地高辛对原发性全身性癫痫基本模型的抗惊厥作用不依赖于给药途径

V. Tsyvunin, S. Shtrygol’, M. V. Mishchenko, D. Shtrygol’
{"title":"地高辛对原发性全身性癫痫基本模型的抗惊厥作用不依赖于给药途径","authors":"V. Tsyvunin, S. Shtrygol’, M. V. Mishchenko, D. Shtrygol’","doi":"10.24959/nphj.22.98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improving the prevention and treatment of epilepsy is one of the urgent tasks. Based on the available data on the anticonvulsant activity of the cardiac glycoside digoxin, it is advisable to compare the anticonvulsant effect of the drug by different routes of administration in the experiment.\nAim. To determine the impact of the route of administration on the anticonvulsant effect of the cardiac glycoside digoxin on basic models of primary generalized seizures induced by pentylenetetrazol and maximal electric shock.\nMaterials and methods. Two basic models were used: the model of primary generalized convulsions induced in mice by pentylenetetrazol (80 mg/kg subcutaneously) and maximal electric shock (current strength – 50 mA, frequency – 50 Hz, 0.2 sec corneally). Digoxin was administered in the dose of 0.8 mg/kg (about 1/10 LD50) 30 min before modeling seizures in the stomach and subcutaneously. Standard parameters of convulsive syndrome severity and mortality were recorded.\nResults and discussion. In both seizure models, the anticonvulsant effect of digoxin was little dependent on the route of administration. In the pentylenetetrazole-induced model, with both routes of administration, lethality tended to decrease; when administered intragastrically, digoxin statistically significantly reduced the number of clonic-tonic seizures per 1 mouse, the number of animals with the most severe tonic seizures, and the duration of the convulsive period; when administered subcutaneously, it significantly increased the latent period of seizures and reduced the number of animals with tonic seizures. In the model of maximal electric shock, digoxin reduced seizure severity andlethality almost equally by both routes of administration (by 55 % with the intragastric administration and by 67.5 % with the subcutaneous administration). In both models, there were no statistically significant differences in the course of seizures in both routes of the digoxin administration. With subcutaneous administration, the anticonvulsant effect was somewhat more pronounced at the level of a weak tendency.\nConclusions. The anticonvulsant effect of digoxin when administered intragastrically and subcutaneously in mice with models of pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures and maximal electric shock is practically independent of the routeof administration. Digoxin has a pronounced anticonvulsant effect on the model of electrically induced seizures, and a moderate effect on the model of pentylenetetrazole seizures.","PeriodicalId":19221,"journal":{"name":"News of Pharmacy","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The anticonvulsant effect of digoxin on basic models of primary generalized seizures does not depend on the route of administration\",\"authors\":\"V. Tsyvunin, S. Shtrygol’, M. V. Mishchenko, D. Shtrygol’\",\"doi\":\"10.24959/nphj.22.98\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Improving the prevention and treatment of epilepsy is one of the urgent tasks. Based on the available data on the anticonvulsant activity of the cardiac glycoside digoxin, it is advisable to compare the anticonvulsant effect of the drug by different routes of administration in the experiment.\\nAim. To determine the impact of the route of administration on the anticonvulsant effect of the cardiac glycoside digoxin on basic models of primary generalized seizures induced by pentylenetetrazol and maximal electric shock.\\nMaterials and methods. Two basic models were used: the model of primary generalized convulsions induced in mice by pentylenetetrazol (80 mg/kg subcutaneously) and maximal electric shock (current strength – 50 mA, frequency – 50 Hz, 0.2 sec corneally). Digoxin was administered in the dose of 0.8 mg/kg (about 1/10 LD50) 30 min before modeling seizures in the stomach and subcutaneously. Standard parameters of convulsive syndrome severity and mortality were recorded.