微波和高压锅两种抗原提取技术对乳腺癌组织中雌激素和孕激素受体免疫表达的比较分析

Ramandeep Kaur, P. Somal, S. Sancheti
{"title":"微波和高压锅两种抗原提取技术对乳腺癌组织中雌激素和孕激素受体免疫表达的比较分析","authors":"Ramandeep Kaur, P. Somal, S. Sancheti","doi":"10.25259/ijms_300_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nAntigen retrieval (AR) is an important step in Immunohistochemistry (IHC) which is used to unmask the antigenic sites and facilitate antigen-antibody binding. Adequate fixation of tissue is necessary to achieve consistent demonstration of tissue antigens that can be masked by the chemical process involved in formalin fixation and tissue processing. Out of the various methods of AR, heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) methods have greatly improved the quality and reproducibility of IHC. In this study, a comparison of the two most commonly used HIER methods-pressure cooker and microwave oven was done on thirty cases of breast carcinoma.\n\n\n\nAppropriate tumor sections were taken and subjected to manual IHC testing for estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) receptors in each case. The results were divided into technique and microscopy-based. The parameters assessed on microscopy were uniformity of nuclear staining, quality of nuclear staining, internal control staining, presence of background staining, and Allred score. The sensitivity and specificity and positive and negative predictive values for each method were calculated.\n\n\n\nThe parameters assessed on microscopy were comparable for both methods. Using a microwave oven, the sensitivity and specificity for ER and PR were 94% and 100%, respectively. Using a pressure cooker, the sensitivity, and specificity for ER were 94% and 100%, respectively, and for PR were 88% and 100%, respectively. On technical aspects, the pressure cooker method offers the advantage of being more convenient due to the possibility of simultaneous handling of more slides and being more time efficient.\n\n\n\nBoth the AR methods had comparable results on microscopy. However, the pressure cooker has the benefit of being both time and money efficient from a technical standpoint.\n","PeriodicalId":13277,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of medical sciences","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of two antigen retrieval techniques: Microwave oven and pressure cooker for immunoexpression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer tissue\",\"authors\":\"Ramandeep Kaur, P. Somal, S. Sancheti\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/ijms_300_2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nAntigen retrieval (AR) is an important step in Immunohistochemistry (IHC) which is used to unmask the antigenic sites and facilitate antigen-antibody binding. Adequate fixation of tissue is necessary to achieve consistent demonstration of tissue antigens that can be masked by the chemical process involved in formalin fixation and tissue processing. Out of the various methods of AR, heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) methods have greatly improved the quality and reproducibility of IHC. In this study, a comparison of the two most commonly used HIER methods-pressure cooker and microwave oven was done on thirty cases of breast carcinoma.\\n\\n\\n\\nAppropriate tumor sections were taken and subjected to manual IHC testing for estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) receptors in each case. The results were divided into technique and microscopy-based. The parameters assessed on microscopy were uniformity of nuclear staining, quality of nuclear staining, internal control staining, presence of background staining, and Allred score. The sensitivity and specificity and positive and negative predictive values for each method were calculated.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe parameters assessed on microscopy were comparable for both methods. Using a microwave oven, the sensitivity and specificity for ER and PR were 94% and 100%, respectively. Using a pressure cooker, the sensitivity, and specificity for ER were 94% and 100%, respectively, and for PR were 88% and 100%, respectively. On technical aspects, the pressure cooker method offers the advantage of being more convenient due to the possibility of simultaneous handling of more slides and being more time efficient.\\n\\n\\n\\nBoth the AR methods had comparable results on microscopy. However, the pressure cooker has the benefit of being both time and money efficient from a technical standpoint.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":13277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian journal of medical sciences\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian journal of medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijms_300_2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijms_300_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗原检索(Antigen retrieval, AR)是免疫组化(Immunohistochemistry, IHC)的一个重要步骤,用于揭示抗原位点,促进抗原-抗体结合。充分的组织固定是必要的,以实现组织抗原的一致证明,这些抗原可以被福尔马林固定和组织处理中涉及的化学过程所掩盖。在各种AR方法中,热诱导表位检索(HIER)方法极大地提高了免疫组化的质量和可重复性。在这项研究中,比较了两种最常用的HIER方法-高压锅和微波炉对30例乳腺癌的影响。每个病例取适当的肿瘤切片,进行人工免疫组化检测雌激素受体(ER)和孕激素受体(PR)受体。结果分为基于技术和基于显微镜。镜检评估的参数为核染色均匀性、核染色质量、内控染色、背景染色和Allred评分。计算各方法的敏感性、特异性及阳性预测值和阴性预测值。两种方法在显微镜下评估的参数具有可比性。微波法测定ER和PR的敏感性和特异性分别为94%和100%。使用高压锅,ER的敏感性和特异性分别为94%和100%,PR的敏感性和特异性分别为88%和100%。在技术方面,压力锅方法提供了更方便的优点,因为可以同时处理更多的幻灯片,而且更省时。两种AR方法在显微镜上的结果相似。然而,从技术角度来看,压力锅的优点是既节省时间又节省金钱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative analysis of two antigen retrieval techniques: Microwave oven and pressure cooker for immunoexpression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer tissue
Antigen retrieval (AR) is an important step in Immunohistochemistry (IHC) which is used to unmask the antigenic sites and facilitate antigen-antibody binding. Adequate fixation of tissue is necessary to achieve consistent demonstration of tissue antigens that can be masked by the chemical process involved in formalin fixation and tissue processing. Out of the various methods of AR, heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) methods have greatly improved the quality and reproducibility of IHC. In this study, a comparison of the two most commonly used HIER methods-pressure cooker and microwave oven was done on thirty cases of breast carcinoma. Appropriate tumor sections were taken and subjected to manual IHC testing for estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) receptors in each case. The results were divided into technique and microscopy-based. The parameters assessed on microscopy were uniformity of nuclear staining, quality of nuclear staining, internal control staining, presence of background staining, and Allred score. The sensitivity and specificity and positive and negative predictive values for each method were calculated. The parameters assessed on microscopy were comparable for both methods. Using a microwave oven, the sensitivity and specificity for ER and PR were 94% and 100%, respectively. Using a pressure cooker, the sensitivity, and specificity for ER were 94% and 100%, respectively, and for PR were 88% and 100%, respectively. On technical aspects, the pressure cooker method offers the advantage of being more convenient due to the possibility of simultaneous handling of more slides and being more time efficient. Both the AR methods had comparable results on microscopy. However, the pressure cooker has the benefit of being both time and money efficient from a technical standpoint.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信