经皮内镜联合治疗米特凡诺夫导管内膀胱肾结石

R. Inzillo, Jean Emmanuel Kwe, Elisa Simonetti, Riccardo Milandri, M. Grande, D. Campobasso, S. Ferretti, B. Rocco, S. Micali, A. Frattini
{"title":"经皮内镜联合治疗米特凡诺夫导管内膀胱肾结石","authors":"R. Inzillo, Jean Emmanuel Kwe, Elisa Simonetti, Riccardo Milandri, M. Grande, D. Campobasso, S. Ferretti, B. Rocco, S. Micali, A. Frattini","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction and Objectives: Treatment of bulky lithiasis in continent and non-continent urine storage reservoirs has been widely described and debated (1). Less is known about the optimal treatment in patients with a Mitrofanoff conduit. If voiding in these patients is incomplete, leading to recurrent symptomatic bacteriuria, formation of large lithiasis can be a common long-term complication (2, 3). Materials and Methods: This video describes a 19-year-old woman who underwent major open surgery at the age of six, with the configuration of a continent intestinal reservoir with a Mitrofanoff conduit. In 2020, she was referred to our center with a large stone in the reservoir and a minor stone in the inferior left renal calyx. We decided to proceed using a percutaneous approach with an “endovision technique” puncture for the bladder stone, combined with a retrograde intrarenal surgery for the renal stone. The MIP System “M size” was used to perform the percutaneous procedure, thus allowing a single-step dilation. The puncture and the dilation were followed endoscopically with a flexible ureterorenoscope avoiding the use of x-rays. The procedure was carried out as follows. The first step consisted in the insertion of a hydrophilic guidewire through the Mitrofanoff conduit. A flexible ureterorenoscope was then inserted coaxial to the guidewire. The percutaneous puncture, using an 80G needle, was followed endoscopically. Two guidewires were inserted, the first as a safety guidewire and the second for the tract dilation. The “single-step” dilation technique using the MIP system was performed and followed endoscopically. For the bladder lithotripsy, a dual-action lithotripter that combines ultrasonic and mechanical energy was used. Finally, a flexible ureterorenoscope and a basket for the retrieval of a single inferior caliceal stone were used. The procedure ended after positioning a single J stent in the left kidney and a nephrostomy tube in the reservoir. Results: The operative time was 80 minutes and the fluoroscopy time was 6 seconds. Hemoglobin and creatinine serum levels remained stable after the procedure and the patient was discharged on the third post-operative day, after removing both the single J and the nephrostomy tube. Follow-up lasted 12 months, with no bladder or renal stone recurrence, maintaining good continence of the Mitrofanoff conduit. Conclusion: In patients who have undergone several major surgeries a mini-invasive approach is advisable, not only for the morbidity of an open approach, but also for the increased risk of complications while handling an intestinal reservoir. Regarding a pure endoscopic approach, the passage of a nephroscope or a cystoscope through the Mitrofanoff conduit, combined with the continuous traction during the lithotripsy, could damage and compromise its continence. For this reason, the percutaneous approach is the most suitable method in these specific and rare cases.","PeriodicalId":13674,"journal":{"name":"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology","volume":"44 1","pages":"598 - 599"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous and endoscopic combined treatment of bladder and renal lithiasis in mitrofanoff conduit\",\"authors\":\"R. Inzillo, Jean Emmanuel Kwe, Elisa Simonetti, Riccardo Milandri, M. Grande, D. Campobasso, S. Ferretti, B. Rocco, S. Micali, A. Frattini\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Introduction and Objectives: Treatment of bulky lithiasis in continent and non-continent urine storage reservoirs has been widely described and debated (1). Less is known about the optimal treatment in patients with a Mitrofanoff conduit. If voiding in these patients is incomplete, leading to recurrent symptomatic bacteriuria, formation of large lithiasis can be a common long-term complication (2, 3). Materials and Methods: This video describes a 19-year-old woman who underwent major open surgery at the age of six, with the configuration of a continent intestinal reservoir with a Mitrofanoff conduit. In 2020, she was referred to our center with a large stone in the reservoir and a minor stone in the inferior left renal calyx. We decided to proceed using a percutaneous approach with an “endovision technique” puncture for the bladder stone, combined with a retrograde intrarenal surgery for the renal stone. The MIP System “M size” was used to perform the percutaneous procedure, thus allowing a single-step dilation. The puncture and the dilation were followed endoscopically with a flexible ureterorenoscope avoiding the use of x-rays. The procedure was carried out as follows. The first step consisted in the insertion of a hydrophilic guidewire through the Mitrofanoff conduit. A flexible ureterorenoscope was then inserted coaxial to the guidewire. The percutaneous puncture, using an 80G needle, was followed endoscopically. Two guidewires were inserted, the first as a safety guidewire and the second for the tract dilation. The “single-step” dilation technique using the MIP