社会正义姐妹会:咨询师和社工的主张不同吗?

Q2 Social Sciences
Alexandria K. Kerwin, E. Doughty
{"title":"社会正义姐妹会:咨询师和社工的主张不同吗?","authors":"Alexandria K. Kerwin, E. Doughty","doi":"10.1080/2326716X.2017.1294123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to explore a panel of experts’ opinions concerning potential features distinguishing social justice advocacy in counseling from social work. The experts in the area of social justice counseling came to consensus on issues concerning social justice and professional identity. The panelists concluded that distinguishing the two professions is counterproductive to the mission of helping professions. Several expert responses addressed the integration of social justice advocacy into the professional identity of counseling, including use of professional guidelines and education strategies.","PeriodicalId":37213,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sisters in Social Justice: Do Counselors and Social Workers Advocate Differently?\",\"authors\":\"Alexandria K. Kerwin, E. Doughty\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2326716X.2017.1294123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to explore a panel of experts’ opinions concerning potential features distinguishing social justice advocacy in counseling from social work. The experts in the area of social justice counseling came to consensus on issues concerning social justice and professional identity. The panelists concluded that distinguishing the two professions is counterproductive to the mission of helping professions. Several expert responses addressed the integration of social justice advocacy into the professional identity of counseling, including use of professional guidelines and education strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2326716X.2017.1294123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2326716X.2017.1294123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是探讨专家小组对咨询与社会工作中社会正义倡导的潜在特征的看法。社会公正咨询领域的专家们就社会公正和职业认同问题达成了共识。小组成员的结论是,区分这两种职业对帮助职业的使命是适得其反的。一些专家的答复涉及将社会正义宣传纳入咨询的专业特性,包括使用专业准则和教育战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sisters in Social Justice: Do Counselors and Social Workers Advocate Differently?
ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to explore a panel of experts’ opinions concerning potential features distinguishing social justice advocacy in counseling from social work. The experts in the area of social justice counseling came to consensus on issues concerning social justice and professional identity. The panelists concluded that distinguishing the two professions is counterproductive to the mission of helping professions. Several expert responses addressed the integration of social justice advocacy into the professional identity of counseling, including use of professional guidelines and education strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信