穆斯林社会工作者在模拟宗教法庭监护、婚姻和离婚案件的小插曲中对患有精神疾病或智力障碍的父母的建议

IF 0.8 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
Leena Badran, Ashraf Hejazi, A. Rimmerman
{"title":"穆斯林社会工作者在模拟宗教法庭监护、婚姻和离婚案件的小插曲中对患有精神疾病或智力障碍的父母的建议","authors":"Leena Badran, Ashraf Hejazi, A. Rimmerman","doi":"10.1080/15426432.2022.2160409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Religion plays a central role in clients’ identities, their behaviors, and their contacts with professionals. Such influence on professionals’ practice is evident in cases of clients with intellectual disability and mental health illnesses in Israel. The article examines the tendency of Muslim social worker to prefer religious recommendations (following the qadi’s decision) regarding the rights of marriage/divorce and child custody for parents with Mental Illness (MI) or Intellectual Disability Disorders (IDD) in simulated vignettes court cases. The study analyzed vignettes simulating Muslim religious (Sharia) court cases. Muslim social workers (138) completed a background and religiosity questionnaires as well as their response to 25 vignettes simulated court rulings adapted for this study. The decision of the qadi was rephrased in a short statement and appended after each case of the 25, this decision was considered as a religious recommendation since it based on religious consideration. The participants were asked whether they agree or disagree with these recommendations. Muslim social workers tended to consider religious recommendation when the family of the person with MI was described as religious. The discussed issue (marriage/divorce or child custody) was found to explain their tendency to adopt religious recommendation in cases of IDD. Implications of our findings are discussed with respect to social work practice and education.","PeriodicalId":45302,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND SPIRITUALITY IN SOCIAL WORK","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Muslim social workers’ recommendation of parents with mental illness or intellectual disability disorders in vignettes of simulated religious court cases of custody, marriage, and divorce\",\"authors\":\"Leena Badran, Ashraf Hejazi, A. Rimmerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15426432.2022.2160409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Religion plays a central role in clients’ identities, their behaviors, and their contacts with professionals. Such influence on professionals’ practice is evident in cases of clients with intellectual disability and mental health illnesses in Israel. The article examines the tendency of Muslim social worker to prefer religious recommendations (following the qadi’s decision) regarding the rights of marriage/divorce and child custody for parents with Mental Illness (MI) or Intellectual Disability Disorders (IDD) in simulated vignettes court cases. The study analyzed vignettes simulating Muslim religious (Sharia) court cases. Muslim social workers (138) completed a background and religiosity questionnaires as well as their response to 25 vignettes simulated court rulings adapted for this study. The decision of the qadi was rephrased in a short statement and appended after each case of the 25, this decision was considered as a religious recommendation since it based on religious consideration. The participants were asked whether they agree or disagree with these recommendations. Muslim social workers tended to consider religious recommendation when the family of the person with MI was described as religious. The discussed issue (marriage/divorce or child custody) was found to explain their tendency to adopt religious recommendation in cases of IDD. Implications of our findings are discussed with respect to social work practice and education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND SPIRITUALITY IN SOCIAL WORK\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND SPIRITUALITY IN SOCIAL WORK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2022.2160409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND SPIRITUALITY IN SOCIAL WORK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2022.2160409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宗教在客户的身份、行为以及与专业人士的接触中起着核心作用。这种对专业人员执业的影响在以色列智力残疾和精神疾病患者的案例中表现得很明显。这篇文章考察了穆斯林社会工作者倾向于在模拟的法庭案例中,就有精神疾病(MI)或智力残疾障碍(IDD)的父母的结婚/离婚权利和子女监护权提出宗教建议(遵循卡迪法官的决定)。该研究分析了模拟穆斯林宗教(伊斯兰教法)法庭案件的小插曲。穆斯林社会工作者(138)完成了一份背景和宗教信仰调查问卷,以及他们对25个模拟法庭裁决的回应。卡迪的决定在一份简短的声明中重新措词,并附在25个案件的每一个案件之后。这一决定被认为是一项宗教建议,因为它是基于宗教考虑。参与者被问及他们是否同意这些建议。当MI患者的家庭被描述为宗教人士时,穆斯林社会工作者倾向于考虑宗教建议。所讨论的问题(结婚/离婚或子女监护)被发现可以解释他们对缺碘症采取宗教建议的倾向。我们的研究结果对社会工作实践和教育的影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Muslim social workers’ recommendation of parents with mental illness or intellectual disability disorders in vignettes of simulated religious court cases of custody, marriage, and divorce
ABSTRACT Religion plays a central role in clients’ identities, their behaviors, and their contacts with professionals. Such influence on professionals’ practice is evident in cases of clients with intellectual disability and mental health illnesses in Israel. The article examines the tendency of Muslim social worker to prefer religious recommendations (following the qadi’s decision) regarding the rights of marriage/divorce and child custody for parents with Mental Illness (MI) or Intellectual Disability Disorders (IDD) in simulated vignettes court cases. The study analyzed vignettes simulating Muslim religious (Sharia) court cases. Muslim social workers (138) completed a background and religiosity questionnaires as well as their response to 25 vignettes simulated court rulings adapted for this study. The decision of the qadi was rephrased in a short statement and appended after each case of the 25, this decision was considered as a religious recommendation since it based on religious consideration. The participants were asked whether they agree or disagree with these recommendations. Muslim social workers tended to consider religious recommendation when the family of the person with MI was described as religious. The discussed issue (marriage/divorce or child custody) was found to explain their tendency to adopt religious recommendation in cases of IDD. Implications of our findings are discussed with respect to social work practice and education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: In the Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, scholars, researchers, and practitioners examine issues of social justice and religion as they relate to the development of policy and delivery of social services. In addition to timely literature reviews, the journal presents up-to-date, in-depth, expert information on: sectarian and nonsectarian approaches to spirituality and ethics; justice and peace; philosophically oriented aspects of religion in the social services; conceptual frameworks; the philosophy of social work; and a great deal more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信