坦桑尼亚东北部感染糖尿病足溃疡需氧细菌分离物的抗生素耐药性:紧急呼吁建立医院抗菌药物管理委员会

Ahmed Shabhay, P. Horumpende, Martin R Mujuni, Edna-Joy Munisi, S. Mshana, Z. Shabhay, A. Mganga, K. Chilonga, D. Msuya, J. Chilongola, J. Baal, Samwel Chugulu
{"title":"坦桑尼亚东北部感染糖尿病足溃疡需氧细菌分离物的抗生素耐药性:紧急呼吁建立医院抗菌药物管理委员会","authors":"Ahmed Shabhay, P. Horumpende, Martin R Mujuni, Edna-Joy Munisi, S. Mshana, Z. Shabhay, A. Mganga, K. Chilonga, D. Msuya, J. Chilongola, J. Baal, Samwel Chugulu","doi":"10.21203/RS.3.RS-569062/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background.\n\nDiabetic foot ulcers (DFU) is among major health problems which impact the socio economic burden globally. We aimed at assessing the susceptibility pattern of antimicrobials in DFU infections among patients admitted in the Surgical Department at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC).\nMethods.\n\nThis descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from September 2018 through March 2019. Pus swabs were collected on the first day of admission by deep wound swabbing after irrigation with normal saline solution. Kirby-Bauer method was done according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines.\nResults.\n\nSixty diabetic ulcer patients had 62 bacterial isolates. Majority of the isolates were gram negative 49/62(79.03%). The most common isolate was Escherichia coli 15/62(24.19%) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 14/62(22.58%), Proteus mirabilis 8/62(12.9%) and Staphylococcus aureus 5/62(8.06%). Klebsiella pneumoniae, Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus, Proteus Vulgaris, and Streptococcus pyogenes each contributed 4/62(6.25%) isolates. Of the 49/62(79.3%) gram negative isolates, 8/49(16.33%) were mono resistant, 30/49(61.22%) were multiresistant, and 11/49(22.45%) were susceptible. Of the multi-resistant isolates, E. coli 12/15(80.00%), and P.aeruginosa 7/14(50.00%) were predominant. A total of 39/62(62.90%) isolates in patients contributed to poorer outcomes including loss of body part. Patients with ulcers infected by P. aeruginosa 11/39 (28.21%) had the highest number of surgical removal of body parts followed by E. coli 8/39(20.51%). Gram negative bacteria were highly susceptible to amikacin 91.18%, meropenem 93.33% and imipenem 95.24%. Isolates susceptibility to ceftriaxone was 32%.\nConclusions.\n\nAmikacin, meropenem and imipenem can be safely used as broad-spectrum antimicrobials in DFU. The Standard of care remains culture and sensitivity of isolated microorganisms in combating diabetic foot ulcers infections.","PeriodicalId":13901,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic Resistance in Aerobic Bacterial Isolates From Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers in North Eastern Tanzania: An Urgent Call to Establish A Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Committee\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Shabhay, P. Horumpende, Martin R Mujuni, Edna-Joy Munisi, S. Mshana, Z. Shabhay, A. Mganga, K. Chilonga, D. Msuya, J. Chilongola, J. Baal, Samwel Chugulu\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/RS.3.RS-569062/V1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Background.\\n\\nDiabetic foot ulcers (DFU) is among major health problems which impact the socio economic burden globally. We aimed at assessing the susceptibility pattern of antimicrobials in DFU infections among patients admitted in the Surgical Department at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC).\\nMethods.\\n\\nThis descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from September 2018 through March 2019. Pus swabs were collected on the first day of admission by deep wound swabbing after irrigation with normal saline solution. Kirby-Bauer method was done according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines.\\nResults.