{"title":"澳大利亚Cliff Head油田的地质和三维建模","authors":"Y. Eshmawi","doi":"10.2118/194954-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Cliff Head is one of the most significant discoveries in the offshore Northern Perth Basin. Hence, understanding the structure and geology of the field is essential to further evaluate the offshore region in the basin. Two structural models were developed with the objective to achieve a better understanding of this field. The first model is focused on the Permian and older strata, while the second model is for the overburden. In addition, reservoir properties models (e.g. porosity model and water saturation model) were developed to better understand the reservoir facies and hydrocarbon distribution. Examination of the structural models has shown that there are two main sets of faults within the Cliff Head area, which can be categorized into the following: the deep Permian faults that are truncated against the Late Permian unconformity, and younger Cretaceous faults that were developed during the Early Cretaceous rifting. It has also shown that the oil accumulation within the field is structurally trapped within Permian aged set of horsts and is mainly reservoired within the Irwin River Coal Measures. The secondary target (e.g. the underlying High Cliff Sandstone) is mostly beneath the regional oil-water contact of −1257.8 m TVDss, except in the highest structural point in the field, where Cliff Head-6 was drilled. The Irwin River Coal Measures in the study area contained four high resolution depositional sequences that displayed a finingupward pattern as depicted by the Gamma Ray log response and are interpreted to have mainly deposited in a fluvial depositional system. The High Cliff Sandstone, in contrast, contained two high resolution depositional sequences that displayed a coarsening upward sequences as supported by Gamma Ray log response and were interpreted to have mainly deposited in marginal marine settings. Reservoir properties modeling was also conducted utilizing the 3D models, where a 3D porosity model was calculated and shows that the Irwin River Coal Measures, in general, exhibit higher porosity distribution than the underlying High Cliff Sandstone, even though the later has coarser and more laterally extensive sand sheets. This is probably attributed to diagenetic porosity reduction within the High Cliff Sandstone caused by the formation waters. The calculated 3D water saturation model also confirms the presence of a single regional oil-water contact within the field and hence, reservoir heterogeneities and fault seal capacities did not affect the hydrocarbon distribution within the field. Finally, all the calculated models (e.g. lithofacies model, porosity model, and water saturation model) were integrated to estimate the recoverable hydrocarbons in place, where the Cliff Head is estimated to contain a total of 15.2 million barrels.","PeriodicalId":11321,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Geology and 3D Modelling of the Cliff Head Oil Field, Australia\",\"authors\":\"Y. Eshmawi\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/194954-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The Cliff Head is one of the most significant discoveries in the offshore Northern Perth Basin. Hence, understanding the structure and geology of the field is essential to further evaluate the offshore region in the basin. Two structural models were developed with the objective to achieve a better understanding of this field. The first model is focused on the Permian and older strata, while the second model is for the overburden. In addition, reservoir properties models (e.g. porosity model and water saturation model) were developed to better understand the reservoir facies and hydrocarbon distribution. Examination of the structural models has shown that there are two main sets of faults within the Cliff Head area, which can be categorized into the following: the deep Permian faults that are truncated against the Late Permian unconformity, and younger Cretaceous faults that were developed during the Early Cretaceous rifting. It has also shown that the oil accumulation within the field is structurally trapped within Permian aged set of horsts and is mainly reservoired within the Irwin River Coal Measures. The secondary target (e.g. the underlying High Cliff Sandstone) is mostly beneath the regional oil-water contact of −1257.8 m TVDss, except in the highest structural point in the field, where Cliff Head-6 was drilled. The Irwin River Coal Measures in the study area contained four high resolution depositional sequences that displayed a finingupward pattern as depicted by the Gamma Ray log response and are interpreted to have mainly deposited in a fluvial depositional system. The High Cliff Sandstone, in contrast, contained two high