{"title":"有限完全k闭群","authors":"D. Churikov, C. Praeger","doi":"10.21538/0134-4889-2021-27-1-240-245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For a positive integer $k$, a group $G$ is said to be totally $k$-closed if in each of its faithful permutation representations, say on a set $\\Omega$, $G$ is the largest subgroup of $\\operatorname{Sym}(\\Omega)$ which leaves invariant each of the $G$-orbits in the induced action on $\\Omega\\times\\dots\\times \\Omega=\\Omega^k$. We prove that every abelian group $G$ is totally $(n(G)+1)$-closed, but is not totally $n(G)$-closed, where $n(G)$ is the number of invariant factors in the invariant factor decomposition of $G$. In particular, we prove that for each $k\\geq2$ and each prime $p$, there are infinitely many finite abelian $p$-groups which are totally $k$-closed but not totally $(k-1)$-closed. This result in the special case $k=2$ is due to Abdollahi and Arezoomand. We pose several open questions about total $k$-closure.","PeriodicalId":8427,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Group Theory","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finite totally k-closed groups\",\"authors\":\"D. Churikov, C. Praeger\",\"doi\":\"10.21538/0134-4889-2021-27-1-240-245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For a positive integer $k$, a group $G$ is said to be totally $k$-closed if in each of its faithful permutation representations, say on a set $\\\\Omega$, $G$ is the largest subgroup of $\\\\operatorname{Sym}(\\\\Omega)$ which leaves invariant each of the $G$-orbits in the induced action on $\\\\Omega\\\\times\\\\dots\\\\times \\\\Omega=\\\\Omega^k$. We prove that every abelian group $G$ is totally $(n(G)+1)$-closed, but is not totally $n(G)$-closed, where $n(G)$ is the number of invariant factors in the invariant factor decomposition of $G$. In particular, we prove that for each $k\\\\geq2$ and each prime $p$, there are infinitely many finite abelian $p$-groups which are totally $k$-closed but not totally $(k-1)$-closed. This result in the special case $k=2$ is due to Abdollahi and Arezoomand. We pose several open questions about total $k$-closure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: Group Theory\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: Group Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21538/0134-4889-2021-27-1-240-245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Group Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21538/0134-4889-2021-27-1-240-245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
For a positive integer $k$, a group $G$ is said to be totally $k$-closed if in each of its faithful permutation representations, say on a set $\Omega$, $G$ is the largest subgroup of $\operatorname{Sym}(\Omega)$ which leaves invariant each of the $G$-orbits in the induced action on $\Omega\times\dots\times \Omega=\Omega^k$. We prove that every abelian group $G$ is totally $(n(G)+1)$-closed, but is not totally $n(G)$-closed, where $n(G)$ is the number of invariant factors in the invariant factor decomposition of $G$. In particular, we prove that for each $k\geq2$ and each prime $p$, there are infinitely many finite abelian $p$-groups which are totally $k$-closed but not totally $(k-1)$-closed. This result in the special case $k=2$ is due to Abdollahi and Arezoomand. We pose several open questions about total $k$-closure.