\\n\\nSixty diabetic ulcer patients had 62 bacterial isolates. Majority of the isolates were gram negative 49/62(79.03%). The most common isolate was Escherichia coli 15/62(24.19%) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 14/62(22.58%), Proteus mirabilis 8/62(12.9%) and Staphylococcus aureus 5/62(8.06%). Klebsiella pneumoniae, Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus, Proteus Vulgaris, and Streptococcus pyogenes each contributed 4/62(6.25%) isolates. Of the 49/62(79.3%) gram negative isolates, 8/49(16.33%) were mono resistant, 30/49(61.22%) were multiresistant, and 11/49(22.45%) were susceptible. Of the multi-resistant isolates, E. coli 12/15(80.00%), and P.aeruginosa 7/14(50.00%) were predominant. A total of 39/62(62.90%) isolates in patients contributed to poorer outcomes including loss of body part. Patients with ulcers infected by P. aeruginosa 11/39 (28.21%) had the highest number of surgical removal of body parts followed by E. coli 8/39(20.51%). Gram negative bacteria were highly susceptible to amikacin 91.18%, meropenem 93.33% and imipenem 95.24%. Isolates susceptibility to ceftriaxone was 32%.\\nConclusions.\\n\\nAmikacin, meropenem and imipenem can be safely used as broad-spectrum antimicrobials in DFU. The Standard of care remains culture and sensitivity of isolated microorganisms in combating diabetic foot ulcers infections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-569062/V1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-569062/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景。糖尿病足溃疡是影响全球社会经济负担的主要健康问题之一。我们的目的是评估乞力马扎罗山基督教医疗中心(KCMC)外科收治的DFU感染患者对抗生素的敏感性。这项描述性横断面研究于2018年9月至2019年3月进行。入院第一天取脓液拭子,深创面拭子,生理盐水冲洗。结果:60例糖尿病性溃疡患者分离到62株细菌。革兰氏阴性49/62占多数(79.03%)。最常见的是大肠杆菌15/62(24.19%),其次是铜绿假单胞菌14/62(22.58%)、神奇变形杆菌8/62(12.9%)和金黄色葡萄球菌5/62(8.06%)。肺炎克雷伯菌、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌、普通变形杆菌和化脓性链球菌各占4/62株(6.25%)。49/62株(79.3%)革兰阴性菌株中,单耐药8/49株(16.33%),多重耐药30/49株(61.22%),易感11/49株(22.45%)。多重耐药菌株以大肠杆菌12/15(80.00%)和铜绿假单胞菌7/14(50.00%)为主。患者中共有39/62(62.90%)分离株导致较差的预后,包括身体部分丧失。感染铜绿假单胞菌11/39的溃疡患者手术切除身体部位最多(28.21%),其次是大肠杆菌8/39(20.51%)。革兰氏阴性菌对阿米卡星(91.18%)、美罗培南(93.33%)和亚胺培南(95.24%)敏感。分离株对头孢曲松的敏感性为32%。阿米卡星、美罗培南和亚胺培南可作为广谱抗菌剂在DFU中安全使用。护理标准仍然是培养和敏感性的分离微生物在对抗糖尿病足溃疡感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antibiotic Resistance in Aerobic Bacterial Isolates From Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers in North Eastern Tanzania: An Urgent Call to Establish A Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Committee
Background. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) is among major health problems which impact the socio economic burden globally. We aimed at assessing the susceptibility pattern of antimicrobials in DFU infections among patients admitted in the Surgical Department at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC). Methods. This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from September 2018 through March 2019. Pus swabs were collected on the first day of admission by deep wound swabbing after irrigation with normal saline solution. Kirby-Bauer method was done according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Results. Sixty diabetic ulcer patients had 62 bacterial isolates. Majority of the isolates were gram negative 49/62(79.03%). The most common isolate was Escherichia coli 15/62(24.19%) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 14/62(22.58%), Proteus mirabilis 8/62(12.9%) and Staphylococcus aureus 5/62(8.06%). Klebsiella pneumoniae, Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus, Proteus Vulgaris, and Streptococcus pyogenes each contributed 4/62(6.25%) isolates. Of the 49/62(79.3%) gram negative isolates, 8/49(16.33%) were mono resistant, 30/49(61.22%) were multiresistant, and 11/49(22.45%) were susceptible. Of the multi-resistant isolates, E. coli 12/15(80.00%), and P.aeruginosa 7/14(50.00%) were predominant. A total of 39/62(62.90%) isolates in patients contributed to poorer outcomes including loss of body part. Patients with ulcers infected by P. aeruginosa 11/39 (28.21%) had the highest number of surgical removal of body parts followed by E. coli 8/39(20.51%). Gram negative bacteria were highly susceptible to amikacin 91.18%, meropenem 93.33% and imipenem 95.24%. Isolates susceptibility to ceftriaxone was 32%. Conclusions. Amikacin, meropenem and imipenem can be safely used as broad-spectrum antimicrobials in DFU. The Standard of care remains culture and sensitivity of isolated microorganisms in combating diabetic foot ulcers infections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信