DSDV、AOMDV和ZRP路由协议在北干巴鲁车载自组织网络(VANET)中的应用仿真性能分析

Ery Safrianti, L. O. Sari, F. Saputri
{"title":"DSDV、AOMDV和ZRP路由协议在北干巴鲁车载自组织网络(VANET)中的应用仿真性能分析","authors":"Ery Safrianti, L. O. Sari, F. Saputri","doi":"10.17933/bpostel.2020.180204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction 1. The 2018 data obtained from the Riau Province Revenue Agency indicated that the total number of 4-wheeled vehicles registered in the Pekanbaru city is 181,748. This high number of vehicles causes several traffic problems, such as increased number of accidents and congestion. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a communication technology capable of providing vehicle traffic information such as the Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET). Over the last few years, various wireless technological devices that provide communication between vehicles have been developed. VANET is one of such technologies developed with Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) for vehicles to communicate with each other (Pradana et al., 2017). This device enables each car to receive information related to traffic conditions and travel conditions, using nodes, which form an Ad hoc network called the Vehicular Ad hoc Network (VANET) (Dimyati et al., 2016). The fundamental objective of this research on VANET is to develop a vehicle communication system that allows fast and efficient data exchange that is used as an intelligent traffic information system (Pradana et al., 2017). Although VANET is very helpful for traffic information systems, the construction of VANET systems infrastructure is not easy because it requires high cost in its development and testing. In order that research on VANET can be continued, VANET network modeling is carried out in the form of simulation (Nutrihadi, 2016). The advantage of doing the simulation beforehand is the flexibility to model and evaluate the design without building a physical network. The simulation results are expected to provide the foundations to allow the actual implementation of the technology in Indonesia, especially in Pekanbaru. VANET has a routing protocol that functions to determine the route according to its characteristics. According to Virgono and Yovita (2016) routing protocols are very influential on network performance and Buletin Pos dan Telekomunikasi Vol. 18 No.2 (2020): 127-144 128 are used to face challenges related to dynamic network topology. This study is conducted to simulate the maximum performance comparison of proactive, reactive and hybrid types of DSDV, AOMDV, and ZRP routing protocols. Data is collected through direct method by counting the number of vehicles passing several protocol roads. The obtained data are simulated on software with variations in the transmission distance range to improve the reliability of the routing path used and create a more extended connection between vehicles. The scenario is carried out in conditions of network changes and breakneck node speeds. The VANET network provides driving safety information, so a fast and efficient routing protocol is needed. VANET Network performance is measured by the Quality of Service (QoS) parameter, because QoS describes the measurement of the ability of a network to achieve maximum performance determined by parameters such as end-to-end delay, packet delivery ratio, routing overhead, throughput, collision rate, and packet loss obtained using the AWK script. The data obtained is compared in graphical form. The contribution of this research is to produce recommendations for a VANET network model in Pekanbaru City that implements DSDV, AOMDV, and ZRP as its routing protocols, using several parameters such as end to end delay, packet delivery ratio, and routing overhead, collision rate and packet loss. The research results are expected to be used as a reference in implementing the VANET network in Pekanbaru. Literature review 2. 2.1. Vehicular Ad-hoc Network (VANET) Vehicular Ad hoc Network is the development of a wireless and Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET), which considers all vehicles in the system as nodes capable of communicating with other cars on specific scopes. Furthermore, the moving nodes on MANET and VANET depend on ad hoc routing protocols to determine the technique required to send messages from the source to the destination node (Arditya et al., 2017) The communication methods on VANETs are categorized into two types, namely those carried out between vehicles equipped with communication equipment known as Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) and communication between vehicles and infrastructure placed at the curb called Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) as shown in Figure 1. Furthermore, the devices placed