修复参数相对-à-vis材料组合的存活时间

S. Sampath
{"title":"修复参数相对-à-vis材料组合的存活时间","authors":"S. Sampath","doi":"10.4103/2321-4619.150026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Two types of composite restorative modalities are compared: All-universal composite restoration (single) versus restorations done using flowable-universal composite combination (dual). Aims: To assess survival probabilities of three restorative parameters: Intactness,color match and marginal integrity. Whether the survival probabilities are influenced by restoration modality and cavity types, and if so, to what extent Clinically relevant deductions with respect to materials and clinical technique. Settings and Design: A retrospective, case-control analytical study based on secondary data derived from documentation of evaluations of restorations placed in patients attending a primary dental care. Subjects and Methods: Data from the records of as many restorations that were routinely evaluated in the clinic, at different points in time for up to 5 years, were drawn up (2008 − 2013). The dual modality restorations were considered as ′cases′ and the single modality restorations were deemed ′controls′. Statistical Analysis Used: The life-table method was applied for the survival analysis of each of the three clinical parameters. Qualitative analysis of these same parameters was also carried out using the Chi-square test with P < 0.05. Results: Survival probabilities of restoration retention (intactness) and color match were not influenced by the restorative modality, though marginal integrity′s survival probability was; being slightly lower for flowable-universal combination. The subset of posterior load-bearing cavities performed similarly on all clinical parameters (survival as well as qualitatively), uninfluenced by the restorative modality. Conclusions: Overall, the lower survival of marginal integrity may necessitate sooner replacements for restorations done using flowable-universal combinations. However, in the specific case of classes I, II and built-ups i.e. posterior load bearing cavities, these might as well be restored with a combination of flowable-universal material.","PeriodicalId":17076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","volume":"12 1","pages":"14 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival times of restorative parameters vis-à-vis material combinations\",\"authors\":\"S. Sampath\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2321-4619.150026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Two types of composite restorative modalities are compared: All-universal composite restoration (single) versus restorations done using flowable-universal composite combination (dual). Aims: To assess survival probabilities of three restorative parameters: Intactness,color match and marginal integrity. Whether the survival probabilities are influenced by restoration modality and cavity types, and if so, to what extent Clinically relevant deductions with respect to materials and clinical technique. Settings and Design: A retrospective, case-control analytical study based on secondary data derived from documentation of evaluations of restorations placed in patients attending a primary dental care. Subjects and Methods: Data from the records of as many restorations that were routinely evaluated in the clinic, at different points in time for up to 5 years, were drawn up (2008 − 2013). The dual modality restorations were considered as ′cases′ and the single modality restorations were deemed ′controls′. Statistical Analysis Used: The life-table method was applied for the survival analysis of each of the three clinical parameters. Qualitative analysis of these same parameters was also carried out using the Chi-square test with P < 0.05. Results: Survival probabilities of restoration retention (intactness) and color match were not influenced by the restorative modality, though marginal integrity′s survival probability was; being slightly lower for flowable-universal combination. The subset of posterior load-bearing cavities performed similarly on all clinical parameters (survival as well as qualitatively), uninfluenced by the restorative modality. Conclusions: Overall, the lower survival of marginal integrity may necessitate sooner replacements for restorations done using flowable-universal combinations. However, in the specific case of classes I, II and built-ups i.e. posterior load bearing cavities, these might as well be restored with a combination of flowable-universal material.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"14 - 20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-4619.150026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-4619.150026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:比较了两种类型的复合修复方式:全通用复合修复(单一)与流动通用复合修复(双重)。目的:评估三个修复参数的生存概率:完整性,颜色匹配和边缘完整性。生存概率是否受到修复方式和腔型的影响,如果是,在多大程度上与材料和临床技术相关的临床相关推论。背景和设计:一项基于二手数据的回顾性病例对照分析研究,这些二手数据来源于参加初级牙科保健的患者对修复体的评估文件。研究对象和方法:从临床常规评估的尽可能多的修复体记录中收集数据,在长达5年的不同时间点进行评估(2008 - 2013)。双模态恢复被认为是“病例”,单模态恢复被认为是“对照”。统计学分析应用:采用生命表法对3个临床参数进行生存分析。同样对这些参数进行定性分析,采用卡方检验,P < 0.05。结果:修复体保留(完整性)和颜色匹配的存活率不受修复方式的影响,但边缘完整性的存活率受影响;对于流动-通用组合略低。后牙承重腔子集在所有临床参数(生存和质量)上表现相似,不受修复方式的影响。结论:总的来说,边缘完整性较低的存活率可能需要更快地使用流动-通用组合进行修复。然而,在I类,II类和后部承重腔的特殊情况下,这些也可以用流动通用材料的组合来修复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survival times of restorative parameters vis-à-vis material combinations
Context: Two types of composite restorative modalities are compared: All-universal composite restoration (single) versus restorations done using flowable-universal composite combination (dual). Aims: To assess survival probabilities of three restorative parameters: Intactness,color match and marginal integrity. Whether the survival probabilities are influenced by restoration modality and cavity types, and if so, to what extent Clinically relevant deductions with respect to materials and clinical technique. Settings and Design: A retrospective, case-control analytical study based on secondary data derived from documentation of evaluations of restorations placed in patients attending a primary dental care. Subjects and Methods: Data from the records of as many restorations that were routinely evaluated in the clinic, at different points in time for up to 5 years, were drawn up (2008 − 2013). The dual modality restorations were considered as ′cases′ and the single modality restorations were deemed ′controls′. Statistical Analysis Used: The life-table method was applied for the survival analysis of each of the three clinical parameters. Qualitative analysis of these same parameters was also carried out using the Chi-square test with P < 0.05. Results: Survival probabilities of restoration retention (intactness) and color match were not influenced by the restorative modality, though marginal integrity′s survival probability was; being slightly lower for flowable-universal combination. The subset of posterior load-bearing cavities performed similarly on all clinical parameters (survival as well as qualitatively), uninfluenced by the restorative modality. Conclusions: Overall, the lower survival of marginal integrity may necessitate sooner replacements for restorations done using flowable-universal combinations. However, in the specific case of classes I, II and built-ups i.e. posterior load bearing cavities, these might as well be restored with a combination of flowable-universal material.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信