{"title":"四面山国家公园世界遗产地生态旅游的社区知识与支持","authors":"Abuhay Tewodros, Teshome Endalkachew, M. Gashaw","doi":"10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.4.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: An in-depth investigation into locals' familiarity with and support for ecotourism development is necessary to ensure the long-term viability of responsible and sustainable tourism. This study aimed to assess the protected area communities' knowledge and level of support for eco-tourism and its development in the Semien Mountain National Park, North Gondar, Ethiopia. Design/methodology/approach: The study employed a mixed research approach and an explanatory design. A multi- stage sampling was used to select 397 samples of respondents from three districts. As methods for gathering data, surveys, interviews and focus group discussions were all employed. Percentages, averages, t-tests, analysis of variance, regression models and thematic analysis were used to analyze the data. Findings: More than half of the respondents (57.2%) were unable to know what tourist is, even though the study found that 93.5% of respondents had a fair understanding of what tourism involved. Nearly three-quarters of the respondents said that their main sources of tourism-related information were their friends and the government. In the multiple regression model, all independent variables together account for about 38.7% of the total variance in the dependent variable. Only three factors significantly contributed to the prediction of the variation in ecotourism support: ecotourism benefit (β = 24, p = 0.001, gender (β =0.47, p = 0.000), and family size (β=0.12, p =.005. Research limitations/implications: Variables, time, and space were limitations on this study. All elements influencing local communities' support for ecotourism development were not exhaustively considered. This research may not apply to other places with differing social, cultural, and environmental settings. This study is also cross-sectional, which means it does not provide information on how local understanding and support for ecotourism may evolve over time. Originality/value: Many studies have examined the consequences of tourism on host communities and tourist attitudes toward ecotourism, but few have examined local understanding and support of ecotourism development. As a result, this study can provide novel perspectives and knowledge that can enhance comprehension of this phenomenon, influence policymaking and practical applications, and ultimately foster the progression of the field.","PeriodicalId":35226,"journal":{"name":"Global Business and Finance Review","volume":"167 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community Knowledge and Support of Ecotourism in the World Heritages Sites of Simien Mountain National Park\",\"authors\":\"Abuhay Tewodros, Teshome Endalkachew, M. Gashaw\",\"doi\":\"10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.4.62\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: An in-depth investigation into locals' familiarity with and support for ecotourism development is necessary to ensure the long-term viability of responsible and sustainable tourism. This study aimed to assess the protected area communities' knowledge and level of support for eco-tourism and its development in the Semien Mountain National Park, North Gondar, Ethiopia. Design/methodology/approach: The study employed a mixed research approach and an explanatory design. A multi- stage sampling was used to select 397 samples of respondents from three districts. As methods for gathering data, surveys, interviews and focus group discussions were all employed. Percentages, averages, t-tests, analysis of variance, regression models and thematic analysis were used to analyze the data. Findings: More than half of the respondents (57.2%) were unable to know what tourist is, even though the study found that 93.5% of respondents had a fair understanding of what tourism involved. Nearly three-quarters of the respondents said that their main sources of tourism-related information were their friends and the government. In the multiple regression model, all independent variables together account for about 38.7% of the total variance in the dependent variable. Only three factors significantly contributed to the prediction of the variation in ecotourism support: ecotourism benefit (β = 24, p = 0.001, gender (β =0.47, p = 0.000), and family size (β=0.12, p =.005. Research limitations/implications: Variables, time, and space were limitations on this study. All elements influencing local communities' support for ecotourism development were not exhaustively considered. This research may not apply to other places with differing social, cultural, and environmental settings. This study is also cross-sectional, which means it does not provide information on how local understanding and support for ecotourism may evolve over time. Originality/value: Many studies have examined the consequences of tourism on host communities and tourist attitudes toward ecotourism, but few have examined local understanding and support of ecotourism development. As a result, this study can provide novel perspectives and knowledge that can enhance comprehension of this phenomenon, influence policymaking and practical applications, and ultimately foster the progression of the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Business and Finance Review\",\"volume\":\"167 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Business and Finance Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.4.62\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Business and Finance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.4.62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:深入调查当地人对生态旅游发展的熟悉程度和支持程度,以确保负责任和可持续旅游的长期可行性。本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚北部贡达尔塞门山国家公园保护区社区对生态旅游及其发展的知识和支持水平。设计/方法/方法:本研究采用混合研究方法和解释设计。采用多阶段抽样的方法,从三个地区抽取397名受访者。收集数据的方法包括调查、访谈和焦点小组讨论。采用百分比、平均、t检验、方差分析、回归模型和专题分析等方法对数据进行分析。调查结果:超过一半的受访者(57.2%)不知道什么是旅游,尽管研究发现93.5%的受访者对旅游所涉及的内容有一个公平的理解。近四分之三的受访者表示,他们获取旅游相关信息的主要来源是朋友和政府。在多元回归模型中,所有自变量加起来约占因变量总方差的38.7%。只有3个因素对生态旅游支持度变化的预测有显著贡献:生态旅游效益(β= 24, p = 0.001)、性别(β= 0.47, p = 0.000)和家庭规模(β=0.12, p = 0.005)。研究局限性/启示:变量、时间和空间是本研究的局限性。影响当地社区支持生态旅游发展的所有因素都没有得到充分考虑。这项研究可能不适用于其他具有不同社会、文化和环境背景的地方。这项研究也是横断面的,这意味着它没有提供关于当地对生态旅游的理解和支持如何随着时间的推移而演变的信息。原创性/价值:许多研究调查了旅游对东道国社区的影响和游客对生态旅游的态度,但很少有研究调查当地对生态旅游发展的理解和支持。因此,本研究可以提供新的视角和知识,以加强对这一现象的理解,影响政策制定和实际应用,并最终促进该领域的发展。
Community Knowledge and Support of Ecotourism in the World Heritages Sites of Simien Mountain National Park
Purpose: An in-depth investigation into locals' familiarity with and support for ecotourism development is necessary to ensure the long-term viability of responsible and sustainable tourism. This study aimed to assess the protected area communities' knowledge and level of support for eco-tourism and its development in the Semien Mountain National Park, North Gondar, Ethiopia. Design/methodology/approach: The study employed a mixed research approach and an explanatory design. A multi- stage sampling was used to select 397 samples of respondents from three districts. As methods for gathering data, surveys, interviews and focus group discussions were all employed. Percentages, averages, t-tests, analysis of variance, regression models and thematic analysis were used to analyze the data. Findings: More than half of the respondents (57.2%) were unable to know what tourist is, even though the study found that 93.5% of respondents had a fair understanding of what tourism involved. Nearly three-quarters of the respondents said that their main sources of tourism-related information were their friends and the government. In the multiple regression model, all independent variables together account for about 38.7% of the total variance in the dependent variable. Only three factors significantly contributed to the prediction of the variation in ecotourism support: ecotourism benefit (β = 24, p = 0.001, gender (β =0.47, p = 0.000), and family size (β=0.12, p =.005. Research limitations/implications: Variables, time, and space were limitations on this study. All elements influencing local communities' support for ecotourism development were not exhaustively considered. This research may not apply to other places with differing social, cultural, and environmental settings. This study is also cross-sectional, which means it does not provide information on how local understanding and support for ecotourism may evolve over time. Originality/value: Many studies have examined the consequences of tourism on host communities and tourist attitudes toward ecotourism, but few have examined local understanding and support of ecotourism development. As a result, this study can provide novel perspectives and knowledge that can enhance comprehension of this phenomenon, influence policymaking and practical applications, and ultimately foster the progression of the field.