《德意志联邦共和国农业法》对生物多样性的保护

Q1 Arts and Humanities
S. Ingelkofer
{"title":"《德意志联邦共和国农业法》对生物多样性的保护","authors":"S. Ingelkofer","doi":"10.51634/2307-5201_2022_2_73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the Agricultural Act of the Federal Republic of Germany. In the discussion the existing and relevant regulations that serve to protect biodiversity are examined. Firstly, the main issues and challenges of the Agricultural Act are identified. The core question here is how ecological common goods such as soil, water, air and climate and the effective protection of biodiversity, can be success-fully protected, despite the land being used for agriculture. Article 20a of the Basic Law of Germany could provide an answer as it states, that a ‘State goal’ is to protect the ‘natural foundations of life’. Thus, the national legislature may be obliged to regulate the activities of the predominantly private operators in agriculture, as they have a direct impact on the ecological common goods listed above. The current gaps in the Agricultural Act are then specified and, in this context, the principle of ‘Good Professional Practice’ is discussed. This example shows that mere principles, as they exist today in the German legal system, are too vague and ineffec-tive. Therefore, it is of crucial importance to formulate the requirements for agricultural land use as directly applicable obligations and the term ‘Good Professional Practice’ must be expanded on with concrete and binding content. Finally, suggestions are made as to how the Agriculture Act can achieve the protection of biodiversity more effectively. For example, the Fertilizer Act could be transferred to the Agriculture Act as well as the regulations concerning the use of plant protection products on agricultural land.","PeriodicalId":37986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law, Religion and State","volume":"320 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protection of Biodiversity in the Agricultural Act of the Federal Republic of Germany\",\"authors\":\"S. Ingelkofer\",\"doi\":\"10.51634/2307-5201_2022_2_73\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article focuses on the Agricultural Act of the Federal Republic of Germany. In the discussion the existing and relevant regulations that serve to protect biodiversity are examined. Firstly, the main issues and challenges of the Agricultural Act are identified. The core question here is how ecological common goods such as soil, water, air and climate and the effective protection of biodiversity, can be success-fully protected, despite the land being used for agriculture. Article 20a of the Basic Law of Germany could provide an answer as it states, that a ‘State goal’ is to protect the ‘natural foundations of life’. Thus, the national legislature may be obliged to regulate the activities of the predominantly private operators in agriculture, as they have a direct impact on the ecological common goods listed above. The current gaps in the Agricultural Act are then specified and, in this context, the principle of ‘Good Professional Practice’ is discussed. This example shows that mere principles, as they exist today in the German legal system, are too vague and ineffec-tive. Therefore, it is of crucial importance to formulate the requirements for agricultural land use as directly applicable obligations and the term ‘Good Professional Practice’ must be expanded on with concrete and binding content. Finally, suggestions are made as to how the Agriculture Act can achieve the protection of biodiversity more effectively. For example, the Fertilizer Act could be transferred to the Agriculture Act as well as the regulations concerning the use of plant protection products on agricultural land.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law, Religion and State\",\"volume\":\"320 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law, Religion and State\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51634/2307-5201_2022_2_73\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law, Religion and State","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51634/2307-5201_2022_2_73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以《德意志联邦共和国农业法》为研究对象。在讨论中,审查了保护生物多样性的现有和相关法规。首先,确定了《农业法》的主要问题和挑战。这里的核心问题是,在土地被用于农业的情况下,如何成功地保护土壤、水、空气和气候等生态公共产品以及对生物多样性的有效保护。《德国基本法》第20a条可以提供一个答案,因为它指出,“国家目标”是保护“生命的自然基础”。因此,国家立法机关可能有义务管制农业中主要私营经营者的活动,因为它们对上述生态共同利益有直接影响。然后详细说明了《农业法》中目前的差距,并在此背景下讨论了“良好的专业实践”原则。这个例子表明,今天在德国法律体系中存在的纯粹原则过于模糊和无效。因此,制定对农业用地的要求作为直接适用的义务是至关重要的,“良好的专业实践”一词必须扩展为具体和有约束力的内容。最后,对《农业法》如何更有效地实现对生物多样性的保护提出了建议。例如,《肥料法》以及有关在农业用地上使用植物保护产品的规定可以转移到《农业法》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protection of Biodiversity in the Agricultural Act of the Federal Republic of Germany
This article focuses on the Agricultural Act of the Federal Republic of Germany. In the discussion the existing and relevant regulations that serve to protect biodiversity are examined. Firstly, the main issues and challenges of the Agricultural Act are identified. The core question here is how ecological common goods such as soil, water, air and climate and the effective protection of biodiversity, can be success-fully protected, despite the land being used for agriculture. Article 20a of the Basic Law of Germany could provide an answer as it states, that a ‘State goal’ is to protect the ‘natural foundations of life’. Thus, the national legislature may be obliged to regulate the activities of the predominantly private operators in agriculture, as they have a direct impact on the ecological common goods listed above. The current gaps in the Agricultural Act are then specified and, in this context, the principle of ‘Good Professional Practice’ is discussed. This example shows that mere principles, as they exist today in the German legal system, are too vague and ineffec-tive. Therefore, it is of crucial importance to formulate the requirements for agricultural land use as directly applicable obligations and the term ‘Good Professional Practice’ must be expanded on with concrete and binding content. Finally, suggestions are made as to how the Agriculture Act can achieve the protection of biodiversity more effectively. For example, the Fertilizer Act could be transferred to the Agriculture Act as well as the regulations concerning the use of plant protection products on agricultural land.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Law, Religion and State
Journal of Law, Religion and State Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: The Journal of Law Religion and State provides an international forum for the study of the interactions between law and religion and between religion and state. It seeks to explore these interactions from legal and constitutional as well as from internal religious perspectives. The JLRS is a peer-reviewed journal that is committed to a broad and open discussion on a cross-cultural basis. Submission of articles in the following areas: religion and state; legal and political aspects of all religious traditions; comparative research of different religious legal systems and their interrelations are welcomed as are contributions from multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信