谁参与绿色基础设施倡议?为什么?比较费城GI项目的参与者和非参与者

IF 2.9 3区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Tenley M. Conway, A. Yuan, Lara A. Roman, Megan Heckert, H. Pearsall, Stephen T. Dickinson, Christina Rosan, Camilo Ordóñez
{"title":"谁参与绿色基础设施倡议?为什么?比较费城GI项目的参与者和非参与者","authors":"Tenley M. Conway, A. Yuan, Lara A. Roman, Megan Heckert, H. Pearsall, Stephen T. Dickinson, Christina Rosan, Camilo Ordóñez","doi":"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2128310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Green infrastructure (GI) refers to trees, rain gardens, rain barrels, and other features that address stormwater management, climate change and other challenges facing many cities. GI is often not equitably distributed across urban landscapes, making its benefits unevenly experienced. Cities have multiple initiatives focused on different types of GI in residential areas, including underserved neighborhoods, although there is potential for GI programs to serve more privileged neighborhoods. The goal of this study was to examine GI program participants and non-participants to better understand who participates in different types of residential GI programs and why. We surveyed residents who had previously participated in Philadelphia’s GI programs as well as those who had not, comparing socio-demographics, knowledge-levels, environmental concerns, outdoor space preferences, motivations and barriers. We found that the GI program participants are on average younger, wealthier, more highly educated, and more likely to be White than our sample of residents who have not participated. Participants in tree programs have different socio-demographics and motivations as compared to those who installed green stormwater infrastructure. Future research should examine strategies to reach neighborhoods with different socioeconomic conditions and built environment characteristics, such as offering features appropriate for small properties with limited plantable space.","PeriodicalId":15699,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","volume":"38 1","pages":"327 - 341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who participates in green infrastructure initiatives and why? Comparing participants and non-participants in Philadelphia’s GI programs\",\"authors\":\"Tenley M. Conway, A. Yuan, Lara A. Roman, Megan Heckert, H. Pearsall, Stephen T. Dickinson, Christina Rosan, Camilo Ordóñez\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1523908X.2022.2128310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Green infrastructure (GI) refers to trees, rain gardens, rain barrels, and other features that address stormwater management, climate change and other challenges facing many cities. GI is often not equitably distributed across urban landscapes, making its benefits unevenly experienced. Cities have multiple initiatives focused on different types of GI in residential areas, including underserved neighborhoods, although there is potential for GI programs to serve more privileged neighborhoods. The goal of this study was to examine GI program participants and non-participants to better understand who participates in different types of residential GI programs and why. We surveyed residents who had previously participated in Philadelphia’s GI programs as well as those who had not, comparing socio-demographics, knowledge-levels, environmental concerns, outdoor space preferences, motivations and barriers. We found that the GI program participants are on average younger, wealthier, more highly educated, and more likely to be White than our sample of residents who have not participated. Participants in tree programs have different socio-demographics and motivations as compared to those who installed green stormwater infrastructure. Future research should examine strategies to reach neighborhoods with different socioeconomic conditions and built environment characteristics, such as offering features appropriate for small properties with limited plantable space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"327 - 341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2128310\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2128310","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

绿色基础设施(GI)是指树木、雨水花园、雨水桶和其他解决雨水管理、气候变化和许多城市面临的其他挑战的设施。地理标志在城市景观中的分布往往不公平,使其带来的好处不均衡。各个城市都有针对居民区不同类型GI的多项举措,包括服务不足的社区,尽管GI项目也有可能服务于更优越的社区。本研究的目的是检查GI项目的参与者和非参与者,以更好地了解谁参与了不同类型的住宅GI项目及其原因。我们调查了以前参加过费城地理标志项目的居民和没有参加过的居民,比较了社会人口统计学、知识水平、环境问题、户外空间偏好、动机和障碍。我们发现,GI项目的参与者平均更年轻、更富有、受教育程度更高,而且与没有参加过GI项目的居民相比,他们更有可能是白人。与那些安装绿色雨水基础设施的人相比,植树项目的参与者有着不同的社会人口特征和动机。未来的研究应该研究如何达到具有不同社会经济条件和建筑环境特征的社区,例如提供适合种植空间有限的小型物业的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who participates in green infrastructure initiatives and why? Comparing participants and non-participants in Philadelphia’s GI programs
ABSTRACT Green infrastructure (GI) refers to trees, rain gardens, rain barrels, and other features that address stormwater management, climate change and other challenges facing many cities. GI is often not equitably distributed across urban landscapes, making its benefits unevenly experienced. Cities have multiple initiatives focused on different types of GI in residential areas, including underserved neighborhoods, although there is potential for GI programs to serve more privileged neighborhoods. The goal of this study was to examine GI program participants and non-participants to better understand who participates in different types of residential GI programs and why. We surveyed residents who had previously participated in Philadelphia’s GI programs as well as those who had not, comparing socio-demographics, knowledge-levels, environmental concerns, outdoor space preferences, motivations and barriers. We found that the GI program participants are on average younger, wealthier, more highly educated, and more likely to be White than our sample of residents who have not participated. Participants in tree programs have different socio-demographics and motivations as compared to those who installed green stormwater infrastructure. Future research should examine strategies to reach neighborhoods with different socioeconomic conditions and built environment characteristics, such as offering features appropriate for small properties with limited plantable space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信