单侧膝关节延伸桥试验中横平面盆腔对齐测量的可靠性

Juliana A. Andrade, L. C. Figueiredo, T. T. Santos, Ana Paula, N. Bittencourt, S. T. Fonseca
{"title":"单侧膝关节延伸桥试验中横平面盆腔对齐测量的可靠性","authors":"Juliana A. Andrade, L. C. Figueiredo, T. T. Santos, Ana Paula, N. Bittencourt, S. T. Fonseca","doi":"10.1590/S1413-35552012000400007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The bridge test with unilateral knee extension evaluates the stability of the trunk and pelvis. The evaluation of this stability can contribute to the understanding of the occurrence of musculoskeletal injuries. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a qualitative analysis and intra-test reliability of a quantitative analysis of transverse plane pelvic alignment during the bridge test with unilateral knee extension. METHOD: Thirty participants (24.73±4.24 years old) were tested. The qualitative analysis was conducted by asking two raters to judge the transverse plane pelvic alignment and its reliability was assessed with the weighted kappa coefficient (kw). The quantitative analysis was conducted by measuring the greatest pelvic tilt angle in transverse plane and its reliability was assessed by use of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); the mean change, which was evaluated using 95% confidence interval of the mean difference (95%CI ) and Bland-Altman plot; and the quantification of measurement variability, which was assessed using standard error of measurement (SEM) and the coefficient of variation of the typical error (CVTE). In addition, the minimal detectable change (MDC95) was determined. RESULTS: The intra-rater reliability ranged from fair to moderate (kw=0.32 to 0.58) and the inter-rater reliability was substantial (kw=0.80). The intra-test reliability was excellent (ICC=0.82), the 95% CI ranged from -0.51o to 1.99o, the SEM was 2.38o and the CVTE was 28.75%. The MDC95 was 6.59o. CONCLUSIONS: The inter-rater reliability was greater than the intra-rater reliability; the intra-test reliability was excellent and showed no systematic or random error.","PeriodicalId":21195,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","volume":"66 1","pages":"268-274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confiabilidade da mensuração do alinhamento pélvico no plano transverso durante o teste da ponte com extensão unilateral do joelho\",\"authors\":\"Juliana A. Andrade, L. C. Figueiredo, T. T. Santos, Ana Paula, N. Bittencourt, S. T. Fonseca\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S1413-35552012000400007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: The bridge test with unilateral knee extension evaluates the stability of the trunk and pelvis. The evaluation of this stability can contribute to the understanding of the occurrence of musculoskeletal injuries. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a qualitative analysis and intra-test reliability of a quantitative analysis of transverse plane pelvic alignment during the bridge test with unilateral knee extension. METHOD: Thirty participants (24.73±4.24 years old) were tested. The qualitative analysis was conducted by asking two raters to judge the transverse plane pelvic alignment and its reliability was assessed with the weighted kappa coefficient (kw). The quantitative analysis was conducted by measuring the greatest pelvic tilt angle in transverse plane and its reliability was assessed by use of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); the mean change, which was evaluated using 95% confidence interval of the mean difference (95%CI ) and Bland-Altman plot; and the quantification of measurement variability, which was assessed using standard error of measurement (SEM) and the coefficient of variation of the typical error (CVTE). In addition, the minimal detectable change (MDC95) was determined. RESULTS: The intra-rater reliability ranged from fair to moderate (kw=0.32 to 0.58) and the inter-rater reliability was substantial (kw=0.80). The intra-test reliability was excellent (ICC=0.82), the 95% CI ranged from -0.51o to 1.99o, the SEM was 2.38o and the CVTE was 28.75%. The MDC95 was 6.59o. CONCLUSIONS: The inter-rater reliability was greater than the intra-rater reliability; the intra-test reliability was excellent and showed no systematic or random error.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"268-274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552012000400007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552012000400007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

背景:单侧膝关节伸展的桥式试验评估躯干和骨盆的稳定性。这种稳定性的评估有助于理解肌肉骨骼损伤的发生。目的:探讨在单侧膝关节伸展桥试验中,定性分析的内部和内部信度以及定量分析的内部信度。方法:30名参与者(24.73±4.24岁)接受测试。采用两名评分者对骨盆横切面对准进行定性分析,并用加权kappa系数(kw)评价其可靠性。通过测量骨盆横切面最大倾斜角进行定量分析,并用类内相关系数(ICC)评价其可靠性;均值变化,采用均值差的95%置信区间(95% ci)和Bland-Altman图进行评估;测量变异性的量化,采用测量标准误差(SEM)和典型误差变异系数(CVTE)进行评估。此外,还测定了最小可检测变化(MDC95)。结果:量表内信度范围为一般到中等(kw=0.32 ~ 0.58),量表间信度相当(kw=0.80)。试验内信度极好(ICC=0.82), 95% CI范围为-0.51 ~ 1.99,SEM为2.38,CVTE为28.75%。MDC95为6.59。结论:评估间信度大于评估内信度;试验内信度极好,无系统或随机误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Confiabilidade da mensuração do alinhamento pélvico no plano transverso durante o teste da ponte com extensão unilateral do joelho
BACKGROUND: The bridge test with unilateral knee extension evaluates the stability of the trunk and pelvis. The evaluation of this stability can contribute to the understanding of the occurrence of musculoskeletal injuries. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a qualitative analysis and intra-test reliability of a quantitative analysis of transverse plane pelvic alignment during the bridge test with unilateral knee extension. METHOD: Thirty participants (24.73±4.24 years old) were tested. The qualitative analysis was conducted by asking two raters to judge the transverse plane pelvic alignment and its reliability was assessed with the weighted kappa coefficient (kw). The quantitative analysis was conducted by measuring the greatest pelvic tilt angle in transverse plane and its reliability was assessed by use of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); the mean change, which was evaluated using 95% confidence interval of the mean difference (95%CI ) and Bland-Altman plot; and the quantification of measurement variability, which was assessed using standard error of measurement (SEM) and the coefficient of variation of the typical error (CVTE). In addition, the minimal detectable change (MDC95) was determined. RESULTS: The intra-rater reliability ranged from fair to moderate (kw=0.32 to 0.58) and the inter-rater reliability was substantial (kw=0.80). The intra-test reliability was excellent (ICC=0.82), the 95% CI ranged from -0.51o to 1.99o, the SEM was 2.38o and the CVTE was 28.75%. The MDC95 was 6.59o. CONCLUSIONS: The inter-rater reliability was greater than the intra-rater reliability; the intra-test reliability was excellent and showed no systematic or random error.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信