文章、论文、章节、论文——谁赢得了知名度之战?

M. Weideman
{"title":"文章、论文、章节、论文——谁赢得了知名度之战?","authors":"M. Weideman","doi":"10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers need access to previous research to base their own work on. Some of the most commonly referenced materials are published in the form of journal articles, conference papers, books and book chapters, and research theses. The purpose of this research was to determine how these four categories of documents compare in terms of visibility to search engine crawlers. A questionnaire was used to gather data from international scholars on their completed research. Three types of queries were generated and over 3000 Web sites were inspected to determine the visibility of these outputs. Search engine result pages were inspected, and the rankings of the research documents were recorded and converted to a scoring system. The results have indicated that the four types of outputs enjoy varying degrees of exposure to search engines, with journal articles leading the way, and books/book chapters having the smallest degree of exposure to search engines. Some query types also produced better results than others. It was concluded that journal articles provide the best way to expose research work to Internet searchers through search engines.","PeriodicalId":92278,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries","volume":"69 1","pages":"479-480"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Articles, papers, chapters, theses - who wins the visibility wars?\",\"authors\":\"M. Weideman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Researchers need access to previous research to base their own work on. Some of the most commonly referenced materials are published in the form of journal articles, conference papers, books and book chapters, and research theses. The purpose of this research was to determine how these four categories of documents compare in terms of visibility to search engine crawlers. A questionnaire was used to gather data from international scholars on their completed research. Three types of queries were generated and over 3000 Web sites were inspected to determine the visibility of these outputs. Search engine result pages were inspected, and the rankings of the research documents were recorded and converted to a scoring system. The results have indicated that the four types of outputs enjoy varying degrees of exposure to search engines, with journal articles leading the way, and books/book chapters having the smallest degree of exposure to search engines. Some query types also produced better results than others. It was concluded that journal articles provide the best way to expose research work to Internet searchers through search engines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ... ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"479-480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ... ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员需要获得以前的研究成果来作为他们自己工作的基础。一些最常用的参考资料以期刊文章、会议论文、书籍和书籍章节以及研究论文的形式发表。本研究的目的是确定这四类文档在搜索引擎爬虫的可见性方面的比较。一份调查问卷用于收集国际学者完成研究的数据。生成了三种类型的查询,并检查了3000多个Web站点,以确定这些输出的可见性。检查搜索引擎结果页面,记录研究文件的排名并将其转换为评分系统。结果表明,这四种类型的输出对搜索引擎的曝光程度不同,其中期刊文章的曝光程度最高,而书籍/书籍章节的搜索引擎曝光程度最低。一些查询类型也比其他查询类型产生更好的结果。结论是,通过搜索引擎,期刊文章提供了向互联网搜索者展示研究成果的最佳途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Articles, papers, chapters, theses - who wins the visibility wars?
Researchers need access to previous research to base their own work on. Some of the most commonly referenced materials are published in the form of journal articles, conference papers, books and book chapters, and research theses. The purpose of this research was to determine how these four categories of documents compare in terms of visibility to search engine crawlers. A questionnaire was used to gather data from international scholars on their completed research. Three types of queries were generated and over 3000 Web sites were inspected to determine the visibility of these outputs. Search engine result pages were inspected, and the rankings of the research documents were recorded and converted to a scoring system. The results have indicated that the four types of outputs enjoy varying degrees of exposure to search engines, with journal articles leading the way, and books/book chapters having the smallest degree of exposure to search engines. Some query types also produced better results than others. It was concluded that journal articles provide the best way to expose research work to Internet searchers through search engines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信