by the sides of the road to support communication between vehicles are called Roadside Units (RSU). Meanwhile, the two central systems that support the VANETs besides RSU are called On-Board Unit (OBU) and Application Unit (AU)(Dimyati et al., 2016). Figure 1. Types of communication on VANET (Rehman et al., 2013) Due to the unavailability of a static topology by VANET, data is relayed between the source and destination nodes. Therefore, a routing algorithm is required to determine the path needed to send data on a dynamic topology. This led to the development of several routing algorithms on VANET with various advantages. These routing protocols are categorized into five categories, namely position-based, topologybased, broadcast-based, cluster-based, and geocast-based routing protocols as shown in Figure 2. Performance Analysis of DSDV, AOMDV, and ZRP Routing Protocols Application Simulation ... (Ery Safrianti, Linna O. Sari, Fitriani Saputri) 129 Topology-based routing protocols use routing tables to store link information as a basis for packet forwarding from the source to the destination node. Based on network architecture, this protocol is categorized into three types, namely Proactive, Reactive, and Hybrid protocols (Pradana et al., 2017). Figure 2. Routing protocols on VANET (Pradana et al., 2017) a) Proactive Routing Protocol The advantage of a proactive routing protocol is that it does not require route discovery because the destination route has been previously saved. Example: FSR, OLSR, DSDV. b) Reactive Routing Protocol The advantage of the reactive routing protocol is that the route search is performed when communication is needed by the node. It consists of the Route Discovery phase, where the requested packet floods the network to determine the path. Example: AODV, DSR, JARR, TORA, AOMDV c) Hybrid Routing Protocol Hybrid Routing Protocol was introduced to reduce overhead control and the initial delay in the route discovery process in the proactive routing protocol. Example: ZRP, HARP, HAODV. DSDV DSDV is an ad hoc proactive routing protocol algorithm, which uses a distance vector routing method equipped with a sequence number. This method allows each node in the network to exchange routing tables through neighboring nodes (Febrian et al., 2018). AOMDV AOMDV is a reactive routing protocol that develops from the AODV uni-path routing protocol to minimize frequent connection failures and interrupted routes. Similar to other routing protocols, it also provides two primary services, namely route discovery and maintenance. AOMDV is vector based and uses a hop-by-hop approach. Furthermore, it only searches for needed routes using the route discovery procedure (Anisia et al., 2016). ZRP The ZRP concept on the network is the building zone of each node that allows for several zone construction. According to (Adiwicaksono, 2017), the nodes within a predetermined geographic area is also known as the radius. 2.2. Network Simulator NS-2 is a network simulation software with a simple script language developed using two programming languages , namely C ++ and TCL (Shiddi Qi et al., 2017). 2.3. Simulation of Urban Mobility (SUMO) SUMO is one of the tools for mobility generators used for VANET simulations. It is an open-source microscopic traffic simulation package designed to handle networks with broad channels (Pradana et al., 2017). Buletin Pos dan Telekomunikasi Vol. 18 No.2 (2020): 127-144 130 2.4. Open Street Map (OSM) OpenStreetMap (OSM) is a web-based project used to create a free and open map of the world, built entirely by volunteers by conducting surveys using GPS devices, digitizing satellite imagery, and collecting and freeing geographical data that is publicly available. 2.5. AWK AWK is a programming language used to manipulate data and make reports. It can also be used in the command line and script by sequentially scanning the line standard input, file, or output processe(AM et al., 2019). 2.6. Network Performance Parameters Network performance is measured by the quality of service (QoS) parameter. It can show consistency, the success rate of sending data, etc. Several parameters can be used to measure network performance, namely, packet delivery ratio (PDR), end to end delay (E2E), overhead routing (RO), throughput, collision rate, and packet loss (AM et al., 2019) 1. Packet delivery ratio (PDR) Packet delivery ratio is the ratio between the number of packets received by the destination and the number of packets sent by the source. Packet Delivery Ratio is calculated with equation 1, where received is the number of data packets received and sent is the number of data packets sent. PDR = received sent x100% .................................................................................................................. (1) Packet Delivery Ratio may indicate the success of the package sent. The higher the Packet Delivery Ratio, the more successful the package delivery is (Ovari, 2017). ITU-T G.114 recommends that the value for the quality of service (QoS) in the packet delivery ratio (PDR) is 100% in VANET (vehicular ad hoc network) communications with this value, the routing protocol can work properly. 