\\nResults and discussion. In both seizure models, the anticonvulsant effect of digoxin was little dependent on the route of administration. In the pentylenetetrazole-induced model, with both routes of administration, lethality tended to decrease; when administered intragastrically, digoxin statistically significantly reduced the number of clonic-tonic seizures per 1 mouse, the number of animals with the most severe tonic seizures, and the duration of the convulsive period; when administered subcutaneously, it significantly increased the latent period of seizures and reduced the number of animals with tonic seizures. In the model of maximal electric shock, digoxin reduced seizure severity andlethality almost equally by both routes of administration (by 55 % with the intragastric administration and by 67.5 % with the subcutaneous administration). In both models, there were no statistically significant differences in the course of seizures in both routes of the digoxin administration. With subcutaneous administration, the anticonvulsant effect was somewhat more pronounced at the level of a weak tendency.\\nConclusions. The anticonvulsant effect of digoxin when administered intragastrically and subcutaneously in mice with models of pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures and maximal electric shock is practically independent of the routeof administration. Digoxin has a pronounced anticonvulsant effect on the model of electrically induced seizures, and a moderate effect on the model of pentylenetetrazole seizures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"News of Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"News of Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24959/nphj.22.98\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"News of Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24959/nphj.22.98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加强对癫痫的预防和治疗是当务之急。根据心脏糖苷地高辛抗惊厥活性的现有资料,在实验中比较不同给药途径对心脏糖苷地高辛的抗惊厥作用是可取的。目的探讨心糖苷地高辛给药方式对戊四唑和最大电击致原发性全发性癫痫基本模型抗惊厥作用的影响。材料和方法。采用两种基本模型:戊四唑(80 mg/kg皮下注射)致小鼠原发性全身惊厥模型和最大电击(电流强度- 50 mA,频率- 50 Hz,角膜0.2秒)模型。地高辛以0.8 mg/kg(约1/10 LD50)的剂量在模拟癫痫发作前30分钟胃内和皮下给药。记录惊厥综合征严重程度和死亡率的标准参数。结果和讨论。在两种癫痫模型中,地高辛的抗惊厥作用对给药途径的依赖性很小。在戊四唑致大鼠模型中,两种给药方式均有降低死亡率的趋势;地高辛灌胃后,每1只小鼠的阵挛性强直性癫痫发作次数、发生最严重强直性癫痫发作的动物数量和惊厥持续时间均显著减少;皮下给药时,显著增加癫痫发作潜伏期,减少强直性癫痫发作的动物数量。在最大电击模型中,地高辛在两种给药方式下降低癫痫发作的严重程度和死亡率几乎相同(胃内给药55%,皮下给药67.5%)。在两种模型中,地高辛两种给药方式在癫痫发作过程中没有统计学上的显著差异。皮下给药时,抗惊厥作用在弱倾向水平上更为明显。地高辛的抗惊厥作用在戊四唑诱导的癫痫发作和最大电击模型小鼠的胃内和皮下给药实际上与给药途径无关。地高辛对电致癫痫发作模型有明显的抗惊厥作用,对戊四唑癫痫发作模型有中等作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The anticonvulsant effect of digoxin on basic models of primary generalized seizures does not depend on the route of administration
Improving the prevention and treatment of epilepsy is one of the urgent tasks. Based on the available data on the anticonvulsant activity of the cardiac glycoside digoxin, it is advisable to compare the anticonvulsant effect of the drug by different routes of administration in the experiment. Aim. To determine the impact of the route of administration on the anticonvulsant effect of the cardiac glycoside digoxin on basic models of primary generalized seizures induced by pentylenetetrazol and maximal electric shock. Materials and methods. Two basic models were used: the model of primary generalized convulsions induced in mice by pentylenetetrazol (80 mg/kg subcutaneously) and maximal electric shock (current strength – 50 mA, frequency – 50 Hz, 0.2 sec corneally). Digoxin was administered in the dose of 0.8 mg/kg (about 1/10 LD50) 30 min before modeling seizures in the stomach and subcutaneously. Standard parameters of convulsive syndrome severity and mortality were recorded. Results and discussion. In both seizure models, the anticonvulsant effect of digoxin was little dependent on the route of administration. In the pentylenetetrazole-induced model, with both routes of administration, lethality tended to decrease; when administered intragastrically, digoxin statistically significantly reduced the number of clonic-tonic seizures per 1 mouse, the number of animals with the most severe tonic seizures, and the duration of the convulsive period; when administered subcutaneously, it significantly increased the latent period of seizures and reduced the number of animals with tonic seizures. In the model of maximal electric shock, digoxin reduced seizure severity andlethality almost equally by both routes of administration (by 55 % with the intragastric administration and by 67.5 % with the subcutaneous administration). In both models, there were no statistically significant differences in the course of seizures in both routes of the digoxin administration. With subcutaneous administration, the anticonvulsant effect was somewhat more pronounced at the level of a weak tendency. Conclusions. The anticonvulsant effect of digoxin when administered intragastrically and subcutaneously in mice with models of pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures and maximal electric shock is practically independent of the routeof administration. Digoxin has a pronounced anticonvulsant effect on the model of electrically induced seizures, and a moderate effect on the model of pentylenetetrazole seizures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信