporal versions of the ego-betweenness in the sense of Everett and Borgatti (Social Networks, 2005), standard degree notions, and a novel temporal degree notion termed the pass-through degree , that we introduce in this paper and which we consider to be one of our main contributions. We show that the pass-through degree, which measures the number of pairs of neighbors of a node that are temporally connected through it, can be computed in nearly linear time for all nodes in the network and we experimentally observe that it is surprisingly competitive as a proxy for shortest temporal betweenness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Society of Sea Water Science, Japan\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"6:1-6:22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Society of Sea Water Science, Japan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2023.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Society of Sea Water Science, Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2023.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

识别网络中有影响的节点可以说是图挖掘和网络分析中最重要的任务之一。各种各样的中心性度量,都旨在正确量化节点在网络中的重要性,已经在文献中表述。其中被引用最多的是由Freeman (Sociometry, 1977)正式引入的中间性中心性。另一方面,研究人员最近对通过研究时间图而不是静态图来捕捉现实世界网络的动态特性非常感兴趣。显然,中心性度量,包括中间中心性,也已经扩展到时间图。Buß等人(KDD, 2020)给出了计算各种时间间隔中心性概念的算法,包括可能最自然的最短时间间隔。他们的算法计算所有节点在时间O (n 3t 2)内的中心性值,其中n为网络的大小,T为总时间步数。对于现实世界的网络,很容易包含成千上万个节点,这种复杂性变得令人望而却步。因此,考虑更有效地计算最短时间间隔排序的代理是合理的,因此,允许在非常大的时间图中测量节点的相对重要性。在本文中,我们在一组不同的现实世界网络上比较了几种这样的代理。这些代理可以分为全局代理和本地代理。考虑的全局代理包括静态间性的精确算法(在底层图上计算),Buß等人的前缀优先时间间性,它比最短时间间性更有效地计算,以及Santoro和Sarpe最近引入的近似方法(WWW, 2022)。由于在非常大的网络上计算所有这些全局代理仍然非常昂贵,因此我们还转向更有效的可计算本地代理。在这里,我们考虑了Everett和Borgatti (Social Networks, 2005)意义上的自我-中介的时间版本,标准程度概念,以及我们在本文中介绍的称为传递度的新时间程度概念,我们认为这是我们的主要贡献之一。我们表明,传递度(衡量节点临时连接的邻居对的数量)可以在网络中所有节点的近线性时间内计算出来,并且我们通过实验观察到,它作为最短时间间隔的代理具有惊人的竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proxying Betweenness Centrality Rankings in Temporal Networks
Identifying influential nodes in a network is arguably one of the most important tasks in graph mining and network analysis. A large variety of centrality measures, all aiming at correctly quantifying a node’s importance in the network, have been formulated in the literature. One of the most cited ones is the betweenness centrality , formally introduced by Freeman (Sociometry, 1977). On the other hand, researchers have recently been very interested in capturing the dynamic nature of real-world networks by studying temporal graphs , rather than static ones. Clearly, centrality measures, including the betweenness centrality, have also been extended to temporal graphs. Buß et al. (KDD, 2020) gave algorithms to compute various notions of temporal betweenness centrality, including the perhaps most natural one – shortest temporal betweenness . Their algorithm computes centrality values of all nodes in time O ( n 3 T 2 ), where n is the size of the network and T is the total number of time steps. For real-world networks, which easily contain tens of thousands of nodes, this complexity becomes prohibitive. Thus, it is reasonable to consider proxies for shortest temporal betweenness rankings that are more efficiently computed, and, therefore, allow for measuring the relative importance of nodes in very large temporal graphs. In this paper, we compare several such proxies on a diverse set of real-world networks. These proxies can be divided into global and local proxies. The considered global proxies include the exact algorithm for static betweenness (computed on the underlying graph), prefix foremost temporal betweenness of Buß et al., which is more efficiently computable than shortest temporal betweenness, and the recently introduced approximation approach of Santoro and Sarpe (WWW, 2022). As all of these global proxies are still expensive to compute on very large networks, we also turn to more efficiently computable local proxies. Here, we consider temporal versions of the ego-betweenness in the sense of Everett and Borgatti (Social Networks, 2005), standard degree notions, and a novel temporal degree notion termed the pass-through degree , that we introduce in this paper and which we consider to be one of our main contributions. We show that the pass-through degree, which measures the number of pairs of neighbors of a node that are temporally connected through it, can be computed in nearly linear time for all nodes in the network and we experimentally observe that it is surprisingly competitive as a proxy for shortest temporal betweenness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信