红花提取物的清除率及金属螯合电位研究

Rashmi Dehariya, Jagriti Chandrakar, S. Dubey, K. Ojha, A. Dixit
{"title":"红花提取物的清除率及金属螯合电位研究","authors":"Rashmi Dehariya, Jagriti Chandrakar, S. Dubey, K. Ojha, A. Dixit","doi":"10.25081/cb.2020.v11.6009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carthamus tinctorius leaves were extracted with methanol and distilled water. The extracts were evaluated for their potential free radical scavenging capacity using four different in vitro methods (DPPH, metal chelation, radical removal and hydrogen peroxide scavenging methods). The total phenolic content obtained for aqueous (112. 2±1.708 GAE mg/g) and for methanolic extract (89.66±2.00 GAE mg/g). In DPPH IC50 values was found to be 176.66±2.08 and 278.33±1.52 and 310.33±1.52 for the ascorbic acid, aqueous and methanolic extract respectively. In superoxide radical scavenging IC50values are 381.27±1.43, 544.42±2 and 606.78±3.02 μg/ml for the ascorbic acid, aqueous and methanolic extract respectively. In the metal chelating activity, IC50 values are 385.94±3.00, 337±1 and 487±0.984 μg/ml for the EDTA, aqueous extract and methanolic extract respectively. In hydrogen peroxide scavenging IC50 values were 261±1, 278±3.52 and 370±1 μg/ml for the ascorbic acid, aqueous extract and methanolic leaf extract of Carthamus tinctorius respectively. The correlation suggests that phenolic compounds are responsible for the antioxidant activities of leaves.","PeriodicalId":10828,"journal":{"name":"Current Botany","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scavenging and metal chelating potential of Carthamus tinctorius L. extracts\",\"authors\":\"Rashmi Dehariya, Jagriti Chandrakar, S. Dubey, K. Ojha, A. Dixit\",\"doi\":\"10.25081/cb.2020.v11.6009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Carthamus tinctorius leaves were extracted with methanol and distilled water. The extracts were evaluated for their potential free radical scavenging capacity using four different in vitro methods (DPPH, metal chelation, radical removal and hydrogen peroxide scavenging methods). The total phenolic content obtained for aqueous (112. 2±1.708 GAE mg/g) and for methanolic extract (89.66±2.00 GAE mg/g). In DPPH IC50 values was found to be 176.66±2.08 and 278.33±1.52 and 310.33±1.52 for the ascorbic acid, aqueous and methanolic extract respectively. In superoxide radical scavenging IC50values are 381.27±1.43, 544.42±2 and 606.78±3.02 μg/ml for the ascorbic acid, aqueous and methanolic extract respectively. In the metal chelating activity, IC50 values are 385.94±3.00, 337±1 and 487±0.984 μg/ml for the EDTA, aqueous extract and methanolic extract respectively. In hydrogen peroxide scavenging IC50 values were 261±1, 278±3.52 and 370±1 μg/ml for the ascorbic acid, aqueous extract and methanolic leaf extract of Carthamus tinctorius respectively. The correlation suggests that phenolic compounds are responsible for the antioxidant activities of leaves.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Botany\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25081/cb.2020.v11.6009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Botany","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25081/cb.2020.v11.6009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

用甲醇和蒸馏水对红花叶进行提取。采用四种不同的体外方法(DPPH法、金属螯合法、自由基清除法和过氧化氢清除法)评估了提取物的潜在自由基清除能力。得到水溶液(112)的总酚含量。2±1.708 GAE mg/g)和甲醇提取物(89.66±2.00 GAE mg/g)。在DPPH中,抗坏血酸、水提液和甲醇提液的IC50分别为176.66±2.08、278.33±1.52和310.33±1.52。抗坏血酸、水提物和甲醇提物对超氧自由基的ic50值分别为381.27±1.43、544.42±2和606.78±3.02 μg/ml。EDTA、水提物和甲醇提物的IC50值分别为385.94±3.00、337±1和487±0.984 μg/ml。在过氧化氢清除中,红花抗坏血酸、水提物和甲醇叶提物的IC50值分别为261±1、278±3.52和370±1 μg/ml。这一相关性表明酚类化合物与叶片的抗氧化活性有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scavenging and metal chelating potential of Carthamus tinctorius L. extracts
Carthamus tinctorius leaves were extracted with methanol and distilled water. The extracts were evaluated for their potential free radical scavenging capacity using four different in vitro methods (DPPH, metal chelation, radical removal and hydrogen peroxide scavenging methods). The total phenolic content obtained for aqueous (112. 2±1.708 GAE mg/g) and for methanolic extract (89.66±2.00 GAE mg/g). In DPPH IC50 values was found to be 176.66±2.08 and 278.33±1.52 and 310.33±1.52 for the ascorbic acid, aqueous and methanolic extract respectively. In superoxide radical scavenging IC50values are 381.27±1.43, 544.42±2 and 606.78±3.02 μg/ml for the ascorbic acid, aqueous and methanolic extract respectively. In the metal chelating activity, IC50 values are 385.94±3.00, 337±1 and 487±0.984 μg/ml for the EDTA, aqueous extract and methanolic extract respectively. In hydrogen peroxide scavenging IC50 values were 261±1, 278±3.52 and 370±1 μg/ml for the ascorbic acid, aqueous extract and methanolic leaf extract of Carthamus tinctorius respectively. The correlation suggests that phenolic compounds are responsible for the antioxidant activities of leaves.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信