条件知识和调试策略有助于克服创造性努力的成本:我们能否将成功创新者的策略用于创新教育?

Eleftherios K. Soleas
{"title":"条件知识和调试策略有助于克服创造性努力的成本:我们能否将成功创新者的策略用于创新教育?","authors":"Eleftherios K. Soleas","doi":"10.1016/j.yjoc.2022.100028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Given that society depends on a steady supply of innovators to overcome challenges, innovation education efforts must be amplified to promote innovation skills among students. A key aspect of promoting innovation in context is understanding how and why innovators are motivated to innovate. However, even in the limited emerging literature on motivating innovation, there is a paucity of information on established innovators’ motivations for innovating. This two-phase, primarily qualitative study addresses this knowledge gap by investigating the strategies that innovators used to make their creative endeavours more likely, combining semi-structured interviews and a survey of Canadian innovators. Interviews were conducted with a diverse, multidisciplinary sample of 30 Canadian innovators which informed the development of the survey administered to a larger sample of 500 Canadian innovators. Participants reported costs of innovating and from their perspectives offered advice for aspiring innovators. Specifically, innovators detailed advice and approaches for aspiring innovators to maximize expectancies, maximize values, and proactively mitigate costs. This study calls for innovation education to focus on building capacity for developing innovators based on the strategies of successful innovators. These promotive and mitigating strategies are useful guides for educators, leaders, and of course for innovators themselves. Study results direct attention to approaches that should be integrated into programs designed to promote innovation across disciplines, organizations, and learning contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creativity","volume":"32 2","pages":"Article 100028"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2713374522000115/pdfft?md5=c4e2343732fc981a3f8c070383ab6ae8&pid=1-s2.0-S2713374522000115-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conditional knowledge and debugging strategies help overcome creative endeavours’ costs: Can we use successful innovators’ tactics for innovation education?\",\"authors\":\"Eleftherios K. Soleas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yjoc.2022.100028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Given that society depends on a steady supply of innovators to overcome challenges, innovation education efforts must be amplified to promote innovation skills among students. A key aspect of promoting innovation in context is understanding how and why innovators are motivated to innovate. However, even in the limited emerging literature on motivating innovation, there is a paucity of information on established innovators’ motivations for innovating. This two-phase, primarily qualitative study addresses this knowledge gap by investigating the strategies that innovators used to make their creative endeavours more likely, combining semi-structured interviews and a survey of Canadian innovators. Interviews were conducted with a diverse, multidisciplinary sample of 30 Canadian innovators which informed the development of the survey administered to a larger sample of 500 Canadian innovators. Participants reported costs of innovating and from their perspectives offered advice for aspiring innovators. Specifically, innovators detailed advice and approaches for aspiring innovators to maximize expectancies, maximize values, and proactively mitigate costs. This study calls for innovation education to focus on building capacity for developing innovators based on the strategies of successful innovators. These promotive and mitigating strategies are useful guides for educators, leaders, and of course for innovators themselves. Study results direct attention to approaches that should be integrated into programs designed to promote innovation across disciplines, organizations, and learning contexts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Creativity\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100028\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2713374522000115/pdfft?md5=c4e2343732fc981a3f8c070383ab6ae8&pid=1-s2.0-S2713374522000115-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Creativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2713374522000115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2713374522000115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于社会依靠稳定的创新者供应来克服挑战,必须加大创新教育的力度,以提高学生的创新技能。促进创新的一个关键方面是理解创新者是如何以及为什么被激励去创新的。然而,即使在有限的关于激励创新的新兴文献中,也缺乏关于已建立的创新者创新动机的信息。本研究分为两个阶段,主要是定性研究,结合半结构化访谈和对加拿大创新者的调查,通过调查创新者用来提高创造性努力的策略来解决这一知识差距。对30名加拿大创新者进行了不同的、多学科的访谈,这些样本为调查的发展提供了信息,调查对象是500名加拿大创新者。参与者报告了创新的成本,并从他们的角度为有抱负的创新者提供了建议。具体来说,创新者为有抱负的创新者提供了详细的建议和方法,以最大化期望,最大化价值,并主动降低成本。创新教育应以成功创新者的战略为基础,注重培养创新者的能力。这些促进和缓解策略对教育者、领导者,当然对创新者本身都是有用的指南。研究结果直接关注应该整合到旨在促进跨学科、组织和学习环境创新的项目中的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conditional knowledge and debugging strategies help overcome creative endeavours’ costs: Can we use successful innovators’ tactics for innovation education?

Given that society depends on a steady supply of innovators to overcome challenges, innovation education efforts must be amplified to promote innovation skills among students. A key aspect of promoting innovation in context is understanding how and why innovators are motivated to innovate. However, even in the limited emerging literature on motivating innovation, there is a paucity of information on established innovators’ motivations for innovating. This two-phase, primarily qualitative study addresses this knowledge gap by investigating the strategies that innovators used to make their creative endeavours more likely, combining semi-structured interviews and a survey of Canadian innovators. Interviews were conducted with a diverse, multidisciplinary sample of 30 Canadian innovators which informed the development of the survey administered to a larger sample of 500 Canadian innovators. Participants reported costs of innovating and from their perspectives offered advice for aspiring innovators. Specifically, innovators detailed advice and approaches for aspiring innovators to maximize expectancies, maximize values, and proactively mitigate costs. This study calls for innovation education to focus on building capacity for developing innovators based on the strategies of successful innovators. These promotive and mitigating strategies are useful guides for educators, leaders, and of course for innovators themselves. Study results direct attention to approaches that should be integrated into programs designed to promote innovation across disciplines, organizations, and learning contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信