澳大利亚软层建筑的倒塌概率及其对基于风险的抗震设计的影响

IF 0.9 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
H. Tsang, John L. Wilson, E. Gad
{"title":"澳大利亚软层建筑的倒塌概率及其对基于风险的抗震设计的影响","authors":"H. Tsang, John L. Wilson, E. Gad","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2020.1835157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Collapse prevention is the primary objective of earthquake-resistant design of structures; hence, the probability of collapse should be taken as a crucial performance indicator for risk-based design of new structures or assessment of existing structures. One major challenge in collapse risk assessment is to reliably model the non-linear structural response behaviour. This study features the rocking response behaviour of precast reinforced concrete (RC) columns based on results from previous field testing on parts of a real building and supplemented with a study of their rocking behaviours through a series of shake-table tests. The effects of bidirectional earthquake actions on failure drift capacity of columns have also been incorporated, such that realistic estimates of displacement capacity were made for constructing collapse fragility functions, which were then combined with the ground motion recurrence relationships of Melbourne, Australia for the computation of collapse probability. A suite of typical soft-storey buildings was adopted, with considerations given to a diversity of site conditions. Deaggregation of the results reveals the range of return periods that controls the collapse risk, which could have important implications for the choice of earthquake scenarios for seismic analysis and design in regions of lower seismicity.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":"95 1","pages":"307 - 319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collapse probability of soft-storey building in Australia and implications for risk-based seismic design\",\"authors\":\"H. Tsang, John L. Wilson, E. Gad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13287982.2020.1835157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Collapse prevention is the primary objective of earthquake-resistant design of structures; hence, the probability of collapse should be taken as a crucial performance indicator for risk-based design of new structures or assessment of existing structures. One major challenge in collapse risk assessment is to reliably model the non-linear structural response behaviour. This study features the rocking response behaviour of precast reinforced concrete (RC) columns based on results from previous field testing on parts of a real building and supplemented with a study of their rocking behaviours through a series of shake-table tests. The effects of bidirectional earthquake actions on failure drift capacity of columns have also been incorporated, such that realistic estimates of displacement capacity were made for constructing collapse fragility functions, which were then combined with the ground motion recurrence relationships of Melbourne, Australia for the computation of collapse probability. A suite of typical soft-storey buildings was adopted, with considerations given to a diversity of site conditions. Deaggregation of the results reveals the range of return periods that controls the collapse risk, which could have important implications for the choice of earthquake scenarios for seismic analysis and design in regions of lower seismicity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"307 - 319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2020.1835157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2020.1835157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要防倒塌是结构抗震设计的首要目标;因此,应将倒塌概率作为新结构风险设计或既有结构风险评估的重要性能指标。倒塌风险评估的一个主要挑战是可靠地模拟非线性结构响应行为。本研究的特点是预制钢筋混凝土(RC)柱的摇摆响应行为基于先前对真实建筑物部分的现场试验结果,并辅以一系列振动台试验对其摇摆行为的研究。本文还考虑了双向地震作用对柱的破坏漂移能力的影响,从而对柱的位移能力进行了实际估计,从而构建了柱的倒塌易损性函数,并将其与澳大利亚墨尔本的地震动递推关系相结合,计算了柱的倒塌概率。考虑到场地条件的多样性,采用了一套典型的软层建筑。结果的分解揭示了控制倒塌风险的回归期范围,这可能对地震活动性较低地区地震分析和设计的地震情景选择具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collapse probability of soft-storey building in Australia and implications for risk-based seismic design
ABSTRACT Collapse prevention is the primary objective of earthquake-resistant design of structures; hence, the probability of collapse should be taken as a crucial performance indicator for risk-based design of new structures or assessment of existing structures. One major challenge in collapse risk assessment is to reliably model the non-linear structural response behaviour. This study features the rocking response behaviour of precast reinforced concrete (RC) columns based on results from previous field testing on parts of a real building and supplemented with a study of their rocking behaviours through a series of shake-table tests. The effects of bidirectional earthquake actions on failure drift capacity of columns have also been incorporated, such that realistic estimates of displacement capacity were made for constructing collapse fragility functions, which were then combined with the ground motion recurrence relationships of Melbourne, Australia for the computation of collapse probability. A suite of typical soft-storey buildings was adopted, with considerations given to a diversity of site conditions. Deaggregation of the results reveals the range of return periods that controls the collapse risk, which could have important implications for the choice of earthquake scenarios for seismic analysis and design in regions of lower seismicity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信