2. End to End Delay (E2E) E2E is calculated from the average delay between the time the packet was received and when it was sent as shown in equation (2), where treceived [i] is the time of receiving the packet with the order / id ith, tsent [i] is the time when the packet is sent with the order / id-i, and sent is the number of data packets sent. E2E = ∑ treceived sent i=0 −tsent[i] sent ......","PeriodicalId":30954,"journal":{"name":"Buletin Pos dan Telekomunikasi Media Komunikasi Ilmiah","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Analysis Of DSDV, AOMDV and ZRP Routing Protocols Application Simulation In Pekanbaru Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET)\",\"authors\":\"Ery Safrianti, L. O. Sari, F. Saputri\",\"doi\":\"10.17933/bpostel.2020.180204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction 1. The 2018 data obtained from the Riau Province Revenue Agency indicated that the total number of 4-wheeled vehicles registered in the Pekanbaru city is 181,748. This high number of vehicles causes several traffic problems, such as increased number of accidents and congestion. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a communication technology capable of providing vehicle traffic information such as the Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET). Over the last few years, various wireless technological devices that provide communication between vehicles have been developed. VANET is one of such technologies developed with Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) for vehicles to communicate with each other (Pradana et al., 2017). This device enables each car to receive information related to traffic conditions and travel conditions, using nodes, which form an Ad hoc network called the Vehicular Ad hoc Network (VANET) (Dimyati et al., 2016). The fundamental objective of this research on VANET is to develop a vehicle communication system that allows fast and efficient data exchange that is used as an intelligent traffic information system (Pradana et al., 2017). Although VANET is very helpful for traffic information systems, the construction of VANET systems infrastructure is not easy because it requires high cost in its development and testing. In order that research on VANET can be continued, VANET network modeling is carried out in the form of simulation (Nutrihadi, 2016). The advantage of doing the simulation beforehand is the flexibility to model and evaluate the design without building a physical network. The simulation results are expected to provide the foundations to allow the actual implementation of the technology in Indonesia, especially in Pekanbaru. VANET has a routing protocol that functions to determine the route according to its characteristics. According to Virgono and Yovita (2016) routing protocols are very influential on network performance and Buletin Pos dan Telekomunikasi Vol. 18 No.2 (2020): 127-144 128 are used to face challenges related to dynamic network topology. This study is conducted to simulate the maximum performance comparison of proactive, reactive and hybrid types of DSDV, AOMDV, and ZRP routing protocols. Data is collected through direct method by counting the number of vehicles passing several protocol roads. The obtained data are simulated on software with variations in the transmission distance range to improve the reliability of the routing path used and create a more extended connection between vehicles. The scenario is carried out in conditions of network changes and breakneck node speeds. The VANET network provides driving safety information, so a fast and efficient routing protocol is needed. VANET Network performance is measured by the Quality of Service (QoS) parameter, because QoS describes the measurement of the ability of a network to achieve maximum performance determined by parameters such as end-to-end delay, packet delivery ratio, routing overhead, throughput, collision rate, and packet loss obtained using the AWK script. The data obtained is compared in graphical form. The contribution of this research is to produce recommendations for a VANET network model in Pekanbaru City that implements DSDV, AOMDV, and ZRP as its routing protocols, using several parameters such as end to end delay, packet delivery ratio, and routing overhead, collision rate and packet loss. The research results are expected to be used as a reference in implementing the VANET network in Pekanbaru. Literature review 2. 