哈耶克的复杂性

Q4 Social Sciences
Chaumont-Chancelier Frédérique
{"title":"哈耶克的复杂性","authors":"Chaumont-Chancelier Frédérique","doi":"10.2202/1145-6396.1173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Larticle cherche a contrer les critiques formulees a lencontre de la theorie evolutionnaire de Hayek en mettant en evidence les apports des theories de la complexite. Cela permet tout dabord de comprendre que la methode de Hayek nest pas un holisme mais un anti-reductionnisme. Cette methode est constante chez lauteur, que ce soit dans son approche du marche ou de levolution culturelle : il ny aurait donc aucune incoherence dans sa pensee.De surcroit, la prise en compte de lignorance individuelle comme des phenomenes demergence ne permet plus dutiliser la theorie des jeux pour corroborer ou refuter les explications dites de main-invisible . La theorie de levolution culturelle aurait donc une plus grande portee descriptive que celle qui lui est generalement conferee.This paper tries to respond to criticisms raised against Hayeks evolutionary theory by highlighting the salient features of theories of complexity. This allows us first to understand that Hayeks method is not holistic but anti-reductionist. This method permeates Hayeks whole oeuvre, whether it be his theory of the market or his ideas about cultural evolution. Hence, there is no inconsistency in his thought. Furthermore, taking individual ignorance and the phenomena of emergence into account no long allows us to use game theory in order to corroborate or refute invisible hand explanations. The theory of cultural evolution would hence have a greater scope than that traditionally acknowledged.","PeriodicalId":53483,"journal":{"name":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","volume":"39 1","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hayek's Complexity\",\"authors\":\"Chaumont-Chancelier Frédérique\",\"doi\":\"10.2202/1145-6396.1173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Larticle cherche a contrer les critiques formulees a lencontre de la theorie evolutionnaire de Hayek en mettant en evidence les apports des theories de la complexite. Cela permet tout dabord de comprendre que la methode de Hayek nest pas un holisme mais un anti-reductionnisme. Cette methode est constante chez lauteur, que ce soit dans son approche du marche ou de levolution culturelle : il ny aurait donc aucune incoherence dans sa pensee.De surcroit, la prise en compte de lignorance individuelle comme des phenomenes demergence ne permet plus dutiliser la theorie des jeux pour corroborer ou refuter les explications dites de main-invisible . La theorie de levolution culturelle aurait donc une plus grande portee descriptive que celle qui lui est generalement conferee.This paper tries to respond to criticisms raised against Hayeks evolutionary theory by highlighting the salient features of theories of complexity. This allows us first to understand that Hayeks method is not holistic but anti-reductionist. This method permeates Hayeks whole oeuvre, whether it be his theory of the market or his ideas about cultural evolution. Hence, there is no inconsistency in his thought. Furthermore, taking individual ignorance and the phenomena of emergence into account no long allows us to use game theory in order to corroborate or refute invisible hand explanations. The theory of cultural evolution would hence have a greater scope than that traditionally acknowledged.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"1-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

这篇文章试图通过强调复杂性理论的贡献来反驳对哈耶克进化论的批评。这让我们首先理解哈耶克的方法不是整体主义,而是反还原论。这种方法对lauteur来说是不变的,无论是在他对市场的态度上,还是在他对文化发展的态度上:因此,他的思想没有矛盾。此外,将个人优势作为差异现象加以考虑,不再允许使用博弈论来证实或驳斥所谓的看不见的手的解释。因此,文化进化理论将具有比通常赋予它的更大的描述性范围。This paper选种to respond to之间权利,against Hayeks游戏理论》by the salient highlighting features of theories of复杂性。这让我们首先理解海耶克的方法不是整体的,而是反简化主义的。这个方法permeates Hayeks it be如果腿”,作品的儿子theory of the market黄金his ideas about文化的进化。所以,在思想上没有矛盾。此外,证明一个人的无知和失败的过程中涌现的phenomena》no long相称的us to use game theory in order to hand corroborate专家才能隐身黄金不会解释。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,这个县的面积为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hayek's Complexity
Larticle cherche a contrer les critiques formulees a lencontre de la theorie evolutionnaire de Hayek en mettant en evidence les apports des theories de la complexite. Cela permet tout dabord de comprendre que la methode de Hayek nest pas un holisme mais un anti-reductionnisme. Cette methode est constante chez lauteur, que ce soit dans son approche du marche ou de levolution culturelle : il ny aurait donc aucune incoherence dans sa pensee.De surcroit, la prise en compte de lignorance individuelle comme des phenomenes demergence ne permet plus dutiliser la theorie des jeux pour corroborer ou refuter les explications dites de main-invisible . La theorie de levolution culturelle aurait donc une plus grande portee descriptive que celle qui lui est generalement conferee.This paper tries to respond to criticisms raised against Hayeks evolutionary theory by highlighting the salient features of theories of complexity. This allows us first to understand that Hayeks method is not holistic but anti-reductionist. This method permeates Hayeks whole oeuvre, whether it be his theory of the market or his ideas about cultural evolution. Hence, there is no inconsistency in his thought. Furthermore, taking individual ignorance and the phenomena of emergence into account no long allows us to use game theory in order to corroborate or refute invisible hand explanations. The theory of cultural evolution would hence have a greater scope than that traditionally acknowledged.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines
Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines (JEEH) is a journal of political economy and interdisciplinary economic studies. It addresses economic issues in political theory, social dynamics, social science methodology, and philosophy. Today, JEEH has an international audience, and welcomes contributions written by scholars from around the world. JEEH''s goals are: -To bring together economics with neighboring disciplines such as law, history, political science, sociology, philosophy, psychology, and anthropology -To promote the development of the Austrian approach to economics (Austrian School) and to provide discussion and controversy -To reconcile economics with the ethical and policy-oriented principles which make coordinated interaction between human beings possible
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信