从“令人难以置信的愚蠢”到“保持健康的秘密线索”:2020年4月爱沙尼亚和芬兰主流媒体的CAM景观和边界工作

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 FOLKLORE
R. Hiiemäe, Terhi Utriainen
{"title":"从“令人难以置信的愚蠢”到“保持健康的秘密线索”:2020年4月爱沙尼亚和芬兰主流媒体的CAM景观和边界工作","authors":"R. Hiiemäe, Terhi Utriainen","doi":"10.7592/FEJF2021.82.HIIEMAE_UTRIAINEN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a one-month (April 2020) comparative observation of media content in three Estonian and three Finnish mainstream media sources (two daily newspapers and one weekly women’s magazine) along with some examples from an earlier period, the authors analysed the representation of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in the media. The analysis showed that the media from the two countries presented CAM both in its various mainstream and more fringe forms, and that pejorative as well as complimentary and attracting undertones were present. The authors conclude that CAM topics were present in the selection of sources as methods for wellbeing and healing but also as entertaining, exoticising, warning, and mystical-metaphorical allusions along with different levels of boundary-work, especially science. The authors also noted interesting differences between the chosen media both within one country and between the two countries in terms of how much CAM was present as well as in which ways it was treated. In the Estonian material, the scale of tones was broader: the texts presented highly sensational, exoticising and othering angles towards approaches that were considered extreme and dangerous but mainly entertainment-oriented, and they positively described healing and wellbeing practices, sometimes with a mystic touch. The Finnish media was more low-key in its representations and tone: the mentions were shorter and less frequent. Although the Finnish material had more positive representations, this does not suggest that CAM is more tolerated in Finland – the Finnish media presented less extreme forms of CAM, which gave less ground for journalistic opposition.","PeriodicalId":42641,"journal":{"name":"Folklore-Electronic Journal of Folklore","volume":"152 1","pages":"183-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From “Unbelievable Stupidity” to “Secret Clues for Staying Healthy”: CAM Landscape and Boundary-Work in Estonian and Finnish Mainstream Media in April 2020\",\"authors\":\"R. Hiiemäe, Terhi Utriainen\",\"doi\":\"10.7592/FEJF2021.82.HIIEMAE_UTRIAINEN\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on a one-month (April 2020) comparative observation of media content in three Estonian and three Finnish mainstream media sources (two daily newspapers and one weekly women’s magazine) along with some examples from an earlier period, the authors analysed the representation of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in the media. The analysis showed that the media from the two countries presented CAM both in its various mainstream and more fringe forms, and that pejorative as well as complimentary and attracting undertones were present. The authors conclude that CAM topics were present in the selection of sources as methods for wellbeing and healing but also as entertaining, exoticising, warning, and mystical-metaphorical allusions along with different levels of boundary-work, especially science. The authors also noted interesting differences between the chosen media both within one country and between the two countries in terms of how much CAM was present as well as in which ways it was treated. In the Estonian material, the scale of tones was broader: the texts presented highly sensational, exoticising and othering angles towards approaches that were considered extreme and dangerous but mainly entertainment-oriented, and they positively described healing and wellbeing practices, sometimes with a mystic touch. The Finnish media was more low-key in its representations and tone: the mentions were shorter and less frequent. Although the Finnish material had more positive representations, this does not suggest that CAM is more tolerated in Finland – the Finnish media presented less extreme forms of CAM, which gave less ground for journalistic opposition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Folklore-Electronic Journal of Folklore\",\"volume\":\"152 1\",\"pages\":\"183-214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Folklore-Electronic Journal of Folklore\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7592/FEJF2021.82.HIIEMAE_UTRIAINEN\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FOLKLORE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folklore-Electronic Journal of Folklore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7592/FEJF2021.82.HIIEMAE_UTRIAINEN","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FOLKLORE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

基于一个月(2020年4月)对三个爱沙尼亚和三个芬兰主流媒体来源(两个日报和一个周刊女性杂志)的媒体内容的比较观察,以及早期的一些例子,作者分析了补充和替代医学(CAM)在媒体中的代表性。分析表明,两国媒体对CAM的报道既有各种主流形式,也有较为偏激的形式,既有贬义,也有褒扬和吸引人的含蓄。作者得出结论,CAM主题存在于作为健康和治疗方法的来源选择中,但也存在于娱乐,异国情调,警告和神秘隐喻的典喻中,以及不同层次的边界工作,特别是科学。作者还注意到,在一个国家和两个国家所选择的媒体之间,在CAM出现的程度以及对待CAM的方式方面存在有趣的差异。在爱沙尼亚材料中,音调的范围更广:文本呈现高度耸人听闻,异国情调和其他角度,对被认为极端和危险但主要以娱乐为导向的方法,它们积极描述治疗和健康实践,有时带有神秘色彩。芬兰媒体在表述和语气上更为低调:提及的时间更短,频率也更低。虽然芬兰的材料有更积极的表现,但这并不意味着芬兰更能容忍CAM -芬兰媒体呈现的CAM不那么极端,这给新闻反对派提供了更少的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From “Unbelievable Stupidity” to “Secret Clues for Staying Healthy”: CAM Landscape and Boundary-Work in Estonian and Finnish Mainstream Media in April 2020
Based on a one-month (April 2020) comparative observation of media content in three Estonian and three Finnish mainstream media sources (two daily newspapers and one weekly women’s magazine) along with some examples from an earlier period, the authors analysed the representation of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in the media. The analysis showed that the media from the two countries presented CAM both in its various mainstream and more fringe forms, and that pejorative as well as complimentary and attracting undertones were present. The authors conclude that CAM topics were present in the selection of sources as methods for wellbeing and healing but also as entertaining, exoticising, warning, and mystical-metaphorical allusions along with different levels of boundary-work, especially science. The authors also noted interesting differences between the chosen media both within one country and between the two countries in terms of how much CAM was present as well as in which ways it was treated. In the Estonian material, the scale of tones was broader: the texts presented highly sensational, exoticising and othering angles towards approaches that were considered extreme and dangerous but mainly entertainment-oriented, and they positively described healing and wellbeing practices, sometimes with a mystic touch. The Finnish media was more low-key in its representations and tone: the mentions were shorter and less frequent. Although the Finnish material had more positive representations, this does not suggest that CAM is more tolerated in Finland – the Finnish media presented less extreme forms of CAM, which gave less ground for journalistic opposition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信