2.1. Vehicular Ad-hoc Network (VANET) Vehicular Ad hoc Network is the development of a wireless and Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET), which considers all vehicles in the system as nodes capable of communicating with other cars on specific scopes. Furthermore, the moving nodes on MANET and VANET depend on ad hoc routing protocols to determine the technique required to send messages from the source to the destination node (Arditya et al., 2017) The communication methods on VANETs are categorized into two types, namely those carried out between vehicles equipped with communication equipment known as Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) and communication between vehicles and infrastructure placed at the curb called Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) as shown in Figure 1. Furthermore, the devices placed by the sides of the road to support communication between vehicles are called Roadside Units (RSU). Meanwhile, the two central systems that support the VANETs besides RSU are called On-Board Unit (OBU) and Application Unit (AU)(Dimyati et al., 2016). Figure 1. Types of communication on VANET (Rehman et al., 2013) Due to the unavailability of a static topology by VANET, data is relayed between the source and destination nodes. Therefore, a routing algorithm is required to determine the path needed to send data on a dynamic topology. This led to the development of several routing algorithms on VANET with various advantages. These routing protocols are categorized into five categories, namely position-based, topologybased, broadcast-based, cluster-based, and geocast-based routing protocols as shown in Figure 2. Performance Analysis of DSDV, AOMDV, and ZRP Routing Protocols Application Simulation ... (Ery Safrianti, Linna O. Sari, Fitriani Saputri) 129 Topology-based routing protocols use routing tables to store link information as a basis for packet forwarding from the source to the destination node. Based on network architecture, this protocol is categorized into three types, namely Proactive, Reactive, and Hybrid protocols (Pradana et al., 2017). Figure 2. Routing protocols on VANET (Pradana et al., 2017) a) Proactive Routing Protocol The advantage of a proactive routing protocol is that it does not require route discovery because the destination route has been previously saved. Example: FSR, OLSR, DSDV. b) Reactive Routing Protocol The advantage of the reactive routing protocol is that the route search is performed when communication is needed by the node. It consists of the Route Discovery phase, where the requested packet floods the network to determine the path. Example: AODV, DSR, JARR, TORA, AOMDV c) Hybrid Routing Protocol Hybrid Routing Protocol was introduced to reduce overhead control and the initial delay in the route discovery process in the proactive routing protocol. Example: ZRP, HARP, HAODV. DSDV DSDV is an ad hoc proactive routing protocol algorithm, which uses a distance vector routing method equipped with a sequence number. This method allows each node in the network to exchange routing tables through neighboring nodes (Febrian et al., 2018). AOMDV AOMDV is a reactive routing protocol that develops from the AODV uni-path routing protocol to minimize frequent connection failures and interrupted routes. Similar to other routing protocols, it also provides two primary services, namely route discovery and maintenance. AOMDV is vector based and uses a hop-by-hop approach. Furthermore, it only searches for needed routes using the route discovery procedure (Anisia et al., 2016). ZRP The ZRP concept on the network is the building zone of each node that allows for several zone construction. According to (Adiwicaksono, 2017), the nodes within a predetermined geographic area is also known as the radius. 2.2. Network Simulator NS-2 is a network simulation software with a simple script language developed using two programming languages , namely C ++ and TCL (Shiddi Qi et al., 2017). 2.3. Simulation of Urban Mobility (SUMO) SUMO is one of the tools for mobility generators used for VANET simulations. It is an open-source microscopic traffic simulation package designed to handle networks with broad channels (Pradana et al., 2017). Buletin Pos dan Telekomunikasi Vol. 18 No.2 (2020): 127-144 130 2.4. Open Street Map (OSM) OpenStreetMap (OSM) is a web-based project used to create a free and open map of the world, built entirely by volunteers by conducting surveys using GPS devices, digitizing satellite imagery, and collecting and freeing geographical data that is publicly available. 