2013年肯德尔中学X班基于学习成果课程的工具质量评估

Ayu Nurjanah, E. Rudyatmi, S. M. Susilowati
{"title":"2013年肯德尔中学X班基于学习成果课程的工具质量评估","authors":"Ayu Nurjanah, E. Rudyatmi, S. M. Susilowati","doi":"10.15294/JBE.V8I1.26243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One important component of the curriculum in 2013 is a competency-based assessment. This assessment is not only seen from the final result, but also how the processes that occur during learning. Assessment is done using instruments varies. Instruments' knowledge, attitudes, and skills that exist have not analyzed the quality but it is used by teachers in conducting the evaluation. The purpose of this study was to analyze the quality of assessment instruments UKK, attitude observation sheets, and assessment sheets used in practice test Class X SMAN biology teacher in Kendal. The quantitative data in the form of the level of difficulty, distinguishing, distractor effectiveness, and reliability matter UKK. Qualitative data in the form of conformity UKK, observation sheets attitude, and practice tests assessment sheet in terms of material, construction, and language. The results showed that the quality of qualitative UKK is 45% good and 55% about the problem should be corrected. Qualitatively UKK quality is good and 75% about 25% is not good. Observation sheet quality is pretty good 83% and 17% unfavorable. Sheet quality assessment practice test is 83% good and 17% poor.     ","PeriodicalId":53330,"journal":{"name":"Unnes Journal of Biology Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Instrument Assessment of Learning Outcomes Based Curriculum 2013 Class X SMAN in Kendal\",\"authors\":\"Ayu Nurjanah, E. Rudyatmi, S. M. Susilowati\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/JBE.V8I1.26243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One important component of the curriculum in 2013 is a competency-based assessment. This assessment is not only seen from the final result, but also how the processes that occur during learning. Assessment is done using instruments varies. Instruments' knowledge, attitudes, and skills that exist have not analyzed the quality but it is used by teachers in conducting the evaluation. The purpose of this study was to analyze the quality of assessment instruments UKK, attitude observation sheets, and assessment sheets used in practice test Class X SMAN biology teacher in Kendal. The quantitative data in the form of the level of difficulty, distinguishing, distractor effectiveness, and reliability matter UKK. Qualitative data in the form of conformity UKK, observation sheets attitude, and practice tests assessment sheet in terms of material, construction, and language. The results showed that the quality of qualitative UKK is 45% good and 55% about the problem should be corrected. Qualitatively UKK quality is good and 75% about 25% is not good. Observation sheet quality is pretty good 83% and 17% unfavorable. Sheet quality assessment practice test is 83% good and 17% poor.     \",\"PeriodicalId\":53330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unnes Journal of Biology Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unnes Journal of Biology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/JBE.V8I1.26243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unnes Journal of Biology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/JBE.V8I1.26243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2013年课程的一个重要组成部分是基于能力的评估。这种评价不仅从最终的结果来看,而且从学习过程中发生的过程来看。评估使用的工具各不相同。现有的仪器知识、态度和技能并没有分析质量,但它被教师用来进行评估。本研究的目的是分析肯德尔县X班生物教师在实践测试中使用的UKK评估工具、态度观察表和评估表的质量。定量数据形式的难度,区分,分心的有效性和可靠性的问题UKK。在材料、结构和语言方面,以符合性UKK、观察表态度和实践测试评估表形式提供定性数据。结果表明,定性UKK的质量合格率为45%,有待改进率为55%。从质量上来说,英国的质量是好的,75%的质量不好,25%的质量不好。观察单质量很好,83%不理想,17%不理想。试卷质量评估实践测试的优良率为83%,差良率为17%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of Instrument Assessment of Learning Outcomes Based Curriculum 2013 Class X SMAN in Kendal
One important component of the curriculum in 2013 is a competency-based assessment. This assessment is not only seen from the final result, but also how the processes that occur during learning. Assessment is done using instruments varies. Instruments' knowledge, attitudes, and skills that exist have not analyzed the quality but it is used by teachers in conducting the evaluation. The purpose of this study was to analyze the quality of assessment instruments UKK, attitude observation sheets, and assessment sheets used in practice test Class X SMAN biology teacher in Kendal. The quantitative data in the form of the level of difficulty, distinguishing, distractor effectiveness, and reliability matter UKK. Qualitative data in the form of conformity UKK, observation sheets attitude, and practice tests assessment sheet in terms of material, construction, and language. The results showed that the quality of qualitative UKK is 45% good and 55% about the problem should be corrected. Qualitatively UKK quality is good and 75% about 25% is not good. Observation sheet quality is pretty good 83% and 17% unfavorable. Sheet quality assessment practice test is 83% good and 17% poor.     
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信