尼日利亚骨科和创伤外科医生骨盆和髋臼骨折管理的知识和实践

IF 0.2 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
J. Ogunlusi, M. Yusuf, S. Hailu, S. Popoola, O. Esan, K. Oluwadiya
{"title":"尼日利亚骨科和创伤外科医生骨盆和髋臼骨折管理的知识和实践","authors":"J. Ogunlusi, M. Yusuf, S. Hailu, S. Popoola, O. Esan, K. Oluwadiya","doi":"10.30491/TM.2021.295070.1330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pelvic-acetabular fractures are markers of high energy trauma and are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and management could be challenging. The inability to surgically manage these fractures appropriately in our centre and few publications on pelvic-acetabular fractures in Nigeria stimulated this study.Objectives: to find out how pelvic and acetabular fractures are managed and availability of investigating tools in Nigeria.Materials and methods: A questionnaire was uploaded for 7 weeks on the National orthopaedics and trauma surgeons’ forum. Questions on pelvic fractures management, knowledge and classification of pelvic fractures, preferred methods of pelvic fractures management- surgical or non-surgical, availability of advanced investigating tools and desire to acquire more skills /training were asked. Results: Eighty-five (33.2%) of the 256 members participated in the study. Preferred classification were Tile and Young-Burgess 46 (56.8%) and 29 (35.8 %) respectively. Thirty-six (43.9%) had Computerize Tomography scan (CT) while 19 (23.2%) had Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) available in their place of practice. Twenty-eight (34.6%) would manage operatively, 8 (9.9%) would either operate or refer, while 23 (28.48%) would either manage non-operative or refer and outright non-operative in 7 (8.6%) of pelvic-acetabular fractures that require Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF). Forty-six (56.8%) would refer patients; because of non-availability of skilled surgeon in 30(65.2%) and non-availability of operating tools in 32(69.6 %). Seventy-four (90.2%) would like to acquire skills in pelvic surgery.Conclusion: The health facilities were not adequately equipped with advanced imaging tools. Twenty-three percent of the respondents would consider managing pelvic fracture that requires ORIF non-operatively, while more than half would refer because of either non-availability of skilled pelvic surgeon or non-availably of operating tools. Majority of the respondents are interested in acquiring skills in pelvic surgery","PeriodicalId":23249,"journal":{"name":"Trauma monthly","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge and Practice of Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures Management Among Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgeons in Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"J. Ogunlusi, M. Yusuf, S. Hailu, S. Popoola, O. Esan, K. Oluwadiya\",\"doi\":\"10.30491/TM.2021.295070.1330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Pelvic-acetabular fractures are markers of high energy trauma and are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and management could be challenging. The inability to surgically manage these fractures appropriately in our centre and few publications on pelvic-acetabular fractures in Nigeria stimulated this study.Objectives: to find out how pelvic and acetabular fractures are managed and availability of investigating tools in Nigeria.Materials and methods: A questionnaire was uploaded for 7 weeks on the National orthopaedics and trauma surgeons’ forum. Questions on pelvic fractures management, knowledge and classification of pelvic fractures, preferred methods of pelvic fractures management- surgical or non-surgical, availability of advanced investigating tools and desire to acquire more skills /training were asked. Results: Eighty-five (33.2%) of the 256 members participated in the study. Preferred classification were Tile and Young-Burgess 46 (56.8%) and 29 (35.8 %) respectively. Thirty-six (43.9%) had Computerize Tomography scan (CT) while 19 (23.2%) had Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) available in their place of practice. Twenty-eight (34.6%) would manage operatively, 8 (9.9%) would either operate or refer, while 23 (28.48%) would either manage non-operative or refer and outright