2.5. AWK AWK is a programming language used to manipulate data and make reports. It can also be used in the command line and script by sequentially scanning the line standard input, file, or output processe(AM et al., 2019). 2.6. Network Performance Parameters Network performance is measured by the quality of service (QoS) parameter. It can show consistency, the success rate of sending data, etc. Several parameters can be used to measure network performance, namely, packet delivery ratio (PDR), end to end delay (E2E), overhead routing (RO), throughput, collision rate, and packet loss (AM et al., 2019) 1. Packet delivery ratio (PDR) Packet delivery ratio is the ratio between the number of packets received by the destination and the number of packets sent by the source. Packet Delivery Ratio is calculated with equation 1, where received is the number of data packets received and sent is the number of data packets sent. PDR = received sent x100% .................................................................................................................. (1) Packet Delivery Ratio may indicate the success of the package sent. The higher the Packet Delivery Ratio, the more successful the package delivery is (Ovari, 2017). ITU-T G.114 recommends that the value for the quality of service (QoS) in the packet delivery ratio (PDR) is 100% in VANET (vehicular ad hoc network) communications with this value, the routing protocol can work properly. 2. End to End Delay (E2E) E2E is calculated from the average delay between the time the packet was received and when it was sent as shown in equation (2), where treceived [i] is the time of receiving the packet with the order / id ith, tsent [i] is the time when the packet is sent with the order / id-i, and sent is the number of data packets sent. E2E = ∑ treceived sent i=0 −tsent[i] sent ......\",\"PeriodicalId\":30954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Buletin Pos dan Telekomunikasi Media Komunikasi Ilmiah\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Buletin Pos dan Telekomunikasi Media Komunikasi Ilmiah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17933/bpostel.2020.180204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buletin Pos dan Telekomunikasi Media Komunikasi Ilmiah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17933/bpostel.2020.180204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这导致了在VANET上发展了几种具有不同优势的路由算法。这些路由协议分为五类,即基于位置的、基于拓扑的、基于广播的、基于集群的和基于地理播的路由协议,如图2所示。DSDV、AOMDV、ZRP路由协议性能分析应用仿真(Ery Safrianti, Linna O. Sari, Fitriani Saputri) 129基于拓扑的路由协议使用路由表来存储链路信息,作为数据包从源节点转发到目的节点的基础。根据网络架构,该协议分为三种类型,即主动协议,被动协议和混合协议(Pradana et al., 2017)。图2。VANET上的路由协议(Pradana et al., 2017) a)主动路由协议主动路由协议的优点是它不需要路由发现,因为目的路由之前已经保存。示例:FSR, OLSR, DSDV。b)响应路由协议响应路由协议的优点是当节点需要通信时才进行路由搜索。它由路由发现阶段组成,在此阶段,请求的数据包将在网络中传播以确定路径。例如:AODV, DSR, JARR, TORA, AOMDV c)混合路由协议混合路由协议是为了减少主动路由协议中开销控制和路由发现过程的初始延迟而引入的。例如:ZRP, HARP, HAODV。DSDV是一种自组织主动路由协议算法,它采用带有序列号的距离矢量路由方法。这种方法允许网络中的每个节点通过相邻节点交换路由表(Febrian et al., 2018)。AOMDV是在AODV单路径路由协议基础上发展而来的一种响应式路由协议,旨在最大限度地减少频繁的连接失败和路由中断。与其他路由协议类似,它也提供两种主要服务,即路由发现和路由维护。AOMDV是基于矢量的,使用逐跳方法。此外,它只使用路由发现过程搜索所需的路由(Anisia et al., 2016)。ZRP网络上的ZRP概念是每个节点的构建区域,允许多个区域的构建。根据(Adiwicaksono, 2017),预定地理区域内的节点也称为半径。2.2. Network Simulator NS-2是使用c++和TCL两种编程语言开发的简单脚本语言的网络仿真软件(Shiddi Qi et al., 2017)。2.3. 城市交通仿真(SUMO) SUMO是用于VANET仿真的交通生成器工具之一。它是一个开源的微观流量模拟包,旨在处理具有宽通道的网络(Pradana等人,2017)。通讯通讯,第18卷第2(2020):127-144 130 2.4。开放街道地图(OSM)是一个基于网络的项目,用于创建一个免费和开放的世界地图,完全由志愿者通过使用GPS设备进行调查,数字化卫星图像,收集和释放公开可用的地理数据来构建。2.5. AWK是一种用于操作数据和生成报告的编程语言。它也可以通过顺序扫描行标准输入、文件或输出过程在命令行和脚本中使用(AM等人,2019)。2.6. 网络性能参数通过QoS (quality of service)参数来衡量网络性能。它可以显示一致性,发送数据的成功率等。有几个参数可以用来衡量网络性能,即分组传送比(PDR)、端到端延迟(E2E)、开销路由(RO)、吞吐量、碰撞率和丢包(AM et al., 2019) 1。报文投递比(Packet delivery ratio, PDR)报文投递比是指目的端收到的报文数与源端发送的报文数之比。其中,接收为接收的数据包数,发送为发送的数据包数。PDR =收到了x100 % ..................................................................................................................(1)包发送率可以表示发送的包是否成功。包交付比越高,包交付越成功(Ovari, 2017)。ITU-T G.114建议在VANET(车载自组织网络)通信中,分组传送比(PDR)中的服务质量(QoS)值为100%,有了这个值,路由协议才能正常工作。2.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Analysis Of DSDV, AOMDV and ZRP Routing Protocols Application Simulation In Pekanbaru Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET)
