社区银行实体效率的提高

IF 2.9 4区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Stefan Jacewitz
{"title":"社区银行实体效率的提高","authors":"Stefan Jacewitz","doi":"10.18651/er/v107n2jacewitz","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last four decades, the number of community banks in the United States has steadily declined, from 15,000 in 1984 to less than 5,000 in 2021. Although community banks still account for more than 91 percent of all banks today, they hold a much smaller share of total industry assets: in particular, their asset share declined from 38 percent in 1984 to less than 12 percent in 2021. This decline has raised questions about the continued viability of the community bank business model. Community banks play an outsized role in originating loans to small businesses, so a continued decline in their numbers and asset holdings could constrain entrepreneurs’ access to credit—and, accordingly, constrain growth in the overall economy. Understanding the source of this decline is thus important for both regulators and policymakers. One possible explanation for the declining number of community banks is that larger banks have outpaced them in terms of efficiency. Community banks, which have less than $300 million in assets on average, may be less able to benefit from the economies of scale enjoyed by larger banks. In particular, community banks may be less able to afford or adapt to new technologies (such as mobile banking) that make banking more efficient. Moreover, a string of landmark regulatory changes— including the Riegle-Neal Act of 1994, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act","PeriodicalId":51713,"journal":{"name":"Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Increasing Brick-and-Mortar Efficiency of Community Banks\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Jacewitz\",\"doi\":\"10.18651/er/v107n2jacewitz\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the last four decades, the number of community banks in the United States has steadily declined, from 15,000 in 1984 to less than 5,000 in 2021. Although community banks still account for more than 91 percent of all banks today, they hold a much smaller share of total industry assets: in particular, their asset share declined from 38 percent in 1984 to less than 12 percent in 2021. This decline has raised questions about the continued viability of the community bank business model. Community banks play an outsized role in originating loans to small businesses, so a continued decline in their numbers and asset holdings could constrain entrepreneurs’ access to credit—and, accordingly, constrain growth in the overall economy. Understanding the source of this decline is thus important for both regulators and policymakers. One possible explanation for the declining number of community banks is that larger banks have outpaced them in terms of efficiency. Community banks, which have less than $300 million in assets on average, may be less able to benefit from the economies of scale enjoyed by larger banks. In particular, community banks may be less able to afford or adapt to new technologies (such as mobile banking) that make banking more efficient. Moreover, a string of landmark regulatory changes— including the Riegle-Neal Act of 1994, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act\",\"PeriodicalId\":51713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18651/er/v107n2jacewitz\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18651/er/v107n2jacewitz","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的40年里,美国社区银行的数量稳步下降,从1984年的1.5万家下降到2021年的不到5000家。尽管今天社区银行仍占所有银行的91%以上,但它们在行业总资产中所占的份额要小得多:特别是,它们的资产份额从1984年的38%下降到2021年的不到12%。这种下降引发了对社区银行业务模式持续可行性的质疑。社区银行在向小企业发放贷款方面发挥着巨大的作用,因此其数量和资产持有量的持续下降可能会限制企业家获得信贷的机会,从而限制整体经济的增长。因此,了解这种下降的根源对监管机构和政策制定者都很重要。社区银行数量下降的一个可能解释是,在效率方面,大型银行已经超过了它们。平均资产不足3亿美元的社区银行,可能无法从大型银行享有的规模经济中获益。特别是,社区银行可能负担不起或适应新技术(如移动银行)的能力较差,而新技术可以提高银行业务的效率。此外,一系列具有里程碑意义的监管改革——包括1994年的《里格尔-尼尔法案》、《格雷姆-里奇-比利利法案》
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Increasing Brick-and-Mortar Efficiency of Community Banks
Over the last four decades, the number of community banks in the United States has steadily declined, from 15,000 in 1984 to less than 5,000 in 2021. Although community banks still account for more than 91 percent of all banks today, they hold a much smaller share of total industry assets: in particular, their asset share declined from 38 percent in 1984 to less than 12 percent in 2021. This decline has raised questions about the continued viability of the community bank business model. Community banks play an outsized role in originating loans to small businesses, so a continued decline in their numbers and asset holdings could constrain entrepreneurs’ access to credit—and, accordingly, constrain growth in the overall economy. Understanding the source of this decline is thus important for both regulators and policymakers. One possible explanation for the declining number of community banks is that larger banks have outpaced them in terms of efficiency. Community banks, which have less than $300 million in assets on average, may be less able to benefit from the economies of scale enjoyed by larger banks. In particular, community banks may be less able to afford or adapt to new technologies (such as mobile banking) that make banking more efficient. Moreover, a string of landmark regulatory changes— including the Riegle-Neal Act of 1994, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信