non-operative in 7 (8.6%) of pelvic-acetabular fractures that require Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF). Forty-six (56.8%) would refer patients; because of non-availability of skilled surgeon in 30(65.2%) and non-availability of operating tools in 32(69.6 %). Seventy-four (90.2%) would like to acquire skills in pelvic surgery.Conclusion: The health facilities were not adequately equipped with advanced imaging tools. Twenty-three percent of the respondents would consider managing pelvic fracture that requires ORIF non-operatively, while more than half would refer because of either non-availability of skilled pelvic surgeon or non-availably of operating tools. Majority of the respondents are interested in acquiring skills in pelvic surgery\",\"PeriodicalId\":23249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma monthly\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma monthly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30491/TM.2021.295070.1330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma monthly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30491/TM.2021.295070.1330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨盆-髋臼骨折是高能量创伤的标志,与显著的发病率、死亡率和治疗相关。在我们的中心,无法通过手术适当地处理这些骨折,而且尼日利亚关于骨盆-髋臼骨折的出版物很少,这促使了本研究的开展。目的:了解尼日利亚骨盆和髋臼骨折的治疗方法和调查工具的可用性。材料与方法:在全国骨科与创伤外科医生论坛上进行为期7周的问卷调查。关于骨盆骨折的治疗、骨盆骨折的知识和分类、骨盆骨折治疗的首选方法-手术或非手术、先进的调查工具的可用性以及获得更多技能/培训的愿望等问题被问及。结果:256名成员中有85人(33.2%)参与了研究。首选分类分别为Tile 46例(56.8%)和Young-Burgess 29例(35.8%)。36名(43.9%)接受了计算机断层扫描(CT), 19名(23.2%)接受了磁共振成像(MRI)。7例(8.6%)骨盆-髋臼骨折需要切开复位内固定(ORIF),其中28例(34.6%)选择手术治疗,8例(9.9%)选择手术或转诊,23例(28.48%)选择非手术治疗或转诊+完全非手术治疗。46名(56.8%)会转诊;因为缺乏熟练的外科医生30例(65.2%),缺乏手术工具32例(69.6%)。74人(90.2%)希望获得骨盆手术技能。结论:卫生机构未配备先进的影像设备。23%的受访者会考虑非手术治疗需要ORIF的骨盆骨折,而超过一半的人会因为无法获得熟练的骨盆外科医生或无法获得手术工具而转诊。大多数受访者对获得骨盆手术技能感兴趣
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge and Practice of Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures Management Among Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgeons in Nigeria
Background: Pelvic-acetabular fractures are markers of high energy trauma and are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and management could be challenging. The inability to surgically manage these fractures appropriately in our centre and few publications on pelvic-acetabular fractures in Nigeria stimulated this study.Objectives: to find out how pelvic and acetabular fractures are managed and availability of investigating tools in Nigeria.Materials and methods: A questionnaire was uploaded for 7 weeks on the National orthopaedics and trauma surgeons’ forum. Questions on pelvic fractures management, knowledge and classification of pelvic fractures, preferred methods of pelvic fractures management- surgical or non-surgical, availability of advanced investigating tools and desire to acquire more skills /training were asked. Results: Eighty-five (33.2%) of the 256 members participated in the study. Preferred classification were Tile and Young-Burgess 46 (56.8%) and 29 (35.8 %) respectively. Thirty-six (43.9%) had Computerize Tomography scan (CT) while 19 (23.2%) had Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) available in their place of practice. Twenty-eight (34.6%) would manage operatively, 8 (9.9%) would either operate or refer, while 23 (28.48%) would either manage non-operative or refer and outright non-operative in 7 (8.6%) of pelvic-acetabular fractures that require Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF). Forty-six (56.8%) would refer patients; because of non-availability of skilled surgeon in 30(65.2%) and non-availability of operating tools in 32(69.6 %). Seventy-four (90.2%) would like to acquire skills in pelvic surgery.Conclusion: The health facilities were not adequately equipped with advanced imaging tools. Twenty-three percent of the respondents would consider managing pelvic fracture that requires ORIF non-operatively, while more than half would refer because of either non-availability of skilled pelvic surgeon or non-availably of operating tools. Majority of the respondents are interested in acquiring skills in pelvic surgery
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trauma monthly
Trauma monthly EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信