Introduction 1. The 2018 data obtained from the Riau Province Revenue Agency indicated that the total number of 4-wheeled vehicles registered in the Pekanbaru city is 181,748. This high number of vehicles causes several traffic problems, such as increased number of accidents and congestion. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a communication technology capable of providing vehicle traffic information such as the Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET). Over the last few years, various wireless technological devices that provide communication between vehicles have been developed. VANET is one of such technologies developed with Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) for vehicles to communicate with each other (Pradana et al., 2017). This device enables each car to receive information related to traffic conditions and travel conditions, using nodes, which form an Ad hoc network called the Vehicular Ad hoc Network (VANET) (Dimyati et al., 2016). The fundamental objective of this research on VANET is to develop a vehicle communication system that allows fast and efficient data exchange that is used as an intelligent traffic information system (Pradana et al., 2017). Although VANET is very helpful for traffic information systems, the construction of VANET systems infrastructure is not easy because it requires high cost in its development and testing. In order that research on VANET can be continued, VANET network modeling is carried out in the form of simulation (Nutrihadi, 2016). The advantage of doing the simulation beforehand is the flexibility to model and evaluate the design without building a physical network. The simulation results are expected to provide the foundations to allow the actual implementation of the technology in Indonesia, especially in Pekanbaru. VANET has a routing protocol that functions to determine the route according to its characteristics. According to Virgono and Yovita (2016) routing protocols are very influential on network performance and Buletin Pos dan Telekomunikasi Vol. 18 No.2 (2020): 127-144 128 are used to face challenges related to dynamic network topology. This study is conducted to simulate the maximum performance comparison of proactive, reactive and hybrid types of DSDV, AOMDV, and ZRP routing protocols. Data is collected through direct method by counting the number of vehicles passing several protocol roads. The obtained data are simulated on software with variations in the transmission distance range to improve the reliability of the routing path used and create a more extended connection between vehicles. The scenario is carried out in conditions of network changes and breakneck node speeds. The VANET network provides driving safety information, so a fast and efficient routing protocol is needed. VANET Network performance is measured by the Quality of Service (QoS) parameter, because QoS describes the measurement of the ability of a network to achieve maximum performance determined by parameters such as end-to-end delay, packet delivery ratio, routing overhead, throughput, collision rate, and packet loss obtained using the AWK script. The data obtained is compared in graphical form. The contribution of this research is to produce recommendations for a VANET network model in Pekanbaru City that implements DSDV, AOMDV, and ZRP as its routing protocols, using several parameters such as end to end delay, packet delivery ratio, and routing overhead, collision rate and packet loss. The research results are expected to be used as a reference in implementing the VANET network in Pekanbaru. Literature review 2. 2.1. Vehicular Ad-hoc Network (VANET) Vehicular Ad hoc Network is the development of a wireless and Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET), which considers all vehicles in the system as nodes capable of communicating with other cars on specific scopes. Furthermore, the moving nodes on MANET and VANET depend on ad hoc routing protocols to determine the technique required to send messages from the source to the destination node (Arditya et al., 2017) The communication methods on VANETs are categorized into two types, namely those carried out between vehicles equipped with communication equipment known as Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) and communication between vehicles and infrastructure placed at the curb called Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) as shown in Figure 1. Furthermore, the devices placed by the sides of the road to support communication between vehicles are called Roadside Units (RSU). Meanwhile, the two central systems that support the VANETs besides RSU are called On-Board Unit (OBU) and Application Unit (AU)(Dimyati et al., 2016). Figure 1. Types of communication on VANET (Rehman et al., 2013) Due to the unavailability of a static topology by VANET, data is relayed between the source and destination nodes. Therefore, a routing algorithm is required to determine the path needed to send data on a dynamic topology. This led to the development of several routing algorithms on VANET with various advantages. These routing protocols are categorized into five categories, namely position-based, topologybased, broadcast-based, cluster-based, and geocast-based routing protocols as shown in Figure 2. Performance Analysis of DSDV, AOMDV, and ZRP