药理学CBME课程的教学经验-横断面问卷研究

Rajesh Dasaraju, Pati Bapugouda, Advaitha V, A. Mark
{"title":"药理学CBME课程的教学经验-横断面问卷研究","authors":"Rajesh Dasaraju, Pati Bapugouda, Advaitha V, A. Mark","doi":"10.5455/njppp.2023.13.11546202213022023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Many studies were conducted in India among the teaching faculties to understand the challenges before the implementation of new competency-based medical education (CBME) curriculum. Studies assessing the experiences and the challenges faced after its implementation are limited. Aim and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the experiences and the challenges faced by the teaching faculties in different medical colleges across India while implementing the new CBME curriculum in pharmacology for the MBBS batch 2019–20 students. Materials and Methods: A 19 item pre-validated questionnaire was shared to faculties through Google Forms with most of the questions having three options for answers, namely, “Agree,” “Disagree,” and “Not sure.” The time-period provided for answering the questions was 2 weeks. The data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel sheet using descriptive statistics. Results: Majority of the faculties 56 (61.5%) do not agree with national medical commission in terms of number of teaching faculty and infrastructure to implement the CBME curriculum in pharmacology. About 56 (61.5%) of the faculties felt that the number of teaching hours recommended in the CBME curriculum for pharmacology are inadequate to cover all the competencies. Seventy-eight (85.7%) felt that the implementation of CBME curriculum for the 2019–20 batch MBBS students was impacted by COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: Although faculty development programs played a crucial role in sensitizing faculties to implement CBME curriculum, subject specific problems do persist and the faculties need to motivate themselves to suggest ways to resolve them.","PeriodicalId":18969,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching faculty experiences on CBME curriculum in pharmacology – A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study\",\"authors\":\"Rajesh Dasaraju, Pati Bapugouda, Advaitha V, A. Mark\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/njppp.2023.13.11546202213022023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Many studies were conducted in India among the teaching faculties to understand the challenges before the implementation of new competency-based medical education (CBME) curriculum. Studies assessing the experiences and the challenges faced after its implementation are limited. Aim and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the experiences and the challenges faced by the teaching faculties in different medical colleges across India while implementing the new CBME curriculum in pharmacology for the MBBS batch 2019–20 students. Materials and Methods: A 19 item pre-validated questionnaire was shared to faculties through Google Forms with most of the questions having three options for answers, namely, “Agree,” “Disagree,” and “Not sure.” The time-period provided for answering the questions was 2 weeks. The data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel sheet using descriptive statistics. Results: Majority of the faculties 56 (61.5%) do not agree with national medical commission in terms of number of teaching faculty and infrastructure to implement the CBME curriculum in pharmacology. About 56 (61.5%) of the faculties felt that the number of teaching hours recommended in the CBME curriculum for pharmacology are inadequate to cover all the competencies. Seventy-eight (85.7%) felt that the implementation of CBME curriculum for the 2019–20 batch MBBS students was impacted by COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: Although faculty development programs played a crucial role in sensitizing faculties to implement CBME curriculum, subject specific problems do persist and the faculties need to motivate themselves to suggest ways to resolve them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2023.13.11546202213022023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2023.13.11546202213022023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在印度的教学学院中进行了许多研究,以了解在实施新的以能力为基础的医学教育(CBME)课程之前所面临的挑战。评估实施后的经验和面临的挑战的研究是有限的。目的和目标:本研究的目的是评估印度不同医学院的教师在为MBBS 2019-20批学生实施新的CBME药理学课程时所面临的经验和挑战。材料和方法:一份19项预先验证的问卷通过谷歌表格分享给教员,大多数问题有三个答案选项,即“同意”、“不同意”和“不确定”。回答问题的时间期限为2周。使用Microsoft Excel表格对数据进行描述性统计分析。结果:56所院校(61.5%)在教学师资数量和基础设施建设等方面与国家医委意见不一致。约56位(61.5%)教师认为CBME药理学课程推荐的教学时数不足以涵盖所有能力。78名(85.7%)教师认为2019-20期MBBS学生CBME课程的实施受到新冠肺炎疫情的影响。结论:尽管教师发展计划在激励教师实施CBME课程方面发挥了至关重要的作用,但学科特定问题仍然存在,教师需要激励自己提出解决这些问题的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teaching faculty experiences on CBME curriculum in pharmacology – A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study
Background: Many studies were conducted in India among the teaching faculties to understand the challenges before the implementation of new competency-based medical education (CBME) curriculum. Studies assessing the experiences and the challenges faced after its implementation are limited. Aim and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the experiences and the challenges faced by the teaching faculties in different medical colleges across India while implementing the new CBME curriculum in pharmacology for the MBBS batch 2019–20 students. Materials and Methods: A 19 item pre-validated questionnaire was shared to faculties through Google Forms with most of the questions having three options for answers, namely, “Agree,” “Disagree,” and “Not sure.” The time-period provided for answering the questions was 2 weeks. The data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel sheet using descriptive statistics. Results: Majority of the faculties 56 (61.5%) do not agree with national medical commission in terms of number of teaching faculty and infrastructure to implement the CBME curriculum in pharmacology. About 56 (61.5%) of the faculties felt that the number of teaching hours recommended in the CBME curriculum for pharmacology are inadequate to cover all the competencies. Seventy-eight (85.7%) felt that the implementation of CBME curriculum for the 2019–20 batch MBBS students was impacted by COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: Although faculty development programs played a crucial role in sensitizing faculties to implement CBME curriculum, subject specific problems do persist and the faculties need to motivate themselves to suggest ways to resolve them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信