“转换”对话:重新思考学术课程储备中的合理使用

Q3 Social Sciences

Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve Pub Date : 2014-08-08 DOI:10.1080/1072303X.2014.964444

Ryan F. Buller

{"title":"“转换”对话:重新思考学术课程储备中的合理使用","authors":"Ryan F. Buller","doi":"10.1080/1072303X.2014.964444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Association of Research Libraries' 2012 publication, Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Academic and Research Libraries, focuses heavily on the concept of transformative use within the fair use analysis. In some cases, the Association of Research Libraries advocates for using the entire work in an electronic format for course reserves. However, current approaches to electronic course reserves and fair use/transformative use arguments are not conducive to utilizing the Association of Research Libraries' recommendations. This article attempts to reframe the conversation by examining fair use in a broad context and the role of the class in the fair use analysis.","PeriodicalId":35376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Transforming” the Conversation: Rethinking Fair Use in Academic Course Reserves\",\"authors\":\"Ryan F. Buller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1072303X.2014.964444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Association of Research Libraries' 2012 publication, Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Academic and Research Libraries, focuses heavily on the concept of transformative use within the fair use analysis. In some cases, the Association of Research Libraries advocates for using the entire work in an electronic format for course reserves. However, current approaches to electronic course reserves and fair use/transformative use arguments are not conducive to utilizing the Association of Research Libraries' recommendations. This article attempts to reframe the conversation by examining fair use in a broad context and the role of the class in the fair use analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1072303X.2014.964444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1072303X.2014.964444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

研究型图书馆协会2012年出版的《学术和研究型图书馆合理使用最佳实践准则》重点关注了合理使用分析中的变革性使用概念。在某些情况下，研究型图书馆协会提倡以电子形式使用全部作品作为课程储备。然而，目前关于电子课程储备和合理使用/转换使用争论的方法不利于利用研究图书馆协会的建议。本文试图通过在广泛的背景下研究合理使用以及课堂在合理使用分析中的作用来重新构建对话。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

“Transforming” the Conversation: Rethinking Fair Use in Academic Course Reserves

The Association of Research Libraries' 2012 publication, Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Academic and Research Libraries, focuses heavily on the concept of transformative use within the fair use analysis. In some cases, the Association of Research Libraries advocates for using the entire work in an electronic format for course reserves. However, current approaches to electronic course reserves and fair use/transformative use arguments are not conducive to utilizing the Association of Research Libraries' recommendations. This article attempts to reframe the conversation by examining fair use in a broad context and the role of the class in the fair use analysis.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The peer reviewed Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve is the only North American journal devoted to interlibrary loan, document delivery, and electronic reserve librarianship. While other journals in reference services and academic librarianship occasionally publish articles on interlibrary loan or electronic reserve, this unique journal publishes over half of all articles on these topics. These important articles are a mix of practice and theory. Retitled from the Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply to reflect the expansion of its focus to include electronic reserve, the Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve marks a clear direction to make the journal even more useful to all libraries.