化学和物理提取法提取水绵中EPS的效果比较

Shuiping Chang, Hwey-Lin Sheu, Yi-Chao Lee
{"title":"化学和物理提取法提取水绵中EPS的效果比较","authors":"Shuiping Chang, Hwey-Lin Sheu, Yi-Chao Lee","doi":"10.17706/ijbbb.2019.9.4.202-209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The algal extracellular polymeric sustances (EPS) have been studied as natural resources for a number of applications. For a macroalgae Spirogyra fluviatilis, the aboundant extracellular matrix on the surface of algae cell. EPS has a gel-like structure that could fractioned into loosely bound EPS (LB-EPS) and tightly bound EPS (TB-EPS). The contents and extraction rate of EPS were compared two chemical (formaldehyde-NaOH and NH4OH) and two physical (ultrasonication and heating) extraction methods. The analysis demonstrated that extraction rates of EPS followed heating (7.94 mg g-1 fresh algae) > ultrasonication (5.02 mg g-1 fresh algae) > formaldehyde-NaOH (3.12 mg g-1 fresh algae) > NH4OH (2.01 mg g-1 fresh algae). The protein to polysaccharides ratio (P/S) in EPS is between 0.23 to 0.35 by chemical methods and between 0.27 to 0.37 by physical methods. The P/S ratio is LB-EPS is higher than TB-EPS. The results indicated that the EPS could be efficiently extracted by the heating method, the influence of P/S ratios were obvious different.","PeriodicalId":13816,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of EPS Extraction Efficiences from Spirogyra fluviatilis by Chemical and Physical Extraction Methods\",\"authors\":\"Shuiping Chang, Hwey-Lin Sheu, Yi-Chao Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.17706/ijbbb.2019.9.4.202-209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The algal extracellular polymeric sustances (EPS) have been studied as natural resources for a number of applications. For a macroalgae Spirogyra fluviatilis, the aboundant extracellular matrix on the surface of algae cell. EPS has a gel-like structure that could fractioned into loosely bound EPS (LB-EPS) and tightly bound EPS (TB-EPS). The contents and extraction rate of EPS were compared two chemical (formaldehyde-NaOH and NH4OH) and two physical (ultrasonication and heating) extraction methods. The analysis demonstrated that extraction rates of EPS followed heating (7.94 mg g-1 fresh algae) > ultrasonication (5.02 mg g-1 fresh algae) > formaldehyde-NaOH (3.12 mg g-1 fresh algae) > NH4OH (2.01 mg g-1 fresh algae). The protein to polysaccharides ratio (P/S) in EPS is between 0.23 to 0.35 by chemical methods and between 0.27 to 0.37 by physical methods. The P/S ratio is LB-EPS is higher than TB-EPS. The results indicated that the EPS could be efficiently extracted by the heating method, the influence of P/S ratios were obvious different.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17706/ijbbb.2019.9.4.202-209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17706/ijbbb.2019.9.4.202-209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

藻类细胞外聚合物(EPS)作为一种天然资源被广泛应用。对于一种大型藻,水绵藻细胞表面丰富的细胞外基质。EPS具有凝胶状结构,可分为松散结合的EPS (LB-EPS)和紧密结合的EPS (TB-EPS)。比较了两种化学方法(甲醛- naoh和NH4OH)和两种物理方法(超声波和加热)提取EPS的含量和提取率。分析表明,EPS的提取率依次为加热(7.94 mg g-1鲜藻)、超声波(5.02 mg g-1鲜藻)、甲醛-氢氧化钠(3.12 mg g-1鲜藻)、氨水(2.01 mg g-1鲜藻)。化学法测定EPS的蛋白多糖比为0.23 ~ 0.35,物理法测定EPS的蛋白多糖比为0.27 ~ 0.37。市盈率为LB-EPS高于TB-EPS。结果表明:采用加热法提取EPS是有效的,但P/S比的影响有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of EPS Extraction Efficiences from Spirogyra fluviatilis by Chemical and Physical Extraction Methods
The algal extracellular polymeric sustances (EPS) have been studied as natural resources for a number of applications. For a macroalgae Spirogyra fluviatilis, the aboundant extracellular matrix on the surface of algae cell. EPS has a gel-like structure that could fractioned into loosely bound EPS (LB-EPS) and tightly bound EPS (TB-EPS). The contents and extraction rate of EPS were compared two chemical (formaldehyde-NaOH and NH4OH) and two physical (ultrasonication and heating) extraction methods. The analysis demonstrated that extraction rates of EPS followed heating (7.94 mg g-1 fresh algae) > ultrasonication (5.02 mg g-1 fresh algae) > formaldehyde-NaOH (3.12 mg g-1 fresh algae) > NH4OH (2.01 mg g-1 fresh algae). The protein to polysaccharides ratio (P/S) in EPS is between 0.23 to 0.35 by chemical methods and between 0.27 to 0.37 by physical methods. The P/S ratio is LB-EPS is higher than TB-EPS. The results indicated that the EPS could be efficiently extracted by the heating method, the influence of P/S ratios were obvious different.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信