三元流体流动数值方法的比较:浸入边界、水平集和相场方法

IF 0.3 Q4 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
Seunggyu Lee, Darae Jeong, Yongho Choi, Junseok Kim
{"title":"三元流体流动数值方法的比较:浸入边界、水平集和相场方法","authors":"Seunggyu Lee, Darae Jeong, Yongho Choi, Junseok Kim","doi":"10.12941/JKSIAM.2016.20.083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews and compares three different methods for modeling incom- pressible and immiscible ternary fluid flows: the immersed boundary, level set, and phase-field methods. The immersed boundary method represents the moving interface by tracking the La- grangian particles. In the level set method, an interface is defined implicitly by using the signed distance function, and its evolution is governed by a transport equation. In the phase-field method, the advective Cahn-Hilliard equation is used as the evolution equation, and its order parameter also implicitly defines an interface. Each method has its merits and demerits. We perform the several simulations under different conditions to examine the merits and demerits of each method. Based on the results, we determine the most suitable method depending on the specific modeling needs of different situations.","PeriodicalId":41717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL METHODS FOR TERNARY FLUID FLOWS: IMMERSED BOUNDARY, LEVEL-SET, AND PHASE-FIELD METHODS\",\"authors\":\"Seunggyu Lee, Darae Jeong, Yongho Choi, Junseok Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.12941/JKSIAM.2016.20.083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reviews and compares three different methods for modeling incom- pressible and immiscible ternary fluid flows: the immersed boundary, level set, and phase-field methods. The immersed boundary method represents the moving interface by tracking the La- grangian particles. In the level set method, an interface is defined implicitly by using the signed distance function, and its evolution is governed by a transport equation. In the phase-field method, the advective Cahn-Hilliard equation is used as the evolution equation, and its order parameter also implicitly defines an interface. Each method has its merits and demerits. We perform the several simulations under different conditions to examine the merits and demerits of each method. Based on the results, we determine the most suitable method depending on the specific modeling needs of different situations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12941/JKSIAM.2016.20.083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12941/JKSIAM.2016.20.083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文综述并比较了不可压非混相三元流体流动的三种不同的建模方法:浸入边界法、水平集法和相场法。浸入边界法通过跟踪拉-格朗日粒子来表示运动界面。在水平集方法中,使用带符号距离函数隐式地定义接口,接口的演化由传输方程控制。在相场法中,采用平流Cahn-Hilliard方程作为演化方程,其阶参量也隐式地定义了界面。每种方法都有其优点和缺点。我们在不同的条件下进行了几种模拟,以检验每种方法的优缺点。根据结果,我们根据不同情况的具体建模需求确定最合适的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL METHODS FOR TERNARY FLUID FLOWS: IMMERSED BOUNDARY, LEVEL-SET, AND PHASE-FIELD METHODS
This paper reviews and compares three different methods for modeling incom- pressible and immiscible ternary fluid flows: the immersed boundary, level set, and phase-field methods. The immersed boundary method represents the moving interface by tracking the La- grangian particles. In the level set method, an interface is defined implicitly by using the signed distance function, and its evolution is governed by a transport equation. In the phase-field method, the advective Cahn-Hilliard equation is used as the evolution equation, and its order parameter also implicitly defines an interface. Each method has its merits and demerits. We perform the several simulations under different conditions to examine the merits and demerits of each method. Based on the results, we determine the most suitable method depending on the specific modeling needs of different situations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信