system was performed and followed endoscopically. For the bladder lithotripsy, a dual-action lithotripter that combines ultrasonic and mechanical energy was used. Finally, a flexible ureterorenoscope and a basket for the retrieval of a single inferior caliceal stone were used. The procedure ended after positioning a single J stent in the left kidney and a nephrostomy tube in the reservoir. Results: The operative time was 80 minutes and the fluoroscopy time was 6 seconds. Hemoglobin and creatinine serum levels remained stable after the procedure and the patient was discharged on the third post-operative day, after removing both the single J and the nephrostomy tube. Follow-up lasted 12 months, with no bladder or renal stone recurrence, maintaining good continence of the Mitrofanoff conduit. Conclusion: In patients who have undergone several major surgeries a mini-invasive approach is advisable, not only for the morbidity of an open approach, but also for the increased risk of complications while handling an intestinal reservoir. Regarding a pure endoscopic approach, the passage of a nephroscope or a cystoscope through the Mitrofanoff conduit, combined with the continuous traction during the lithotripsy, could damage and compromise its continence. For this reason, the percutaneous approach is the most suitable method in these specific and rare cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"598 - 599\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0815\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:导言和目的:在尿槽和非尿槽中治疗大块结石已经被广泛描述和争论(1)。对于米特罗法诺夫尿槽患者的最佳治疗方法知之甚少。如果这些患者排尿不完全,导致复发性症状性细菌尿,形成大结石可能是一个常见的长期并发症(2,3)。材料和方法:本视频描述了一名19岁的女性,她在6岁时接受了大的开放手术,配置了一个带有Mitrofanoff导管的大陆肠储液器。2020年,她因肾盂大结石和左下肾盂小结石转诊至我中心。我们决定继续采用经皮“内视技术”穿刺膀胱结石,并结合逆行肾内手术治疗肾结石。使用MIP系统“M尺寸”进行经皮手术,从而允许单步扩张。穿刺和扩张后,内镜下使用软性输尿管镜,避免使用x线。程序执行如下。第一步是通过Mitrofanoff导管插入亲水导丝。然后将柔性输尿管镜同轴插入导丝。经皮穿刺,使用80G针,内镜下进行。插入两根导丝,第一根作为安全导丝,第二根用于尿道扩张。使用MIP系统进行“单步”扩张技术,并在内窥镜下进行。膀胱碎石采用超声和机械能相结合的双作用碎石机。最后,使用软性输尿管镜和取石篮取出单个下盏结石。在左肾放置一个J型支架,在肾池放置肾造口管后,手术结束。结果:手术时间80分钟,透视时间6秒。术后血清血红蛋白和肌酐水平保持稳定,患者于术后第三天出院,同时取出单J管和肾造口管。随访12个月,无膀胱结石或肾结石复发,保持米特罗法诺夫输尿管良好的涵养。结论:在经历过多次大手术的患者中,微创入路是可取的,不仅考虑到开放入路的发病率,而且考虑到处理肠道储存库时并发症的风险增加。对于单纯的内镜入路,肾镜或膀胱镜通过Mitrofanoff导管,再加上在碎石过程中持续牵引,可能会破坏并损害其自控力。因此,经皮入路是这些特殊和罕见病例中最合适的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Percutaneous and endoscopic combined treatment of bladder and renal lithiasis in mitrofanoff conduit
ABSTRACT Introduction and Objectives: Treatment of bulky lithiasis in continent and non-continent urine storage reservoirs has been widely described and debated (1). Less is known about the optimal treatment in patients with a Mitrofanoff conduit. If voiding in these patients is incomplete, leading to recurrent symptomatic bacteriuria, formation of large lithiasis can be a common long-term complication (2, 3). Materials and Methods: This video describes a 19-year-old woman who underwent major open surgery at the age of six, with the configuration of a continent intestinal reservoir with a Mitrofanoff conduit. In 2020, she was referred to our center with a large stone in the reservoir and a minor stone in the inferior left renal calyx. We decided to proceed using a percutaneous approach with an “endovision technique” puncture for the bladder stone, combined with a retrograde intrarenal surgery for the renal stone. The MIP System “M size” was used to perform the percutaneous procedure, thus allowing a single-step dilation. The puncture and the dilation were followed endoscopically with a flexible ureterorenoscope avoiding the use of x-rays. The procedure was carried out as follows. The first step consisted in the insertion of a hydrophilic guidewire through the Mitrofanoff conduit. A flexible ureterorenoscope was then inserted coaxial to the guidewire. The percutaneous puncture, using an 80G needle, was followed endoscopically. Two guidewires were inserted, the first as a safety guidewire and the second for the tract dilation. The “single-step” dilation technique using the MIP system was performed and followed endoscopically. For the bladder lithotripsy, a dual-action lithotripter that combines ultrasonic and mechanical energy was used. Finally, a flexible ureterorenoscope and a basket for the retrieval of a single inferior caliceal stone were used. The procedure ended after positioning a single J stent in the left kidney and a nephrostomy tube in the reservoir. Results: The operative time was 80 minutes and the fluoroscopy time was 6 seconds. Hemoglobin and creatinine serum levels remained stable after the procedure and the patient was discharged on the third post-operative day, after removing both the single J and the nephrostomy tube. Follow-up lasted 12 months, with no bladder or renal stone recurrence, maintaining good continence of the Mitrofanoff conduit. Conclusion: In patients who have undergone several major surgeries a mini-invasive approach is advisable, not only for the morbidity of an open approach, but also for the increased risk of complications while handling an intestinal reservoir. Regarding a pure endoscopic approach, the passage of a nephroscope or a cystoscope through the Mitrofanoff conduit, combined with the continuous traction during the lithotripsy, could damage and compromise its continence. For this reason, the percutaneous approach is the most suitable method in these specific and rare cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信