Energy heterogeneity analysis of heterogeneous clustering protocols

In Wireless Sensor Networks the nodes have restricted battery power and the exhaustion of battery depends on various issues. In recent developments, various clustering protocols have been proposed to diminish the energy depletion of the node and prolong the network lifespan by reducing power consumption. However, each protocol is inappropriate for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. The efficiency of heterogeneous wireless sensor networks declines as changing the node heterogeneity. This paper reviews cluster head selection criteria of various clustering protocols for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks in terms of node heterogeneity and compares the performance of these protocols on several parameters like clustering technique, cluster head selection criteria, nodes lifetime, energy efficiency under two-level and three-level heterogeneous wireless sensor networks protocols Stable Election Protocol (SEP), Zonal-Stable Election Protocol (ZSEP), Distributed Energy-Efficient Clustering (DEEC), A Direct Transmission And Residual Energy Based Stable Election Protocol (DTRE-SEP), Developed Distributed Energy-Efficient Clustering (DDEEC), Zone-Based Heterogeneous Clustering Protocol (ZBHCP), Enhanced Distributed Energy Efficient Clustering (EDEEC), Threshold Distributed Energy Efficient Clustering (TDEEC), Enhanced Stable Election Protocol (SEP-E), and Threshold Stable Election Protocol (TSEP). The comparison has shown that the TDEEC has very effective results over other over two-level and three-level heterogeneous wireless sensor networks protocols and has extended the unstable region significantly. From simulations, it can also be proved that adding node heterogeneity can significantly increase the network life.