resolution depositional sequences that displayed a coarsening upward sequences as supported by Gamma Ray log response and were interpreted to have mainly deposited in marginal marine settings. Reservoir properties modeling was also conducted utilizing the 3D models, where a 3D porosity model was calculated and shows that the Irwin River Coal Measures, in general, exhibit higher porosity distribution than the underlying High Cliff Sandstone, even though the later has coarser and more laterally extensive sand sheets. This is probably attributed to diagenetic porosity reduction within the High Cliff Sandstone caused by the formation waters. The calculated 3D water saturation model also confirms the presence of a single regional oil-water contact within the field and hence, reservoir heterogeneities and fault seal capacities did not affect the hydrocarbon distribution within the field. Finally, all the calculated models (e.g. lithofacies model, porosity model, and water saturation model) were integrated to estimate the recoverable hydrocarbons in place, where the Cliff Head is estimated to contain a total of 15.2 million barrels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/194954-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194954-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Cliff Head是北海珀斯盆地最重要的发现之一。因此,了解油田的构造和地质对进一步评价盆地海上区域至关重要。为了更好地理解这一领域,我们开发了两个结构模型。第一种模式主要针对二叠系及更老的地层,第二种模式针对上覆层。此外,还建立了储层物性模型(如孔隙度模型和含水饱和度模型),以更好地了解储层相和油气分布。构造模型研究表明,断裂带主要有两组断裂,一组是针对晚二叠世不整合而截断的深二叠世断裂,另一组是早白垩世裂陷期发育的新白垩世断裂。研究还表明,油田内的油气在构造上被圈闭在二叠系古储层中,主要储集在欧文河煤系内。次级目标(如下伏的高崖砂岩)主要位于- 1257.8 m TVDss区域油水接触面以下,除了在油田最高构造点(Cliff Head-6)钻探。研究区欧文河煤系包含4个高分辨率的沉积层序,其伽马测井响应显示出向上细化的模式,主要为河流沉积体系。相比之下,高崖砂岩包含两个高分辨率的沉积层序,伽马测井响应支持其表现为粗化的向上层序,并解释为主要沉积于边缘海相环境。利用三维模型对储层进行了属性建模,计算了三维孔隙度模型,结果表明,Irwin River煤系总体上比下伏的High Cliff砂岩具有更高的孔隙度分布,尽管后者具有更粗、更横向扩展的砂层。这可能是由于地层水导致高崖砂岩内部成岩孔隙度降低所致。计算的三维含水饱和度模型也证实了油田内存在单一区域油水接触,因此,油藏非均质性和断层封闭能力不会影响油田内的油气分布。最后,综合所有计算模型(如岩相模型、孔隙度模型和含水饱和度模型),估计Cliff Head地区的可采油气储量为1520万桶。
The Geology and 3D Modelling of the Cliff Head Oil Field, Australia
The Cliff Head is one of the most significant discoveries in the offshore Northern Perth Basin. Hence, understanding the structure and geology of the field is essential to further evaluate the offshore region in the basin. Two structural models were developed with the objective to achieve a better understanding of this field. The first model is focused on the Permian and older strata, while the second model is for the overburden. In addition, reservoir properties models (e.g. porosity model and water saturation model) were developed to better understand the reservoir facies and hydrocarbon distribution. Examination of the structural models has shown that there are two main sets of faults within the Cliff Head area, which can be categorized into the following: the deep Permian faults that are truncated against the Late Permian unconformity, and younger Cretaceous faults that were developed during the Early Cretaceous rifting. It has also shown that the oil accumulation within the field is structurally trapped within Permian aged set of horsts and is mainly reservoired within the Irwin River Coal Measures. The secondary target (e.g. the underlying High Cliff Sandstone) is mostly beneath the regional oil-water contact of −1257.8 m TVDss, except in the highest structural point in the field, where Cliff Head-6 was drilled. The Irwin River Coal Measures in the study area contained four high resolution depositional sequences that displayed a finingupward pattern as depicted by the Gamma Ray log response and are interpreted to have mainly deposited in a fluvial depositional system. The High Cliff Sandstone, in contrast, contained two high resolution depositional sequences that displayed a coarsening upward sequences as supported by Gamma Ray log response and were interpreted to have mainly deposited in marginal marine settings. Reservoir properties modeling was also conducted utilizing the 3D models, where a 3D porosity model was calculated and shows that the Irwin River Coal Measures, in general, exhibit higher porosity distribution than the underlying High Cliff Sandstone, even though the later has coarser and more laterally extensive sand sheets. This is probably attributed to diagenetic porosity reduction within the High Cliff Sandstone caused by the formation waters. The calculated 3D water saturation model also confirms the presence of a single regional oil-water contact within the field and hence, reservoir heterogeneities and fault seal capacities did not affect the hydrocarbon distribution within the field. Finally, all the calculated models (e.g. lithofacies model, porosity model, and water saturation model) were integrated to estimate the recoverable hydrocarbons in place, where the Cliff Head is estimated to contain a total of 15.2 million barrels.