先进ART技术后3028例单胎新生儿的产科和新生儿结局:射精卵浆内精子注射、人工卵母细胞激活、体外成熟和睾丸精子提取

H. Hattori, Yuko Atsumi, Y. Nakajo, N. Aono, M. Koizumi, M. Toya, H. Igarashi, K. Kyono
{"title":"先进ART技术后3028例单胎新生儿的产科和新生儿结局:射精卵浆内精子注射、人工卵母细胞激活、体外成熟和睾丸精子提取","authors":"H. Hattori, Yuko Atsumi, Y. Nakajo, N. Aono, M. Koizumi, M. Toya, H. Igarashi, K. Kyono","doi":"10.1142/s2661318221500031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To evaluate obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of singletons conceived after advanced assisted reproductive technology (ART) techniques: conventional IVF pregnancies (C-IVF), ejaculated sperm intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), assisted oocyte activation (AOA), in vitro maturation (IVM), and testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Methods: The subjects were 3,028 singletons who were born after fresh or frozen embryo transfer. The subjects were separated into five groups: C-IVF (n = 855), ICSI (n = 1,869), AOA (n = 42), IVM (n = 32), and TESE (n = 230). We evaluated obstetrical and neonatal outcomes calculating the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) using multivariable logistic regression analyses for fresh and frozen embryos and for cleavage and blastocyst transfer. The C-IVF group was used as a background control for the ICSI group. Moreover, the TESE, AOA, and IVM groups were compared to the ICSI group to evaluate the effects of the ICSI procedure itself. Results: The incidence of perinatal complications was significantly lower in the ICSI-fresh group (AOR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.10–0.83, p ¡ 0.05). Regarding sex ratio, the IVM was significantly associated with sex ratio imbalance toward female in both fresh and frozen groups (AOR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10–0.96, AOR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.07–0.98, p ¡ 0.05). On the other hand, there were no significant differences in preterm birth rate, low birth weight rate and congenital abnormalities rate between conventional IVF, ICSI, and the other groups. Conclusions: There were no negative effects on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between conventional IVF and ICSI. Although this was a limited sample size study, advanced ART technologies such as AOA, IVM, and TESE also seem to have a low risk of adverse impact on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes but may have a slight impact on sex ratio.","PeriodicalId":34382,"journal":{"name":"Fertility Reproduction","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes of 3,028 Singletons Born After Advanced ART Techniques: Ejaculated Sperm Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection, Artificial Oocyte Activation, in Vitro Maturation and Testicular Sperm Extraction\",\"authors\":\"H. Hattori, Yuko Atsumi, Y. Nakajo, N. Aono, M. Koizumi, M. Toya, H. Igarashi, K. Kyono\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s2661318221500031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: To evaluate obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of singletons conceived after advanced assisted reproductive technology (ART) techniques: conventional IVF pregnancies (C-IVF), ejaculated sperm intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), assisted oocyte activation (AOA), in vitro maturation (IVM), and testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Methods: The subjects were 3,028 singletons who were born after fresh or frozen embryo transfer. The subjects were separated into five groups: C-IVF (n = 855), ICSI (n = 1,869), AOA (n = 42), IVM (n = 32), and TESE (n = 230). We evaluated obstetrical and neonatal outcomes calculating the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) using multivariable logistic regression analyses for fresh and frozen embryos and for cleavage and blastocyst transfer. The C-IVF group was used as a background control for the ICSI group. Moreover, the TESE, AOA, and IVM groups were compared to the ICSI group to evaluate the effects of the ICSI procedure itself. Results: The incidence of perinatal complications was significantly lower in the ICSI-fresh group (AOR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.10–0.83, p ¡ 0.05). Regarding sex ratio, the IVM was significantly associated with sex ratio imbalance toward female in both fresh and frozen groups (AOR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10–0.96, AOR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.07–0.98, p ¡ 0.05). On the other hand, there were no significant differences in preterm birth rate, low birth weight rate and congenital abnormalities rate between conventional IVF, ICSI, and the other groups. Conclusions: There were no negative effects on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between conventional IVF and ICSI. Although this was a limited sample size study, advanced ART technologies such as AOA, IVM, and TESE also seem to have a low risk of adverse impact on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes but may have a slight impact on sex ratio.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fertility Reproduction\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fertility Reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2661318221500031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility Reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2661318221500031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评估先进辅助生殖技术(ART)技术后单胎妊娠的产科和新生儿结局:常规IVF妊娠(C-IVF)、精精胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)、辅助卵母细胞激活(AOA)、体外成熟(IVM)和睾丸精子提取(TESE)。方法:以新鲜或冷冻胚胎移植后出生的单胎3028例为研究对象。受试者分为5组:C-IVF (n = 855)、ICSI (n = 1869)、AOA (n = 42)、IVM (n = 32)和TESE (n = 230)。我们使用多变量logistic回归分析计算新鲜和冷冻胚胎以及卵裂和囊胚移植的调整优势比(AOR)来评估产科和新生儿结局。C-IVF组作为ICSI组的背景对照。此外,将TESE、AOA和IVM组与ICSI组进行比较,以评估ICSI手术本身的效果。结果:ICSI-fresh组围产期并发症发生率明显低于对照组(AOR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.10 ~ 0.83, p < 0.05)。在性别比方面,新鲜组和冷冻组的IVM与女性性别比失衡显著相关(AOR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10 ~ 0.96; AOR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.07 ~ 0.98, p < 0.05)。另一方面,在早产率、低出生体重率和先天性异常率方面,常规IVF、ICSI组与其他组无显著差异。结论:常规IVF和ICSI对产科和新生儿结局没有负面影响。虽然这是一项样本量有限的研究,但先进的ART技术,如AOA、IVM和TESE,似乎对产科和新生儿结局的不良影响风险也很低,但可能对性别比例有轻微影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes of 3,028 Singletons Born After Advanced ART Techniques: Ejaculated Sperm Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection, Artificial Oocyte Activation, in Vitro Maturation and Testicular Sperm Extraction
Background: To evaluate obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of singletons conceived after advanced assisted reproductive technology (ART) techniques: conventional IVF pregnancies (C-IVF), ejaculated sperm intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), assisted oocyte activation (AOA), in vitro maturation (IVM), and testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Methods: The subjects were 3,028 singletons who were born after fresh or frozen embryo transfer. The subjects were separated into five groups: C-IVF (n = 855), ICSI (n = 1,869), AOA (n = 42), IVM (n = 32), and TESE (n = 230). We evaluated obstetrical and neonatal outcomes calculating the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) using multivariable logistic regression analyses for fresh and frozen embryos and for cleavage and blastocyst transfer. The C-IVF group was used as a background control for the ICSI group. Moreover, the TESE, AOA, and IVM groups were compared to the ICSI group to evaluate the effects of the ICSI procedure itself. Results: The incidence of perinatal complications was significantly lower in the ICSI-fresh group (AOR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.10–0.83, p ¡ 0.05). Regarding sex ratio, the IVM was significantly associated with sex ratio imbalance toward female in both fresh and frozen groups (AOR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10–0.96, AOR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.07–0.98, p ¡ 0.05). On the other hand, there were no significant differences in preterm birth rate, low birth weight rate and congenital abnormalities rate between conventional IVF, ICSI, and the other groups. Conclusions: There were no negative effects on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between conventional IVF and ICSI. Although this was a limited sample size study, advanced ART technologies such as AOA, IVM, and TESE also seem to have a low risk of adverse impact on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes but may have a slight impact on sex ratio.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信