作为治疗空间的南洋幻想的当下:香蕉吉本的《二次》中对纯净的渴望

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Sanghyuk Lee
{"title":"作为治疗空间的南洋幻想的当下:香蕉吉本的《二次》中对纯净的渴望","authors":"Sanghyuk Lee","doi":"10.22628/bcjjl.2022.15.1.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Yoshimoto banana of depicts “Nanyo” = Tihiti as a medium for healing and recovery. The space could be this medium because it was a place overflowing with purity and primacy. However, due to this desire for purity and primacy, the possibility of otherness = hybridity = uncanniness is castrated in the space. Therefore, the danger of a kind of modern violence is included in which talks about pure and beautiful healing and recovery. In addition, Yoshimoto Banana talks about connection with the world based on the assumption of “family” as the basis for restoring “pure me” and “primary me.” However, by setting the unit of “family,” the possibility of “me=subject” who continues to worry about himself, such as Kenzaburo Oe, is eliminated.Of course, this very point may be the possibility of “new literature,” and the background of the times in which individuals in the 2000s who cannot be the subject are being expressed. However, in reverse, it can also be read as a text that shows the danger that an individual in the impossibility of subjectivity in the 2000s can desire purity and unity and exclude and loathe “others.”","PeriodicalId":33066,"journal":{"name":"Gwagyeong Ilboneo Munhak Yeongu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Present of Nanyo Fantasy as a Healing Space:Desire for Purity in Banana Yoshimoto’s Niji\",\"authors\":\"Sanghyuk Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.22628/bcjjl.2022.15.1.71\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Yoshimoto banana of depicts “Nanyo” = Tihiti as a medium for healing and recovery. The space could be this medium because it was a place overflowing with purity and primacy. However, due to this desire for purity and primacy, the possibility of otherness = hybridity = uncanniness is castrated in the space. Therefore, the danger of a kind of modern violence is included in which talks about pure and beautiful healing and recovery. In addition, Yoshimoto Banana talks about connection with the world based on the assumption of “family” as the basis for restoring “pure me” and “primary me.” However, by setting the unit of “family,” the possibility of “me=subject” who continues to worry about himself, such as Kenzaburo Oe, is eliminated.Of course, this very point may be the possibility of “new literature,” and the background of the times in which individuals in the 2000s who cannot be the subject are being expressed. However, in reverse, it can also be read as a text that shows the danger that an individual in the impossibility of subjectivity in the 2000s can desire purity and unity and exclude and loathe “others.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":33066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gwagyeong Ilboneo Munhak Yeongu\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gwagyeong Ilboneo Munhak Yeongu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22628/bcjjl.2022.15.1.71\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gwagyeong Ilboneo Munhak Yeongu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22628/bcjjl.2022.15.1.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

吉本香蕉描绘了“Nanyo”= Tihiti作为治疗和恢复的媒介。这个空间可以是这种媒介,因为它是一个充满纯洁和至高无上的地方。然而,由于这种对纯粹和首要的渴望,他者=混杂=不可思议的可能性在空间中被阉割了。因此,一种现代暴力的危险被包含在谈论纯粹和美丽的治愈和恢复中。此外,香蕉吉本还以“家庭”的假设为基础,讨论了与世界的联系,以此作为恢复“纯粹的我”和“主要的我”的基础。但是,通过设置“家庭”这个单位,就排除了大江健三郎这样继续为自己担心的“我=主体”的可能性。当然,这一点也有可能是“新文学”的可能性,也有可能是无法成为主体的“00后”个体被表达的时代背景。然而,反过来,它也可以被解读为一种危险的文本,即在2000年代主体性的不可能性中,个人可以渴望纯粹和统一,排斥和厌恶“他者”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Present of Nanyo Fantasy as a Healing Space:Desire for Purity in Banana Yoshimoto’s Niji
The Yoshimoto banana of depicts “Nanyo” = Tihiti as a medium for healing and recovery. The space could be this medium because it was a place overflowing with purity and primacy. However, due to this desire for purity and primacy, the possibility of otherness = hybridity = uncanniness is castrated in the space. Therefore, the danger of a kind of modern violence is included in which talks about pure and beautiful healing and recovery. In addition, Yoshimoto Banana talks about connection with the world based on the assumption of “family” as the basis for restoring “pure me” and “primary me.” However, by setting the unit of “family,” the possibility of “me=subject” who continues to worry about himself, such as Kenzaburo Oe, is eliminated.Of course, this very point may be the possibility of “new literature,” and the background of the times in which individuals in the 2000s who cannot be the subject are being expressed. However, in reverse, it can also be read as a text that shows the danger that an individual in the impossibility of subjectivity in the 2000s can desire purity and unity and exclude and loathe “others.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信