Routing Protocols Application Simulation ... (Ery Safrianti, Linna O. Sari, Fitriani Saputri) 129 Topology-based routing protocols use routing tables to store link information as a basis for packet forwarding from the source to the destination node. Based on network architecture, this protocol is categorized into three types, namely Proactive, Reactive, and Hybrid protocols (Pradana et al., 2017). Figure 2. Routing protocols on VANET (Pradana et al., 2017) a) Proactive Routing Protocol The advantage of a proactive routing protocol is that it does not require route discovery because the destination route has been previously saved. Example: FSR, OLSR, DSDV. b) Reactive Routing Protocol The advantage of the reactive routing protocol is that the route search is performed when communication is needed by the node. It consists of the Route Discovery phase, where the requested packet floods the network to determine the path. Example: AODV, DSR, JARR, TORA, AOMDV c) Hybrid Routing Protocol Hybrid Routing Protocol was introduced to reduce overhead control and the initial delay in the route discovery process in the proactive routing protocol. Example: ZRP, HARP, HAODV. DSDV DSDV is an ad hoc proactive routing protocol algorithm, which uses a distance vector routing method equipped with a sequence number. This method allows each node in the network to exchange routing tables through neighboring nodes (Febrian et al., 2018). AOMDV AOMDV is a reactive routing protocol that develops from the AODV uni-path routing protocol to minimize frequent connection failures and interrupted routes. Similar to other routing protocols, it also provides two primary services, namely route discovery and maintenance. AOMDV is vector based and uses a hop-by-hop approach. Furthermore, it only searches for needed routes using the route discovery procedure (Anisia et al., 2016). ZRP The ZRP concept on the network is the building zone of each node that allows for several zone construction. According to (Adiwicaksono, 2017), the nodes within a predetermined geographic area is also known as the radius. 2.2. Network Simulator NS-2 is a network simulation software with a simple script language developed using two programming languages , namely C ++ and TCL (Shiddi Qi et al., 2017). 2.3. Simulation of Urban Mobility (SUMO) SUMO is one of the tools for mobility generators used for VANET simulations. It is an open-source microscopic traffic simulation package designed to handle networks with broad channels (Pradana et al., 2017). Buletin Pos dan Telekomunikasi Vol. 18 No.2 (2020): 127-144 130 2.4. Open Street Map (OSM) OpenStreetMap (OSM) is a web-based project used to create a free and open map of the world, built entirely by volunteers by conducting surveys using GPS devices, digitizing satellite imagery, and collecting and freeing geographical data that is publicly available. 2.5. AWK AWK is a programming language used to manipulate data and make reports. It can also be used in the command line and script by sequentially scanning the line standard input, file, or output processe(AM et al., 2019). 2.6. Network Performance Parameters Network performance is measured by the quality of service (QoS) parameter. It can show consistency, the success rate of sending data, etc. Several parameters can be used to measure network performance, namely, packet delivery ratio (PDR), end to end delay (E2E), overhead routing (RO), throughput, collision rate, and packet loss (AM et al., 2019) 1. Packet delivery ratio (PDR) Packet delivery ratio is the ratio between the number of packets received by the destination and the number of packets sent by the source. Packet Delivery Ratio is calculated with equation 1, where received is the number of data packets received and sent is the number of data packets sent. PDR = received sent x100% .................................................................................................................. (1) Packet Delivery Ratio may indicate the success of the package sent. The higher the Packet Delivery Ratio, the more successful the package delivery is (Ovari, 2017). ITU-T G.114 recommends that the value for the quality of service (QoS) in the packet delivery ratio (PDR) is 100% in VANET (vehicular ad hoc network) communications with this value, the routing protocol can work properly. 2. End to End Delay (E2E) E2E is calculated from the average delay between the time the packet was received and when it was sent as shown in equation (2), where treceived [i] is the time of receiving the packet with the order / id ith, tsent [i] is the time when the packet is sent with the order / id-i, and sent is the number of data packets sent. E2E = ∑ treceived sent i=0 −tsent[i] sent ......
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信